David Goodwin

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: December 2015

By Journal Alerts on December 9, 2015

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Serving the goals of trademark owners through the Australian Consumer Law: A reflection on Google Inc v ACCC” – Althaf Marsoof; and “Exempting environmental protection boycotts from competition laws: Should purpose or public benefit be the test?” – David Goodwin; and the following sections: Defective Goods, Case Notes; Report from India; Report from North America; Benchmarks; and Book Review.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged Abhilasha Nautiyal, ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 317 ALR 73, ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330, ACCC v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 110 IPR 324, accessorial liability provisions, AdWords, AJCCL, Australian Consumer Law (ACL), Benchmarks, book review, boycotts, case notes, Christopher Pleatsikas, Competition Commission of India, competition laws, Consumer Protection, David Goodwin, Defective Goods, Director, dominant purpose test, Dr Ron Desiatnik, e-commerce, Editorial, environmental protection, exemption, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v CFMEU (2015) 229 FCR 331, From Protection to Competition: The Politics of Trade Practices Reform in Australia, Google Inc v ACCC (2013) 249 CLR 435, intellectual property, Kerrie Round, Larissa Detmold, Martin Shanahan, misleading and deceptive, North Carolina Dental case, online service providers, public benefit test, Report from India, Report from North America, Rural Export & Trading (WA) Pty Ltd v Hahnheuser (2008) 169 FCR 583, s 45DD(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), start-ups, Swati Sharma, Thea Fabricius, therapeutic gel packs, Tom Bridges, Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), trademark owner | Leave a response

Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal update: August 2015

By journals team on August 11, 2015

The latest Part of the Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal includes the following articles: “Misattributed paternity disputes: The application of collaborative practice as an alternative to court” – Emily Kwok and Dianna T Kenny; “Artistry in mediator practice: Reflections from mediators” – Kathy Douglas and David Goodwin; “The pros, cons, and maybes of telephone mediation: A conversation about the “fourth party”” – Helen Shurven and Archie Zariski; “An alternative model for the application of intervention orders in Victoria” – Edward Davis; “The child’s voice in FDR: Mediation and child-informed practice” – Mieke Brandon and Linda Kochanski; and “Evaluating collaborative law in the Australian context” – Henry Kha.

Posted in Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal (ADRJ), Update Summaries | Tagged "fourth party" in mediation, ADRJ, alternatives to court, Archie Zariski, case notes, child-informed practice, collaborative law, collaborative practice, David Goodwin, David Spencer, Dianna T Kenny, Edward Davis, Emily Kwok, FDR, Helen Shurven, Henry Kha, intervention orders, Kathy Douglas, Linda Kochanski, Mieke Brandon, misattributed paternity, parenting arrangements, telephone mediation, Victorian Magistrates' Court | Leave a response

Legal - Australia Thomson Reuters

David Goodwin

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: December 2015

Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal update: August 2015

Keep Updated via Email

About Journals Talk

Resources

Our Communities