Google

Home
Journals
News & Summaries
- Update Summaries
Journals Index
Subscribe & Purchase
Permissions
Submissions

Home

Google

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 28 Pt 4

By Journal Alerts on December 29, 2020

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Batter Up: ACCC Proposes Compulsory “Final Offer Arbitration” for Disputes between Media Businesses and Digital Platforms in Australia” – Sam Luttrell and Dave Poddar; and “Asset Valuation Confusion under Australia’s National Gas Rules” – Euan Morton and Matt Rodgers. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Access to Services; Defective Goods; Restrictive Trade Practices; Case Note; Council Considerations; Commission Cameos; What If …; Comments from Commerce; Report from China; and Report from India.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 45-day compulsory Final Offer Arbitration process, Access to Services, AJCCL, articles, Asset Valuation Confusion under Australia's National Gas Rules, asset valuation methodology, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Australian gas transmission pipelines, Batter Up: ACCC Proposes Compulsory Final Offer Arbitration for Disputes between Media Businesses and Digital Platforms in Australia, Bobby Jain, Case Note, Christopher Hodgekiss SC, Christopher Kok, Comments from Commerce, Commission Cameos, Competition in the Time of COVID-19, Council considerations, Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal Service – Implications for the Scope of Access Regulation, Dave Poddar, Defective Goods, Editorial, Euan Morton, Facebook, fair payment for news content, Google, Gym Equipment Higher Education Expectations and Framed Bathing Pools, Hank Spier, Information Disclosure and Arbitration Framework provisions under Pt 23 of the Australian National Gas Rules, John Hedge, Julie Clarke, Mandatory Bargaining Code, Matt Rodgers, Maureen Ip Hee Wai, Michael Gvozdenovic, Peter Strong, Pravin Anand, recovered capital method (RCM), Report from China, Report from India, Resale Price Maintenance: A Stocktake, Restrictive trade practices, Russell Miller AM, Sam Luttrell, SAMR's Approach to Failing Firms, Sharon Henrick, Stephen Puttick, T H J Cadd, The Council's Work during 2019–2020, The Rise and Fall of a Legal Principle, Travel Issues During the Pandemic, Undertakings in Merger Proceedings Following Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pacific National Pty Ltd: Has the Train Left the Station?, Updates from Competition Law Regime for the Year 2019–2020, What If Australia Took More Notice of EU Competition Law?, What if... | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 25 Pt 2

By Journal Alerts on June 15, 2017

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Proving Misleading or Deceptive Conduct: Challenges Posed by the Internet” – Adrian Coorey; “Influencers, Instagurus, and Enablers: Using Accessorial Liability to Establish a Norm of Behaviour in Relation to Disguised Viral Marketing” – Lynden Griggs and Aviva Freilich; “Extracting Value from Big Data: Taking Big Data Processing and Analysis into Account” – Suiyi Zhang; Access to Services; Case Note: Tribunal Tableaux; Consumer Concerns; What If…; Comments from Commerce; Report from Russia; Report from New Zealand; and Benchmarks.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "Because of the conduct", "Knowingly concerned", "Particular purpose … that the consumer makes known", "Request", "Undue", abusing dominant position, ACCC v Reckitt Benckiser (Aust) Pty Ltd [2016] ATPR 42-530; [2016] FCAFC 181, Access to Services, accessorial liability, Adrian Coorey, AJCCL, Australian Competition Tribunal, Aviva Freilich, Benchmarks, big data, business community, Case Note, civil penalties, Comments from Commerce, Commerce Act 1986 (NZ), Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Consumer concerns, disguised viral marketing, DP World Sydney Ltd v Guy (2016) 262 IR 156; [2016] NSWSC 1072, Editorial, enablers, Evgeny Khokhlov, Fair Trading Act 1986 (NZ), Google, influencers, information collection online, informed consent online, instagurus, internet, Jeremy Riddle, John Hedge, Lindsay Trotman, Lynden Griggs, Matthew Barry, Matthew Berkahn, merchantable quality, misleading or deceptive conduct, online advertising, online commercial transactions, Peter Strong, price monitoring, privacy information, processing and analysis, Report from New Zealand, Report from Russia, restraint of trade clauses, Ron Desiatnik, Russell Miller AM, Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service, s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law, Suiyi Zhang, Tim Luxton, Tribunal Tableaux, trigger for Australian competition liability, What if... | Leave a response

Announcing the 2013 AIPJ essay competition winners

By journals team on March 12, 2014

Thomson Reuters and the General Editor of the Australian Intellectual Property Journal, Associate Professor David Lindsay, are pleased to announce that Johnathon Liddicoat and James Longden are the joint winners of the 2013 Australian Intellectual Property Journal essay competition. Reflecting the high level and record number of entries received in 2013, the judging panel, consisting of the ...more