The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “A fly in the ointment for the ACCC? Implications of the Cement Australia decision for the interpretation of section 46” – Caroline Coops; and “Acceptable quality v merchantable quality” – Lynsey Edgar. Also in this Part are the following sections: Enforcement and Remedies; Case Note; What if…; Comments from Commerce; Consumer Concerns; Snapshots; Economic(s) Matters; Report from New Zealand; Report from Asia; and Report from Russia.
Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged "essential facilities", ACCC, acceptable quality, AJCCL, Alex Sundakov, Amanda Seethor, ASEAN member countries, Australian Consumer Law, Caroline Coops, Case Note, Cement Australia decision, Comments from Commerce, Competition Policy Review, Consumer concerns, Diana Biscoe, Douglas Shirrefs, Economic(s) Matters, energy usage charges, Enforcement and Remedies, Harper Review, Jemimah Roberts, Jenny Mee, Julia Borisova, Kerry Lee, Lindsay Trotman, Lynsey Edgar, Matthew Berkahn, Matthew Knox, merchantable quality, Murray Deakin, net neutrality, privatising regulated infrastructure, Report from Asia, Report from New Zealand, Report from Russia, Russell Miller AM, s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Simon Pryor, Snapshots, Tom Clarke, What if..., Xavier O’Halloran |
The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “In competition with each other? Implications of the apparently divergent outcomes in Flight Centre and ANZ” – Andrew Christopher and Thea Fabricius; “Vertical merger analysis in the United States, Europe and Australia” – Paul McLachlan; and “Consumer guarantees – lessons to be learnt from afar” – Lynden Griggs, Aviva Freilich and Nicolas Messel. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Authorisations and Notifications; Telecommunications; Case Note; Tribunal Tableaux; Council Considerations; and Report from Europe.
Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC, ACCC v ANZ, ACCC v Flight Centre, access to facilities, agency distribution agreements, AJCCL, Andrew Christopher, anti-competitive effects, antitrust damages actions, Australian Consumer Law, Authorisations and notifications, Aviva Freilich, Capucine Hague, Case Note, consumer guarantees, Council considerations, Holly Raiche, Jennifer Hambleton, Jonathan de Ridder, Louise Olsen, Lynden Griggs, Minh Bui, misleading and deceptive conduct, national access regime, Nicholas Messel, Obeid v ACCC, Paul McLachlan, Report from Europe, Telecommunications, Thea Fabricius, Tom S Pick, Tribunal Tableaux, vertical mergers |
The latest Part of ABLR includes the following articles: “The ACCC: Roots and branches – proposals to enhance ACCC effectiveness” – Caron Beaton-Wells; “Roots, branches and other objects – one step beyond the Harper Review?” – I S Wylie; “Online dispute resolution: The advantages, disadvantages, and the way forward” – Anthony John Sissian; “Challenges facing the notariat in Australasia in the 21st century” – Noel Cox; and “Dashed expectations? The impact of civil liability legislation on contractual damages for disappointment and distress” – Sonia Walker and Kate Lewins; and the following sections: Intellectual Property Law: “Why is an isolated segment of human DNA patentable under Australian law but not under United States law?”; Competition Law and Market Regulation: “Competition Policy Review: Draft recommendations on competition laws”; and Company and Securities Law: “The government response to the Senate Economic References Committee Report into the Australian Securities and Investments Commission”.
Posted in Australian Business Law Review (ABLR) | Tagged ABLR, ACCC, Anthony John Sissian, Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth), ASIC, Campbell Thompson, Caron Beaton-Wells, civil liability, Company and Securities Law, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Competition law and market regulation, Competition Policy Review, contracural damages, Harper Review, I S Wylie, intellectual property law, Kate Lewins, Legislation, Noel Cox, office of notary, online dispute resolution, root and branch inquiry, Senate Economic References Committee Report, Sonia Walker, Stephen Corones |
The November Part of the Australian Law Journal includes the following articles: “Equity: The soul and spirit of all law or a roguish thing? – Lehane Lecture 2014” – Lord David Neuberger; and “ACCC compulsory examinations: Does the “accusatorial” principle of criminal justice affect them?” – Peter Strickland; and the following sections: Current Issues; Conveyancing and Property; Crime and Evidence; Around the Nation: Northern Territory; Administrative Law; Around the Nation: Western Australia; Personalia; Corporations and Securities; International Focus; and Recent Cases.
