*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.
NB: Please note that from now on, all updates will include links for Westlaw AU only (with the exception of the Journals available on Checkpoint, which will have an extra PDF). For further information, please click here.
The latest issue of the Australian Journal of Administrative Law (Volume 21 Part 3) contains the following material:
- Legislative drafting: Yet again
- The dark side
- “On a question of law”
The watershed for Commonwealth appropriation and spending after Pape and Williams? – Melissa Hogg and Charles Lawson
The decisions of Pape v Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 238 CLR 1 and Williams v Commonwealth (2012) 248 CLR 156 marked an important change in relation to the appropriation and spending powers under the Constitution. This article considers the significant uncertainty still surrounding the Constitution’s financial power and discusses the implications of these decisions in the broader context of appropriations and spending. The article concludes that shifting the focus of constitutional compliance from appropriations to spending may have unintended consequences.
This article considers ways ombudsmen can produce effective own-initiative investigations. It examines ombudsman legislation and practices and compares them with those surrounding performance audits of auditor-generals and law reform commission projects, in Australia and Canada. The latter two activities are similar to own-initiative investigations as they are an investigative/evaluative process, their recommendations are not binding and they are carried out by institutions that are independent of the Executive and have been created and shaped by similar economic and political events. The article considers the meaning of effectiveness and suggests an effective own-initiative investigation is one that assists the reduction of systemic public administration issues. The article considers ideas for effective own-initiative investigations, supported by case studies of reports of the Victorian Ombudsman, Ontario Ombudsman, Australian National Audit Office and the Victorian Law Reform Commission. The article suggests an effective own-initiative investigation may be achieved if the investigated agency respects the investigation, is willing to implement the recommendations, has the ability to implement the recommendations, and continues to prioritise implementation of the recommendations. Ombudsmen may achieve these goals through engaging in proper dialogue, gathering empirical evidence, directing implementation and carefully selecting investigations.
Taking Facebook at face value: The Refugee Review Tribunal’s use of social media evidence – Emma Wagstaff and Kieran Tranter
This article argues that the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) is placing excessive weight on evidence gathered from social media in reviewing refugee decisions. It will be argued that the RRT is assigning high truth values to information concerning applicants and others from social media. This is despite detailed research that suggests that social media rarely conveys accurate or consistent information about an individual. In taking such evidence at face value the RRT is misunderstanding social media and potentially making errors in its decisions.
DISCRIMINATION AND REFUGEES – Dr Paula Gerber
- “Gold-standard” discrimination protections for LGBTI people enter into force in Australia
CASENOTES – Nathalie Ng
- Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak
WORK AND EMPLOYMENT – Joo-Cheong Tham and Beth Gaze
- Accountability and transparency under the subclass 457 visa program: Is there cause for concern?
For the pdf version of the table of contents, click here: WAU – AJ Admin L Vol 21 Pt 3 Contents.