Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)

Home
Journals
News & Summaries
- Update Summaries
Journals Index
Subscribe & Purchase
Permissions
Submissions

Home

Australian Journal of Administrative Law update: Vol 26 Pt 1

By Journal Alerts on April 2, 2019

This Part includes the following articles: “Standards of Appellate Review in Public Law Australia” – Kristina Stern and Georgina Westgarth; “Deliberation and Automation – When is a Decision a ‘Decision’?” – Yee-Fui Ng and Maria O’Sullivan; and “Re-thinking Bias in the Age of Automation” – Sarah Lim. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Current Issues; and Book Review.

Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged A Theory of Legitimate Expectations for Public Administration, Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), AJ Admin L, Alexander Brown, automation for administrative law, bias of automated systems against administrative decisions, book review, Current issues, digitalisation and automation of government processes, Editorial, Full Federal Court of Pintarich v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 79, Georgina Westgarth, Greg Weeks, Janina Boughey, Justin Davidson, Katie Miller, Kristina Stern, Maria O’Sullivan, Matthew Groves, Minister for Immigration & Border Protection vs SZVFW (2018) 92 ALJR 713; [2018] HCA 30, right to know, Sarah Lim, standards of appellate review in public law, Stephen Tully, Yee-Fui Ng | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 26 Pt 3

By Journal Alerts on September 19, 2018

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “‘Inconvenient Guests’? The Consumer Experience of Administrative Review for Electricity Pricing” – Julia Mansour and Brooke Greenwood; “Misuse of Market Power in Australia and Abuse of Dominance in Canada: Two Legislated Effects Tests for Unilateral Conduct” – Katharine Kemp; and the following sections: Authorisations and Notifications; Enforcement and Remedies; Restrictive Trade Practices; Case Note; Council Considerations; Economic(s) Matters; Report from China; Report from Europe; and Worth Repeating.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "purpose or effect", abuse of dominance in Canada, ACCC v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd, ACCC v Flight Centre Ltd (No 2), ACCC v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd, ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (No 2), Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), administrative review for electricity pricing, AJCCL, Alex Sundakov, Australian Competition Tribunal under the Limited Merits Review (LMR) regime, Australian law against misuse of market power, Authorisations and notifications, Brooke Greenwood, Carolyn Oddie, Case Note, Christopher Hodgekiss SC, Council considerations, Economic(s) Matters, Editorial, Enforcement and Remedies, Ergon Energy Corp Ltd v Australian Energy Regulator, European Commission, Felicity Lee, Flight Centre v ACCC, full Federal Court dismisses Pfizer appeal, Georgia Sands, Google Inc v ACCC, increased penalties for attempted price-fixing, Independent Cinemas Australia Inc. (ICA), Julia Mansour, Julie Clarke, Katharine Kemp, market failure due to externalities, Mega-Breaches, merger of Chinese competition authorities, Paul D Evans, procedural breaches in merger control cases, Rebecca Mahony, recent successes of the ACCC, Report from China, Report from Europe, Restrictive trade practices, Sarah Russell, Sharon Henrick, Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v ACCC, Susan Ning, the Council's work in 2017-2018, Tom S Pick, Worth repeating | Leave a response

Public law developments

By journals team on February 4, 2013

(Selection of excerpts published in Developments, Vol 23 Pt 4 (Dec 2012) of the Public Law Review) FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DELAYS REFERENDUM ON INDIGENOUS CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION The federal government has decided to delay any referendum on the recognition of Indigenous Australians. The decision to delay the referendum, which was originally planned to be held before the next ...more