Jonathan de Ridder

Home
Journals
News & Summaries
- Update Summaries
Journals Index
Subscribe & Purchase
Permissions
Submissions

Home

Jonathan de Ridder

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 25 Pt 3

By Journal Alerts on September 18, 2017

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Digital Wallets and Consumer Protection” – Kanchana Kariyawasam and Matthew Tsai; “Problems with Free-range Labelling of Australian Eggs: Hatching a Viable Solution” – Samantha Denford; Defective Goods; Case Notes; Council Considerations; Economic(s) Matters; Report from China; Report from Europe; Worth Repeating; and Odds and Ends.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged abuse of dominant market position, ACCC v Flight Centre Travel Group Ltd (2016) 91 ALJR 143; [2016] HCA 49, AJCCL, Alex Sundakov, Apple IOS Updates, Art 17(1)(vii) of the Anti-monopoly Law (AML), boundary between monopoly and competition, case notes, Chinese competition regulators, Christopher Hodgekiss SC, consumer protection laws, conventional market designs, Council considerations, Defective Goods, Diana Biscoe, digital payment systems, digital wallets, Economic(s) Matters, Editorial, Final Report on the E-Commerce Sector in Europe, free-range eggs labelling, Jilly Cohen, Jonathan de Ridder, Kanchana Kariyawasam, Ketki Kotwal, leniency applications, loyalty discounts, Matthew Tsai, national access regime, Odds and Ends, Re Sea Swift Pty Ltd [2016] ACompT 9, Report from China, Report from Europe, Samantha Denford, Sharon Henrick, Simon Englebert, State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC), Susan Ning, Tetra Pak, Thermo Fisher/Life Technologies case, Thomas Cadd, tied sales, Tom S Pick, Worth repeating | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: March 2016

By Journal Alerts on March 20, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Could the Harper Review recommendations revive private enforcement of cartel prohibitions?” – Rebecca Gilsenan; “Place names as marketing tools: Legal issues in the use of geographic names” – Neil Francey; and “Are we there yet? A return to the rational for Australian consumer protection” – Brenton Lee Worth; and the following sections: Access to Services; Telecommunications; Case Notes; Tribunal Tableaux; Council Considerations; Energy Etchings; Snapshots; Report from Europe; Report from New Zealand; and Book Review.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2013] ATPR 42-452, ACCC v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 103, AJCCL, Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: Leniency Religion, Australian Competition Tribunal, Australian Energy Regulator (AER), book review, Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd v CFMEU [2015] VSC 352, Brenton Lee Worth, business names, Caron Beaton-Wells, case notes, Christopher Hodgekiss SC, Christopher Tran, Commerce Commission (NZ), comparative advertising, competitive advertising, copyright, Council considerations, Damien O'Brien QC, Debra Wilson, declaration criterion, Douglas Shirrefs, e-commerce sector inquiry, Editorial, Energy etchings, European Commission, Flight Centre Ltd v ACCC (2015) 234 FCR 367; [2015] FCAFC 104, Harper Report, Harper Review, Holly Raiche, Jennifer Hambleton, Jessica Rusten, John Hedge, Jonathan de Ridder, national access regime, Neil Francey, Niloufer Selvadurai, passing off, Paula Conboy, Peeta Hutson, Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal (2012) 246 CLR 379, place names legislation, private enforcement of cartel laws, procedural fairness, R J Desiatnik, Raymond Roca, Rebecca Gilsenan, Reckitt Benckiser (Aust) Pty Ltd v Proctor & Gamble Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 753, Report from Europe, Report from New Zealand, Snapshots, Telecommunications Competition Notice Guidelines, Tom Pick, trade marks, Tribunal Tableaux, unfair contract term legislation | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: March 2014

By journals team on March 3, 2015

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “In competition with each other? Implications of the apparently divergent outcomes in Flight Centre and ANZ” – Andrew Christopher and Thea Fabricius; “Vertical merger analysis in the United States, Europe and Australia” – Paul McLachlan; and “Consumer guarantees – lessons to be learnt from afar” – Lynden Griggs, Aviva Freilich and Nicolas Messel. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Authorisations and Notifications; Telecommunications; Case Note; Tribunal Tableaux; Council Considerations; and Report from Europe.