The latest Part of the Company and Securities Law Journal includes the following articles: “Agribusiness MIS Failures: Policy Lessons from the Quintis Failure” – Kevin Davis and Henry Herkes; “Director Restriction: An Alternative to Disqualification for Corporate Insolvency” – Michelle Welsh and Helen Anderson; Hong Kong, China and South East Asia – Say Goo: “Unfair Prejudice and Just and Equitable Winding Up in Hong Kong” – Professor Say H Goo and Charles KN Lam; Takeovers and Public Securities – Simon McKeon and Jonathan Farrer: “New Cross-Border M&A Transactions: Schemes of Arrangement for Foreign Incorporated Companies in Australia” – Anthony Papamatheos; Company Law – Edmund Finnane: “Removal of Directors of Public Companies by Shareholders: When Do Companies Contract Out of the Corporations Act?” – Rosemary Teele Langford and Ian Ramsay; and New Zealand and South Pacific – Gordon R Walker: “Compromises with Creditors – New Zealand Supreme Court Divided on Whether Class Composition Includes Consideration of Creditors’ Economic Interests” – Victoria Stace.
Posted in Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "restricted directorships", "unfair prejudice", agribusiness managed investment schemes (MIS) failures, Anthony Papamatheos, arrangement schemes for foreign incorporated companies, C&SLJ, Charles KN Lam, Company law, compromises with creditors, consideration of creditors' economic interests, disqualification of directors involved in multiple corporate failures, Editorial, Edmund Finnane, Gordon R Walker, Helen Anderson, Henry Herkes, Hong Kong China and South East Asia, Ian Ramsay, Jonathan Farrer, just and equitable ground, Kevin Davis, Michelle Welsh, new cross-border M&A Transactions, New Zealand and South Pacific, Professor Say H Goo, Rosemary Teele Langford, Say Goo, shareholders removing directors of public companies, Simon McKeon, Takeovers and public securities, Victoria Stace |
The latest Part of the Company and Securities Law Journal includes the following articles: “The Corporation and Corporate Culture: A New Paradigm?” – Andrew Clarke; “Knowing Assistance: Disgorgement of Future Anticipated Profits, Causation and Quantum” – James O’Hara; and “Crowd-sourced Equity Funding in Australia – Getting It Right” – Georgia Parletta. This issue also includes the following sections: Editorial; Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia: “More Business Opportunities or Higher Legal Risks under the Belt and Road Initiative and the Greater Bay Area Initiative? Rethinking of Information Disclosure for Chinese Companies” – Professor Say H Goo and Dr Heather Lee; and Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: “Companies, Corporate Officers and Public Interests: Are We at a Legal Tipping Point?” – Pamela Hanrahan.
Posted in Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged Andrew Clarke, anticipated profits from breaches in fiduciary duty, Australian CSF framework, C&SLJ, Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility, corporate governance and public interest, Corporations Amendment (Crowd-sourced Funding) Act 2017 (Cth), crowd-sourced equity funding (CSF), definition of "corporate culture", Dr Heather Lee, Editorial, Edmund Finnane, Georgia Parletta, Hong Kong Singapore and Malaysia, information disclosure for Chinese companies, James O’Hara, Jean du Plessis, Pamela Hanrahan, Say Goo |
The latest Part of the Company and Securities Law Journal includes the following articles: “Piercing the Corporate Veil to Reach the Money for Employees: Why, How and Where to Next?” – Helen Anderson; “A Legal Identity for Mutuals – Distinguishing between Profit and Purpose” – Ann Apps; and “Country-by-Country Tax Reporting: A Critical Analysis of Enhanced Regulatory Requirements for Multinational Corporations” – Adrian Sawyer and Kerrie Sadiq. This issue also includes the following sections: Editorial; and Directors’ Duties: “Does s 191 of the Corporations Act Include Conflicting Duties?” – Rosemary Teele Langford and Ian Ramsay.
