The latest Part of the Australian Law Journal contains the following articles: “An Australian International Commercial Court – Not A Bad Idea Or What A Bad Idea?” – The Hon Justice A S Bell; “Australia’s “Abhorrent Violent Material” Law: Shouting “Nerd Harder” And Drowning Out Speech” – Evelyn Douek; and “Rituals Of Engagement: What Happens To The Ring When An Engagement Is Called Off?” – James Duffy, Elizabeth Dickson and John O’Brien. This Part also includes the following sections: Current Issues; Family Law, International Focus, Around the Nation: Victoria; Book Review; and Obituary.
Posted in Australian Law Journal, The (ALJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "Should the Jury Decide?" – A Multi-disciplinary Summit, Adrienne Stone, ALJ, Angelina Gomez, Around the Nation: Victoria, Australian international commercial court, AVM Act, book review, Cheryl Saunders, Cohen v Sellar, Criminal Code Amendment (Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material) Act 2019, Current issues, engagement ring, Enhancing the Contribution of Legal Academics to the Development of Australian Law, family law, financial agreement, Graham v Squibb, International focus, Justice Clyde Croft AM, Justice François Kunc, law, marriage, Modern Slavery Legislation in Australia, Obituary, Professor Stuart Kaye, Regional Convention on the Recognition of Higher Education Qualifications, regulation of leases, Richard Ingleby, Science and Medicine in Summit, The Curated Page, The Hon Jane Hamilton Mathews AO, The Hon Justice A S Bell, The Oxford Handbook of the Australian Constitution, The Year Ahead, Toh v Su, When An Engagement Is Called Off |
Nominations are closing soon for the Australian Association of Constitutional Law’s (AACL) Saunders Prize, which will be awarded to the author of an article or note on a subject of constitutional law published in an Australian legal journal in 2016. The prize is named in honour of Laureate Professor Emeritus Cheryl Saunders AO in recognition ...more
The latest Part of the Public Law Review features a tribute to the work of Justice Kenneth Hayne AC, with selections from a symposium which originated in a session of the 2015 Constitutional Law Conference: “Introductory note – Professor Cheryl Saunders; “Justice Hayne’s contribution to public law: An overview” – Justice Geoffrey Nettle; “Justice Hayne and the constitutional underpinnings of enforcement of the limits on public power” – Stephen Donaghue QC; “Justice Hayne and the implied freedom of political communication: – Kristen Walker QC; and “Justice Hayne’s dissenting judgments” – Frances Gordon. This Part also includes the following content: Comments: “Maori rights: Legal or political?” – Claire Charters; “End-of-life choice in New Zealand’s Parliament and courts” – Andrew Geddis; “What happens in the house, stays in the house” – Robert S Shiels; Case note: “McCloy v New South Wales: Political donations, political communication and the place of proportionality analysis” – Anne Carter; Article: “Constitutional dimensions of State executive power: An analysis of the power to contract and spend” – Selena Bateman; Book Review: “Human Rights Acts: The Mechanisms Compared” – reviewed by Gabriella Raetz and Patrick Keyzer; and Developments.
Posted in Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged Andrew Geddis, Anne Carter, book review, Cheryl Saunders, Claire Charters, Comments, developments, dissenting judgments, end of life rights, Frances Gordon, Gabriella Raetz, Hayne J, Human Rights Acts, implied freedom of political communication, Justice Geoffrey Nettle, Justice Hayne, Justice Kenneth Hayne AC, Kristen Walker QC, limits on public power, Maori rights, McCloy v New South Wales (2015) 89 ALJR 857, New Zealand, Patrick Keyzer, PLR, political donations, power to contract and spend, proportionality analysis, public law, Robert S Shiels, Selena Bateman, State executive power, Stephen Donaghue QC, Tribute to Justice Kenneth Hayne AC, Williams v Commonwealth |
New article submissions to the Public Law Review are always welcome by the Editors, Cheryl Saunders and Janet McLean. The Review is designed to make a contribution to an informed and vibrant public debate about public law in Australia and New Zealand. To that end, it seeks to publish work of the highest quality on ...more
New faces have recently joined the Board of Advisers of the Public Law Review, replacing a number of departing members who generously supported the Review over a long period of time. The Board of Advisers is integral to the Review, working with the Editors, Cheryl Saunders and Janet McLean, to maintain the high standards of the Review ...more
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.
Public Law Review update: December 2015
The latest Part of the Public Law Review features a tribute to the work of Justice Kenneth Hayne AC, with selections from a symposium which originated in a session of the 2015 Constitutional Law Conference: “Introductory note – Professor Cheryl Saunders; “Justice Hayne’s contribution to public law: An overview” – Justice Geoffrey Nettle; “Justice Hayne and the constitutional underpinnings of enforcement of the limits on public power” – Stephen Donaghue QC; “Justice Hayne and the implied freedom of political communication: – Kristen Walker QC; and “Justice Hayne’s dissenting judgments” – Frances Gordon. This Part also includes the following content: Comments: “Maori rights: Legal or political?” – Claire Charters; “End-of-life choice in New Zealand’s Parliament and courts” – Andrew Geddis; “What happens in the house, stays in the house” – Robert S Shiels; Case note: “McCloy v New South Wales: Political donations, political communication and the place of proportionality analysis” – Anne Carter; Article: “Constitutional dimensions of State executive power: An analysis of the power to contract and spend” – Selena Bateman; Book Review: “Human Rights Acts: The Mechanisms Compared” – reviewed by Gabriella Raetz and Patrick Keyzer; and Developments.