misuse of market power

Australian Business Law Review update: Vol 45 Pt 2

By Journal Alerts on April 6, 2017

The latest Part of the Australian Business Law Review includes an Editorial by Professor Bob Baxt AO. It also contains the following articles: “Strategically Deterring Generic Entry Ahead of Patent Expiry: A Competition Law Antidote? Assessing Australian Pharmaceutical Antitrust Enforcement after ACCC v Pfizer” – Colette Downie; “Marine Insurance Law Reform in Australia – a Following Sea” – Julie-Anne Tarr; “Registered Charities and Governance Standard 5: An Evaluation” – Ian Ramsay and Miranda Webster; and “Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission: Enforcement Tools and Regulatory Approach” – Marina Nehme. Also in this Part is the following section: Privacy Law: “‘Personal information’ under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) – Privacy Commissioner v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2017] FCAFC 4” – Normann Witzleb.

Posted in Australian Business Law Review (ABLR), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged ABLR, ACCC v Pfizer, Antitrust Enforcement, Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC), Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 323 ALR 429; [2015] FCA 113, Colette Downie, competition law, Editorial, generic entry, governance standard 5, Ian Ramsay, Insurance Act 2015 (UK), Julie-Anne Tarr, Marina Nehme, Marine Insurance Act 1906 (UK), marine insurance law reform, Miranda Webster, misuse of market power, Normann Witzleb, patent expiry, patent settlement agreements (PSAs), personal information, pharmaceutical patentees, Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), Privacy Commissioner v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2017] FCAFC 4, privacy law, Professor Robert Baxt AO, registered charities, responsible entities, Standard 5 | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: December 2016

By Journal Alerts on November 23, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Margin Squeezes as a Misuse of Market Power” – Paul McLachlan; “‘Your Rights Mob’: Making Indigenous Consumer Protection an Enduring Priority” – Rod Sims; “How Will the Enforcement of Section 46 of the CCA Change under the Full Harper?” – Sophie Matthiesson; and the following sections: Defective Goods; Case Note; Commission Cameos; Report from India; Report from Latin America; and Odds and Ends.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "Your Rights Mob", “effects test”, “taking advantage of” requirement, “the Full Harper”, Aarthi Sridharan, Abhilasha Nautiyal, ACCC v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia SRL (No 12) [2016] FCA 822, AJCCL, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), cartel conduct, Case Note, Claribel Medina, Commission Cameos, Competition Act 2000 (India), Competition Commission of India (CCI), competition policies, Defective Goods, Editorial, Emilia Cadenas, free range eggs, Hank Spier, Harper Review, Indigenous consumer protection, Juan Mercant, Luis Eduardo Nieto, Luis Omar Guerrero Rodriguez, margin squeezes, Marianne Windirsch, Martin F Michaus, misuse of market power, Odds and Edds, Paul McLachlan, Peta Stevenson, Report from India, Report from Latin America, Rod Sims, section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA), Sophie Matthiesson, Swati Sharma, T H J Cadd | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: September 2016

By Journal Alerts on September 8, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Australia’s Protected Cartel Information Scheme: Has the Right Balance Been Struck?” – Holly Yang Cao; and “The ACCC, the Internet and Extraterritorial Injunctions” – Adrian Coorey; and the following sections: Access to Services; Administration and National Competition Policy; Case Note; What If…; Consumer Concerns; Report from Asia; Report from North America; and Worth Repeating.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC v Yazaki Corp (No 2) [2015] FCA 1304, Access Regulation, Access to Services, Administration and National Competition Policy, ADR processes, Adrian Coorey, AJCCL, Antitrust Enforcement, ASEAN, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Business-to-Business Disputes, Caroline Michel, Case Note, Christopher Pleatsikas, Consumer concerns, Extraterritorial Injunctions, Frank Zumbo, Holly Yang Cao, Indirect Causation, internet, Jessica Rusten, John Hedge, Ketki Kowal, lemon cars, misuse of market power, Monopoly Pricing, Protected Cartel Information Scheme, Rachel Burgess, Report from Asia, Report from North America, Russell Miller AM, Sarah Agar, Shila Dorai Raj, Small and medium enterprises (SMEs), United States, What if..., Worth repeating | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: June 2016

