The latest Part of the Public Law Review includes the following content: Comments: “The Law Officers of the Commonwealth” – Gabrielle Appleby; “Third Party Electioneering on New Zealand’s Broadcast Media” – Andrew Geddis; Speech: “Rights and Freedoms and the Rule of Law” – The Hon Robert French AC; and the following Articles: “Towards Indigenous–Settler Federalism” – Dylan Lino; “The Masking of Judicial Power Values: Historical Analogies and Double Function Provisions” – James Stellios; “Adequacy of Risk Assessment in the Exercise of the Character Cancellation Power under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)” – Joel Townsend; and Developments.
Posted in Journals, Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged "legal unreasonableness" arguments in judicial review, 2017 Victoria Law Foundation Oration, Andrew Geddis, Australia's win on tobacco plain packaging laws, cancellation and refusal decisions, CEDAW, character cancellation power, Comments, Commonwealth law officers, constitutional recognition, Cotterill v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 240 FCR 29, developments, Dylan Lino, exercise of judicial power, First Nations Constitutional Convention, Gabrielle Appleby, Hon Robert French AC, human rights compatibility concerns for post-sentence preventative detention scheme for high-risk terrorist offenders, Indigenous peoplehood recognition, James Stellios, Joel Townsend, judicial power, judicial review, legal personhood for Whanganui River, Makarrata Commission, Migration Act 1958 (Cth), Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Kumar [2017] HCA 11, Minister for Indigenous Affairs v MJD Foundation [2017] FCAFC 37, Moana v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 230 FCR 367, NZ electoral laws, Offshore Processing Centres, PLR, political donations, Productivity Commission Inquiry into GST Distribution, Re Day (No 2) [2017] HCA 14, Re Day [2017] HCATrans 86 (19 April 2017), refusal on “character” grounds, rights and freedoms, risk of reoffending, Speech, Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 225 FCR 424, Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 (NZ), Uluru Statement from the Heart, UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, visas, WTO Dispute Settlement Panel |
The latest part of the Public Law Review includes the following Comments: “The constitutionality of draft legislation banning the wearing of face veils and similar clothing” – Mitchell Landrigan; and “Commonwealth spending after Williams (No 2): Has the new dawn risen?” – Andrew Lynch; and the following articles: “The impact of uncertain constitutional norms on government policy: Tribunal design after Kirk” – Gabrielle Appleby and Anna Olijnyk; and “An alternative (partial) justification for the holding in Kirk” – Oscar I Roos. There is also a Developments section.
Posted in Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged Andrew Lynch, Anna Olijnyk, constitutional norms, developments, Gabrielle Appleby, Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW), Mellifont v Attorney-General (Qld), Mitchell Landrigan, Oscar I Roos, PLR, s 73 of the Constitution, State Supreme Courts, Williams (No 2) |
The latest Part of the Public Law Review includes the following articles: “An Australian spectrum of political rights scrutiny: “Continuing to lead by example?”” – Laura Grenfell; and “Resisting the siren song of the Hansen sequence: The state of Supreme Court authority on the sections 5 and 6 conundrum” – Hanna Wilberg; and the following Comments: “The 2014 counter-terrorism reforms in review” – Gabrielle Appleby; and “The use of “legislative rules” in preference to regulations: A “novel” approach?” – Stephen Argument. Also in this Part is an editorial, a book review and a Developments section.
Posted in Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged Anna Dziedzic, book review, Comments, counter-terrorism reforms, developments, Gabrielle Appleby, Hanna Willberg, Hansen v The Queen, Laura Grenfell, legislative rules, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, PLR, political rights scrutiny, regulations, Stephen Argument, Stephen Gardbaum, Supreme Court authority |
The latest Part of the Public Law Review publishes three Comments and three Articles of interest to readers. The first Comment is by Gabrielle Appleby and Matthew Stubbs who look at the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The second Comment comes from Shubhankar Dam and focuses on Tan Eng Hong v Attorney-General in Singapore. The final Comment is by Vergil Narokobi who looks at Parliament testing the supremacy of the Constitution in PNG. In the first article, Justin Gleeson SC asks what is left of Cole v Whitfield. The second article is by Dean R Knight and considers the amenability of private incorporated bodies to judicial review in New Zealand. The final article comes from Fiona Wheeler and looks at extra-judicial activity by High Court justices. There is also a Developments section.
Posted in Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged Cole v Whitfield, Comments, Dean R Knight, developments, extra-judicial activity, Fiona Wheeler, Gabrielle Appleby, Justin Gleeson SC, Matthew Stubbs, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, private incorporated bodies, Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Shubhankar Dam, Singapore, supremacy of constitution, Vergil Narokobi |
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.
Public Law Review update: Vol 28 Pt 2
The latest Part of the Public Law Review includes the following content: Comments: “The Law Officers of the Commonwealth” – Gabrielle Appleby; “Third Party Electioneering on New Zealand’s Broadcast Media” – Andrew Geddis; Speech: “Rights and Freedoms and the Rule of Law” – The Hon Robert French AC; and the following Articles: “Towards Indigenous–Settler Federalism” – Dylan Lino; “The Masking of Judicial Power Values: Historical Analogies and Double Function Provisions” – James Stellios; “Adequacy of Risk Assessment in the Exercise of the Character Cancellation Power under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)” – Joel Townsend; and Developments.