The Spring 2015 Part of the Workplace Review includes the following content: “Regulation of union ballots in Australia – a reflection” – Keith Harvey; “Sections 433 and 561 of the Corporations Act: Priority to payment of employee entitlements?” – John-Paul Redmond; “‘Bullying’ in common law litigation” – Lachlan Robison; as well as the following sections: Focus on Queensland: “Gramotnev v Queensland University of Technology” – Geraldine Dann; Interview: “Doing it his way: Martin Ferguson steps out of Labor’s shadow” – by Steven Andrew; Common Law and General Protections: “Identifying the prohibited reason for adverse action, rears its problematic head again” – Mark Caile and Dr Victoria Lambropoulos; Book Review: Hogs & Sybarites, “When We Were Young & Foolish” – reviewed by Ed Day; The Last Word; and Diary.
Posted in Update Summaries, Workplace Review (WR) | Tagged “court-controlled” ballots, accrued leave entitlements, anti-Communist, Australian Labor Party (ALP) conferences, Balla J, book review, bullying, Common Law and General Protections, common law litigation, Diary, Dr Victoria Lambropoulos, Ed Day, Editorial, employee entitlements, external administration, Focus on Queensland, Geraldine Dann, Gramotnev v Queensland University of Technology [2015] QCA 127, Interview, Jeffrey Phillips SC, John-Paul Redmond, Keith Harvey, Lachlan Robison, Lal v Australian Administrative Services Pty Ltd, Mark Caile, Martin Ferguson, negligence, priority of payment, prohibited reason for adverse action, receivership, regulation of union election ballots, ss 433 and 561 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Steven Andrew, The Last Word, When We Were Young & Foolish, WR |
The latest Part of the Insolvency Law Journal includes the following articles: “How does s 588FA apply to the granting of a security interest over an unsecured debt?” – Peter Sise; and “External administration in corporate insolvency and reorganisation: The insider alternative” – Larelle Chapple and James Routledge; and the following section notes: Recent Developments: “Barriers to entry and exit for Australian businesses: The solvency impact of disruption” – David Morrison; and Report from New Zealand: “Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “value” in the defence against insolvent transaction claims – Allied Concrete Ltd v Meltzer and Hayward as Liquidators of Window Holdings Ltd (in liq)” – Trish Keeper.
Posted in Insolvency Law Journal (Insolv LJ), Update Summaries | Tagged corporate insovlency, Dr David Morrison, external administration, Insolv LJ, insolvent transaction claims, James Routledge, Larelle Chapple, Lynne Taylor, Peter Sise, recent developments, Report from New Zealand, s 588FA, security interest, Trish Keeper, unsecured debt |