Harper Report

Home
Journals
News & Summaries
- Update Summaries
Journals Index
Subscribe & Purchase
Permissions
Submissions

Home

Harper Report

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: June 2016

By Journal Alerts on June 17, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Are gas processing facilities ‘safe’ from third party access?” – Leanne McClurg; “Unilateral conduct and the role of the purpose test in section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)” – Dr Shirley Quo; and “Everyone beware: A comparative study of consumer protection in Chinese and Australian mobile commerce” – Mary Ip; and the following sections: Authorisations and notifications; Consumer protection; Case Note; Consumer Concerns; Economic(s) Matters; Report from Russia; and Odds and Ends.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged “take advantage” requirement, AJCCL, Alex Sundakov, Authorisations and notifications, Beijing Qihoo Technology Co Ltd v Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd, Bernard McCabe, broadband performance, Carolyn Oddie, Case Note, Chinese mobile commerce, comparative study, Consumer concerns, Consumer Protection, Dr Shirley Quo, Economic(s) Matters, Editorial, Evgeny Khokhlov, exemption, free range eggs, gas processing facilities, Harper Report, Harper Review, ihail Pty Ltd, Justin Lipinski, Leanne McClurg, Mary Ip, misuse of market power, Molly Snaith, Odds and Ends, Pt IIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), purpose test, Rachel Thomas, Report from Russia, s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Stephanie Hayes, third party access, unilateral conduct | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: March 2016

By Journal Alerts on March 20, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Could the Harper Review recommendations revive private enforcement of cartel prohibitions?” – Rebecca Gilsenan; “Place names as marketing tools: Legal issues in the use of geographic names” – Neil Francey; and “Are we there yet? A return to the rational for Australian consumer protection” – Brenton Lee Worth; and the following sections: Access to Services; Telecommunications; Case Notes; Tribunal Tableaux; Council Considerations; Energy Etchings; Snapshots; Report from Europe; Report from New Zealand; and Book Review.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2013] ATPR 42-452, ACCC v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 103, AJCCL, Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: Leniency Religion, Australian Competition Tribunal, Australian Energy Regulator (AER), book review, Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2015] VSC 352, Brenton Lee Worth, business names, Caron Beaton-Wells, case notes, Christopher Hodgekiss SC, Christopher Tran, Commerce Commission (NZ), comparative advertising, competitive advertising, copyright, Council considerations, Damien O'Brien QC, Debra Wilson, declaration criterion, Douglas Shirrefs, e-commerce sector inquiry, Editorial, Energy etchings, European Commission, Flight Centre Ltd v ACCC (2015) 234 FCR 367; [2015] FCAFC 104, Harper Report, Harper Review, Holly Raiche, Jennifer Hambleton, Jessica Rusten, John Hedge, Jonathan de Ridder, national access regime, Neil Francey, Niloufer Selvadurai, passing off, Paula Conboy, Peeta Hutson, Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal (2012) 246 CLR 379, place names legislation, private enforcement of cartel laws, procedural fairness, R J Desiatnik, Raymond Roca, Rebecca Gilsenan, Reckitt Benckiser (Aust) Pty Ltd v Proctor & Gamble Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 753, Report from Europe, Report from New Zealand, Snapshots, Telecommunications Competition Notice Guidelines, Tom Pick, trade marks, Tribunal Tableaux, unfair contract term legislation | Leave a response

Australian Business Law Review update: February 2016

By Journal Alerts on March 20, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Business Law Review includes the following articles: “No more Mr Nice Guy: The implied duty to cooperate and remedying another party’s mistaken breach” – Matthew Lees; “Corporate law reform in Australia: An analysis of the influence of ownership structures and corporate failure” – Vivien Chen, Ian Ramsay and Michelle Welsh; and “Section 92 of the Australian Constitution: The next phase” – Anthony Gray. Also in this Part are the following sections: Contracts and Restitution: “High Court declines to clarify the Codelfa ‘ambiguity principle'” – Troy Keily; and Privacy: “Private life in a digital world” by Margaret Jackson and Gordon Hughes – book review by Lauren Anderson.

Posted in Australian Business Law Review (ABLR), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 2015 Productivity Commission report, ABLR, access to justice arrangements, authorisation of mergers, Business Set Up Transfer and Closure, Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales [1982] HCA 24, Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 312 ALR 356, Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union v Director Fair Work and Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46, corporate ownership structures, Department of Industry and Science, Editorial, Electricity Generation Corp v Woodside Energy Ltd [2014] HCA 7, extrinsic evidence, Famestock Pty Ltd v Body Corporate for No 9 Port Douglas Road Community Title Scheme 24368 [2013] QCA 354, Gordon Hughes, Harper Report, Hon John Dyson Heydon AC QC, Ian Ramsay, implied duty to cooperate, Innovations Policy Report, Insolvency, Insolvency Law Reform Bill, interest groups, Lauren Anderson, Margaret Jackson, Matthew Lees, Michael Borsky, Michelle Welsh, Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37, Private life in a digital world, Professor Anthony Gray, Professor Normann Witzleb, Professor Robert Baxt AO, remedy mistaken breach of contract, restitution, Royal Commission of the Trade Union Governance and Corruption, Royal Commissioner John Dyson Heydon AC QC, s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), s 92 of the Constitution, shareholder protection, Troy Keily, Vivien Chen, Wolfe v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2013] VSCA 331 | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: September 2015

By journals team on September 21, 2015

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Unconscionable conduct in equity and under statute: The Australian Consumer Law and the Lux decision” – Hayden Fielder; and “Government exemption from competition and consumer law: Has Harper patched the holes?” – Nick Seddon; and the following sections: Access to Services; Authorisations and Notifications; Consumer Protection; Unconscionable Conduct and Codes of Conduct; Case Notes; Commission Cameos; Report from Africa; Report from Latin America; and Odds and Ends

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd, Access to Services, AJCCL, Authorisations and notifications, case notes, Commission Cameos, competition and consumer law, Consumer Protection, government exemption, Harper Report, Hayden Fielder, Nick Seddon, Odds and Ends, Report from Africa, Report from Latin America, Unconscionable Conduct and Codes of Conduct, unconsionable conduct | Leave a response

Australian Business Law Review update: April 2015

By journals team on April 17, 2015

The latest Part of the Australian Business Law Review includes the following articles: “Information exchange, hub and spoke arrangements and collusion” – Rhonda L Smith and Arlen Duke; “Reinvigorating the trade and commerce power” – Anthony Gray; “Could Canadian-style interest arbitration work in Australia?” – Anthony Forsyth; “The duty to act in the best interests of the public entity – a regulatory analysis” – Marco Bini; and “Issues at the end of a franchising relationship” – Andrew Terry and Maree Chetwin. There is also an editorial and an Insurance Law section.