*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU. If you are using Checkpoint, the links can be found in the CP PDF at the bottom of this post.

NB: Please note that all updates will include links for Westlaw AU only (with the exception of the Journals available on Checkpoint, which will have an extra PDF). For further information, please click here.

The latest issue of the Australian Tax Review (Volume 43 Part 1) contains the following material:

EDITORIAL

  • Tax and politics

Articles

The politics of tax: Can it be disinfected? – The Hon Justice Richard Edmonds

With the recent change of government in Australia, it is perhaps a pertinent time to ask: what will this bring on the tax reform front? Arguably, very little because the infection of politics in tax has become so pervasive that it has extinguished any hope for sound and informed consensus. Such consensus is an essential platform upon which to formulate and implement structural tax reform going forward. The author canvasses whether it might be possible to apply some disinfectant to take the politics out of tax, or at least reduce the infection, but accepts the task, while worth a try, will not be easy.

To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale order form and email it to [email protected].

An international dimension to the politics of tax – The Hon Justice Logan RFD

The assertion of a right to tax has always been a manifestation of sovereignty. In Australia, that right is constitutionally conditioned upon a right to contest liability in the courts. Cyberspace knows no national boundaries. Information technology has already and will, ever increasingly, both challenge the relevance of national sovereignty and provide greater opportunities for its exercise in relation to the identification of evasion of tax. This article explores by reference to recently decided cases issues which have arisen and may yet arise from the interface between the assertion of a right to tax and information technology.

To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale order form and email it to [email protected].

The dangers of the ATO’s “policy intent” approach to the construction of Tax Acts – Mark Robertson QC

The author discusses the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) “policy intent” approach to statutory construction. He argues that Griffith CJ’s observation 100 years ago that “nothing could be more dangerous or fallacious” holds true today, especially because the ATO is involved in drafting. This approach, which not only leads to the wrong result, has led to the ATO being criticised for encroaching beyond its Constitutional function. He urges tax teachers to add to their syllabus the consequences of the wrong approach with a view to ensuring that the correct purposive approach is understood better by the next generation.

To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale order form and email it to [email protected].

The consequences of disposals of part interests in mineral and petroleum tenements – Antony Barrier

Few areas of Australian revenue law have attracted as much attention in recent times as the method of taxation of the country’s mineral wealth. With soaring commodities prices, the Australian mineral and petroleum sectors expanded exponentially in the first decade of the 21st century, with growth in both exploration for new deposits and exploitation of existing reserves. Amid much controversy, the mineral resource rent tax and extended petroleum resource rent tax regime commenced operation on 1 July 2012. However, there are many imposts affecting the resource-based industries other than the headline-hitting “rent” taxes. This article takes a practical and comparative look at the various Australian taxes in the context of a common resources transaction: the disposal of a part interest in a mining or petroleum tenement.

To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale order form and email it to [email protected].

A re-evaluation of deprival value: The case of specialised in-situ asset valuation – Dr Hung Chu

The valuation of specialised in-situ assets is one of the central issues in “land rich” cases. This article revisits the concept of deprival value and identifies several problems associated with its use as a measure of market value for tax purposes. The article also provides an alternative theoretically sound framework to assess the market value of specialised in-situ assets for tax purposes in certain cases.

To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale order form and email it to [email protected].

For the pdf version of the table of contents, click here: WAU – AT Rev Vol 42 Pt 1 Contents or here: CP – AT Rev Vol 42 Pt 1 Contents.

Click here to access this Part on Westlaw AU

Click here to access this Part on Checkpoint