Posted in Australian Law Journal, The (ALJ), Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC, accusatorial principle, Acting Justice Peter W Young AO, administrative law, Around the Nation: Northern Territory, Around the Nation: Western Australia, Chief Justice Paul de Jersey AC QC, Chief Justice Timothy Carmody, compulsory examinations, Conveyancing and property, Corporations and Securities, Crime and Evidence, criminal justice, Current issues, equity, forced labour, Hon Dean Mildren AM RFD QC, International focus, Justice Debbie Mortimer, Justice Jacqueline Gleeson, Justice Jennifer Davies, Justice Jonathan Beach, Justice Kenneth Martin, Justice Melissa Perry, Justice Michael Wigney, Justice Phillip Priest, Justice Richard White, Justice Tony Pagone, Lehane Lecture 2014, Lord David Neuberger, Personalia, Peter Butt, Peter Strickland, Recent cases, Robert Baxt AO, Ryszard Piotrowicz, Sienna Merope, Uniform Evidence Act |
The latest Part of AJCCL includes the following articles: “Australian Competition and Consumer Commission priorities” – Rod Sims; “Does it matter what the hypothetical consumer knows? An analysis of ACCC v TPG” – Haylene Treisman; and “A snuggle for survival – the paradox of section 44ZZRD(3)(c): Restricting co-operation may mean restricting competition” – Marianna Parry and Richard Hobson. Also in this part are the following sections: Authorisations and Notifications; Consumer Protections; Case note; What if…; Consumer Concerns; Report from Africa, Report from Europe; and Report from Latin America.
Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC, ACCC v TPG, AJCCL, Authorisations and notifications, Bernard McCabe, Case Note, Coles, competition law, construction industry, Consumer concerns, Consumer Protections, Haylene Treisman, Laurène Baudouin, Lesley Morphet, Luis Omar Guerrero Rodriguez, Marianna Parry, misleading or deceoptive conduct, mobile network coverage, Report from Africa, Report from Europe, Report from Latin America, resale price maintenance, restricting co-operation, Richard Hobson, Rod Sims, Russell Miller, s 44ZZRD(3)(c) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sarah Andrews, shopper docket, South Africa, supermarkets, Una Lawrence, What if..., Woolworths, Yves Brulard |
The latest Part of AJCCL includes the following articles: “False or misleading credence claims: What’s the harm and why should businesses care?” – Felicity Lee; “The far side of the Pilbara: The Productivity Commission on the wrong track?” – Dave Poddar and Angela Flannery; and “Blurring the bright line? Third line forcing revisited” – Justin Lipinski. Also in this Part are the following sections: Authorisations and Notifications; Enforcements and Remedies; Telecommunications; Case Notes; Tribunal Tableaux; Council Considerations; Report from Latin America; and Worth Repeating.
Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC, AJCCL, Amanda Richman, Angela Flannery, Antitrust Reform, Authorisations and notifications, Brazil, cartel conduct, case notes, Chile, collective bargaining arrangements, Council considerations, credence claims, Dave Poddar, Enforcements and remedies, false or misleading representations, Felicity Lee, Jennifer Hambleton, Mexico, Minh Bui, Natalie Naylor, Paul McLachlan, Pilbara Infrastructure, price setting, Productivity Commission, Report from Latin America, Rob Nicholls, Scott Meacock, Telecommunications, Tribunal Tableaux, Worth repeating |
Thomson Reuters is pleased to announce that Bob Baxt AO has joined the The Australian Law Journal Section Editor team. Bob will author two new sections: Corporations & Securities and Competition & Consumer Issues. As part of a reinvigoration program, a range of new Sections are being commissioned to ensure that subscribers are receiving a wide ...more
The latest Part of ABLR includes the following articles: “Consumer leases and consumer protection: Regulatory arbitrage and consumer harm” – Paul Ali, Cosima McRae, Ian Ramsay and Tiong Tjin Saw; “Wrestling with Giants – a critical account of supermarket power and competition law in Australia and the United Kingdom” – Madeline Taylor; and “Bounty hunters, whistleblowers and a new regulatory paradigm” – Vivienne Brand, Sulette Lombard and Jeff Fitzpatrick. There is also an Editorial and a Company Law and Securities section note.
Posted in Australian Business Law Review (ABLR), Update Summaries | Tagged ABLR, ACCC, company law and securities, competition law, consumer leases, Consumer Protection, Cosima McRae, Ian Ramsay, Jeff Fitzpatrick, Madeline Taylor, Paul Ali, regulation, Sulette Lombard, supermarket power, the Bell case, Tiong Tjin Saw, Vivienne Brand, whistleblowers |
The August 2013 issue of the Australian Business Law Review includes two interesting articles. The first comes from Caron Beaton-Wells and discusses the forthcoming review by the ACCC of its immunity policy for cartel conduct. The second article is by Anthony Duggan who focuses on chattel paper, one of the categories of personal property identified in the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth). There is also an editorial and a book review.
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.
Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: June 2015
The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “A fly in the ointment for the ACCC? Implications of the Cement Australia decision for the interpretation of section 46” – Caroline Coops; and “Acceptable quality v merchantable quality” – Lynsey Edgar. Also in this Part are the following sections: Enforcement and Remedies; Case Note; What if…; Comments from Commerce; Consumer Concerns; Snapshots; Economic(s) Matters; Report from New Zealand; Report from Asia; and Report from Russia.