The latest Part of the Building and Construction Law Journal includes the following articles: “The period of limitation in Victorian building actions” – David Levin; “Validity of premature adjudication applications: Challenges in Singapore’s approach” – Sze Hui Jasmine Low; and “Contract is king and time bars that bite: CMA Assets Pty Ltd v John Holland Pty Ltd [No 6]  WASC 217” – David Ulbrick. Also in this Part are Reports on the following cases: Laing O’Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd v Samsung C & T Corporation; Lamio Masonry Services Pty Ltd v TP Projects Pty Ltd; and Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd.
The June 2012 issue of the Building and Construction Law Journal includes three interesting articles covering a range of topics related to building and construction law. The first article is by AA de Fina and looks at developments in arbitration in Australia. The second article comes from David Ulbrick and Edward Harrison and discusses the enforcement of upstream duties relating to OHS in Victoria. The final article is by Andrew Murray and discusses moral rights in the context of the construction industry and provides some practical suggestions as to how the processes envisioned by the Copyright Act 1968 may work in practice. There are also two Reports, an editorial and a book review.