*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AEST).
The latest issue of the Australian Law Journal (Volume 93 Part 10) contains the following material:
CURRENT ISSUES – Editor: Justice François Kunc
- The Need for Judicial Bullying Policies
- A Crisis for Legal Aid Funding in NSW
- Lawyer X – The First Conviction Overturned
- An Unusual Move in South Australia
- Vale Professor Ivan Shearer AM RFD
- The Curated Page
CONVEYANCING AND PROPERTY – Editors: Robert Angyal SC and Brendan Edgeworth
- Caveat Vendor: Defects in Title Reconsidered
- “The Guardians at the Gate”: E-Conveyancing and the Duties of Solicitors and Conveyancers
FAMILY LAW – Editor: Richard Ingleby
- Family Law for the Future – A Response to the ALRC “Radical” Recommendation
CLASS ACTIONS – Editor: Justice Michael BJ Lee
- The AMP Competing Class Actions: From Five to One
ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME – Editor: Dr Damien J Cremean
- Piracy, Sabotage and Terrorism
RECENT CASES – Editor: Ruth CA Higgins SC
- Corporations – External Administration – Receivers and Other Controllers of Property – Priority Debts – Trusts – Trustees – Right of Indemnity – Whether Trustee’s Right of Indemnity Confers Beneficial Interest in Trust Assets – Whether Such Interest Is “Property”
- Insurance – New Zealand – Home Insurance – Whether Right to Replacement Benefits Can Be Assigned Where Insured Has Not Incurred the Cost of Reinstatement So As To Entitle the Assignee to Reinstate and Recover the Costs
The correct analysis of proof of causation of loss in securities market nondisclosure class actions (referred to as “shareholder class actions”) is hotly disputed. As well as being a matter of doctrinal significance, it has substantial relevance to the practicalities and costs of prosecuting these actions and to the related issue of court efficiency and case management. Traditionally, reliance-based causation is required but market-based causation was considered arguable at an interlocutory stage by the Full Federal Court in a class action. It has also been accepted by the NSW Supreme Court in a non-class action. It is suggested that final judicial acceptance of market-based causation in a class action at trial could be balanced by safeguards that would allow rebuttal of causation in some situations and some limiting of the class. This may allay somewhat the fears of those who see market based causation as contrary to policy and principle.
Thinking Machines and Smiley Faces – Justice Stephen Estcourt AM and Ms Karen Marr
The reality of autonomous thinking machines for use in judicial decision-making is already upon us. The potential exists now for artificial intelligence tools to be provided to the judiciary to aid in the setting of parole periods, the granting or refusing of bail and in sentencing decisions. However, algorithms are designed by humans, and they reflect the biases of those who develop them, as well as the biases buried deep in the data on which they are built. Society needs to make decisions now as to what outcomes it wants algorithms to prioritise. Educating the public to be sceptical about algorithm results, ensuring transparency and auditing algorithms for bias, as well as establishing regulatory frameworks by legislation, will all go towards ensuring that some legal outcomes can be as fairly determined by a machine as by a judge. But will that simply give us another competent judge?
The Nature of Recaption – James O’Hara
Recaption is a remedy empowering individuals to vindicate their possessory rights in property, and obtain redress without recourse to a court. The remedy touches closely to the everyday person’s conception of their fundamental rights. There are everyday applications. The puppy escapes into a neighbour’s backyard. A child has their bicycle taken by the school bully. An art collector has their irreplaceable masterpieces stolen. A backyard game of football results in the ball being inadvertently kicked over the neighbour’s fence. In each of those situations, the ordinary person would vehemently defend their respective rights to recapture the property. But the state of the law is unclear. This article aims to bring some clarity to the nature of recaption, the precise preconditions necessary for its exercise, and some commercial applications of the remedy.
BOOKS RECEIVED – Editor: Angelina A Gomez
- Elder Law: A Guide to Working with Older Australians, by Sue Field, Karen Williams and Caroline Sappideen (eds)
For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: ALJ Vol 93 No 10 Contents.
For general queries, please contact: email@example.com.