The latest Part of the Australian Intellectual Property Journal includes the following articles: “Do Wrongs Make a (Copy)right? Illegal Works and Copyright Subsistence Under Australian Law” – Jordan Leahy and Jani McCutcheon; “If Value Then Right? Copyright and Works of Non-human Authorship” – Dilan Thampapillai; and “Limiting Access, Limited Blocking: Evidence and Practice in s 115A Injunctions” – Rob Nicholls. There is also an Editorial by Dianne Nicol and an Obituary for Vale Jim Lahore.
Posted in Australian Intellectual Property Journal (AIPJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged AIPJ, articles, artificial intelligence, copyright, copyright subsistence, Dianne Nicol, Dilan Thampapillai, disable access to online services, Do Wrongs Make a (Copy)right? Illegal Works and Copyright Subsistence Under Australian Law, Editorial, If Value Then Right? Copyright and Works of Non-human Authorship, infringement, Jani McCutcheon, Jordan Leahy, Limited Blocking: Evidence and Practice in s 115A Injunctions, Limiting Access, Obituary, Rob Nicholls, Section 115A of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), Vale Jim Lahore |
The latest part of the Australian Intellectual Property Journal publishes four interesting articles on a range of topics. The first article is by Ann L Monotti and examines the scope and meaning of the statutory tort for infringement of a patent by authorisation. The second article comes from Ella O’Sullivan who considers the current European and Australian positions regarding the patentability of human embryonic stem cells. The third article is by Belinda Huang who critically examines why Parliament failed to introduce an ethical exclusion against patentability in recent legislative changes. The final article comes from Dan Jerker B Svantesson and seeks to highlight how privacy is affected by, and affects, the application of copyright law in the context of online copyright piracy.
Posted in Australian Intellectual Property Journal (AIPJ), Update Summaries | Tagged AIPJ, Ann L Monotti, Belinda Huang, biotech patents, Brüstle v Greenpeace eV, Dan Jerker B Svantesson, Ella O'Sullivan, human embryonic stem cells, iiNet case, infringement, Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012 (Cth), online copyright, patent, piracy, privacy |