Posted in Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged Adrian Sawyer, Ann Apps, C&SLJ, corporate law reforms recommended by Hammond Review, Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), country-by-country reporting (CbCR), definition of "mutual entity" in the Corporations Act, directors' duties, distinction between mutual from investor-owned company, Dr Rosemary Teele Langford, draft Bill to combat illegal phoenix activity, Editorial, Edmund Finnane, enhanced regulatory requirements for multinational corporations, Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act), Helen Anderson, Ian Ramsay, Kerrie Sadiq, legal identity for mutuals, piercing the corporate veil, S 191 of the Corporations Act |
The latest Part of the Company and Securities Law Journal includes the following articles: “‘Truth in Takeovers’ for Substantial Holders” – Emma Armson; “An Empirical Analysis of Intangible Asset Reporting Practices by Large Australian Listed Entities” – Professor Tony Ciro and Dr Bulend Terzioglu; and “An Analysis of the Enforcement of the Statutory Duty of Care by ASIC” – Ian M Ramsay and Benjamin B Saunders. This issue also includes the following sections: Editorial; Corporate Insolvency – Helen Anderson: “High Tide for Deeds of Company Arrangement? A Critical Review and Comment on Mighty River International Ltd v Hughes (2018) 92 ALJR 822; [2018] HCA 38” – Christopher Chiam; and Corporate Finance – Matthew Broderick: “Set-Off and the PPSA Revisited” – Anthony Duggan.
Posted in Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "truth in takeovers" policy in ASIC Regulatory Guide 25, Anthony Duggan, Benjamin B Saunders, C&SLJ, Christopher Chiam, Corporate Finance, Corporate insolvency, Dr Bulend Terzioglu, Edmund Finnane, Emma Armson, enforcement of statutory duty by ASIC, Helen Anderson, Ian M Ramsay, intangible asset reporting by S&P/ASX 100 listed entities, Matthew Broderick, Mighty River International Ltd v Hughes (2018) 92 ALJR 822; [2018] HCA 38, PPSA revisited, Professor Tony Ciro |
The latest Part of the Company and Securities Law Journal includes the following articles: “Is Say-on-Pay the Answer to Executive Remuneration Problems in New Zealand?” – Tameela Bandara; “Australian Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Corporate Governance” – Dr Bobae Choi, Dr Doowon Lee and Dr Michael Seamer; and “Misleading and Deceptive Conduct in Global Financial Markets: Implications for Regulators, Financial Intermediaries and Credit Rating Agencies” – Professor Tony Ciro. This issue also includes the following sections: Editorial; Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia: “Supporting Fintech and SME Fundraising in Hong Kong” – Say Goo.
Posted in Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "say-on-pay", Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) risk management practices, C&SLJ, Dr Bobae Choi, Dr Doowon Lee, Dr Gordon Walker, Dr Michael Seamer, Editorial, Edmund Finnane, executive remuneration problems in New Zealand, global financial crisis credit rating agencies (CRAs), Hong Kong Singapore and Malaysia, Professor Tony Ciro, Say Goo, supporting fintech and SME fundraising in Hong Kong, Tameela Bandara |
Thomson Reuters is very pleased to welcome Edmund Finnane to his new role as General Editor of the Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), taking over from the late Professor Robert “Bob” Baxt, who was the Founding Editor of the Journal. Edmund is a barrister at Thirteen Wentworth Selborne Chambers in Sydney and a Director of the Commercial Law Association of Australia. Edmund is the co-author of the books Pleading Precedents and Equity Practice and Precedents, the 2019 edition (2nd) of which is to be published shortly. He has also had articles published in the Law Society Journal and the Commercial Law Quarterly, and has been writing annotations for the Corporations Legislation volumes of Thomson Reuters since 2010.
The latest Part of the Company and Securities Law Journal includes the following articles: “The Penalty Quantum for Non-compliance with Corporate Disclosure: Solace for the Market” – Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, Thu Phuong Truong and Michelle Welsh; “An Analysis of Challenges to ASIC’s s 920A Banning Orders against Financial Services Providers in the AAT and the Courts” – Dr Robin Bowley; “Related Party Dealings Out of Managed Investment Schemes: Four Quandaries Addressed” – Tom Clarke; and “Risky Business and the Safe Harbour: Evaluating the Insolvent Trading Reform from a Creditor Perspective” – Emma Norton. This issue also includes the following sections: Editorial by Edmund Finnane; and Directors’ Duties – Dr Rosemary Teele Langford: “A Reconsideration of s 1324(10) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): Damages in Lieu of an Injunction” – Dr Katy Barnett.
Posted in Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Avestra Asset Management Ltd, banning orders against financial services providers in the AAT, C&SLJ, damages in lieu of an injunction, directors' duties, Dr Katy Barnett, Dr Robin Bowley, Dr Rosemary Teele Langford, Editorial, Edmund Finnane, Emma Norton, insolvent trading reform, Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, managed investment schemes (MISs), Michelle Welsh, New Zealand regulations for mandatory disclosure and compliance, penalty for breach of corporate disclosure, Pt 5C.7 MIS framework, reconsideration of s 1324(10) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 588G of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 920A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Thu Phuong Truong, Tom Clarke, Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Enterprise Incentives No 2) Act 2017 (Cth) |
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.