By Journal Alerts on June 17, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Are gas processing facilities ‘safe’ from third party access?” – Leanne McClurg; “Unilateral conduct and the role of the purpose test in section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)” – Dr Shirley Quo; and “Everyone beware: A comparative study of consumer protection in Chinese and Australian mobile commerce” – Mary Ip; and the following sections: Authorisations and notifications; Consumer protection; Case Note; Consumer Concerns; Economic(s) Matters; Report from Russia; and Odds and Ends.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged “take advantage” requirement, AJCCL, Alex Sundakov, Authorisations and notifications, Beijing Qihoo Technology Co Ltd v Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd, Bernard McCabe, broadband performance, Carolyn Oddie, Case Note, Chinese mobile commerce, comparative study, Consumer concerns, Consumer Protection, Dr Shirley Quo, Economic(s) Matters, Editorial, Evgeny Khokhlov, exemption, free range eggs, gas processing facilities, Harper Report, Harper Review, ihail Pty Ltd, Justin Lipinski, Leanne McClurg, Mary Ip, misuse of market power, Molly Snaith, Odds and Ends, Pt IIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), purpose test, Rachel Thomas, Report from Russia, s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Stephanie Hayes, third party access, unilateral conduct | Leave a response

Australian Business Law Review update: April 2016

By Journal Alerts on May 16, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Business Law Review includes the following articles: “The evolution of the ‘substantial lessening of competition’ test – a review of case law” – Peter Armitage; “Do workplace policies form part of employment contracts? A working guide and advice for employers” – Mark Giancaspro; “Unravelling the muddles of summary dismissal under contracts of employment” – Victoria Lambropoulos; and “Research collaborations and ‘authorship’: Differentiating legal from management norms” – Elizabeth Adeney. Also in this Part is the following section: Banking and Finance: “Bankruptcy, social security and long term poverty: results from a survey of financial counsellors and consumer solicitors” – Paul Ali, Lucinda O’Brien and Ian Ramsay.

Posted in Australian Business Law Review (ABLR), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged Assoc Prof Paul Ali, authorship in scientific research, Banking and finance, bankruptcy rates, C&SLJ, company culture, continuous disclosure provisions, contract of employment, creditor hardship programs, Dr Victoria Lambropoulos, Editorial, Elizabeth Adeney, financial counsellors, financial hardship, Harper Review, Ian Ramsay, Infringement Notice (IN) regime, institutional authorship guidelines, intellectual property ownership, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), legal liability for employers and employees, Lucinda O'Brien, Mark Giancaspro, Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner (2015) 229 FCR 221, middle class bankruptcy, misuse of market power, penalties, personal insolvency system, Peter Armitage, Professor Robert Baxt AO, research collaboration, scientific literature, social security, substantial lessening of competition test, summary dismissal of employees, workplace policy and employment contract | Leave a response

Australian Business Law Review update: October 2014

By journals team on November 4, 2014

The latest Part of the Australian Business Law Review includes the following material: “Uncovering the roots of Australia’s misuse of market power provision: Is it time to reconsider?” – Katharine Kemp; “Corporate whistleblowing: Public lessons for private disclosure” – Sulette Lombard and Vivienne Brand; ““Flogging a dead horse”: Artificial insemination, breeding standards and antitrust” – Shirley Quo; “Should the practical benefit principle extend to contract formation?” – Mark Giancaspro; Consumer Dealings: “Inquiry into Micro-economic reform in Western Australia” – Chris Field and Tracey Atkins; Privacy: “A seed on barren ground? the ALRC’s recommendation for a statutory privacy tort” – Normann Witzleb; and book reviews of “The Construction and Performance of Commercial Contracts” by S A Christensen and W D Duncan and “The Law of Affıdavits” by John Levingston (both reviewed by Peter Lithgow).

Posted in Australian Business Law Review (ABLR), Update Summaries | Tagged ABLR, ALRC, antitrust, artificial insemination, breeding standards, Chris Field, Consumer dealings, contract formation, corporate whistleblowing, Katharine Kemp, Mark Giancaspro, misuse of market power, Normann Witzleb, Peter Lithgow, practical benefit principle, privacy, private disclosure, Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (Cth), Shirley Quo, statutory privacy tort, Sulette Lombard, Vivienne Brand | Leave a response

Legal - Australia Thomson Reuters

misuse of market power

Australian Business Law Review update: Vol 45 Pt 2

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: December 2016

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: September 2016

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: June 2016

Australian Business Law Review update: October 2014

Keep Updated via Email

About Journals Talk

Resources

Our Communities