This Special Issue of the Australian Law Journal on Religious Freedom contains the following articles: “The Future Of Religious Freedom” – Patrick Parkinson AM; “Can Australian Law Better Protect Freedom Of Religion?” – Nicholas Aroney; “Protecting Religious Freedom In A Human Rights Act” – Harry Hobbs and George Williams; “Towards Re-Thinking ‘Balancing’ In The Courts And The Legislature’s Role In Protecting Religious Liberty” – Joel Harrison; “Evidence Of Absence In The Ruddock Report” – Jeremy Patrick; “Religious Schools And Discrimination Against Staff On The Basis Of Sexual Orientation: Lessons From European Human Rights Jurisprudence” – Anja Hilkemeijer and Amy Maguire; “Religious Schools, Religious Vendors And Refusing Services After Ruddock: Diversity Or Discrimination?” – Alex Deagon; “Enforcing Conformity: Criminalising Religiously Inspired Acts” – Michael Quinlan; and “The Good Of Religion” – Joshua Neoh.
Posted in Australian Law Journal, The (ALJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "balancing" in the courts, Alex Deagon, ALJ, Amy Maguire, Anja Hilkemeijer, anti-discrimination laws, Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock, Australian exclusion zone laws against religious freedom, Australian Law Reform Commission, Current issues, discrimination against staff on the basis of sexual orientation, evidence of absence in the Ruddock Report, George Williams, Harry Hobbs, ineffectiveness of Human Rights Charters, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Siracusa Principles, Jeremy Patrick, Joel Harrison, Joshua Neoh, Justice François Kunc, legislature's role in protecting religious liberty, Michael Quinlan, Nicholas Aroney, Patrick Parkinson AM, protection of religious freedom in Australia, refusing marriage services for religious conformity, relationship between anti-discrimination principles and freedom of religion, religious freedom, Religious Freedom Review, religious schools' right to religious institutional autonomy, Ruddock Review, Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SDA), The Curated Page, the future of religious freedom |
The latest Part of the Australian Law Journal contains “Current Issues” by General Editor, the Hon Justice François Kunc. It contains the following articles: “Getting to Grips with Encroachments on Freedoms in Commonwealth Laws: The ALRC Freedoms Inquiry” – Rosalind Croucher; “Why are Decisions on Family Property so Inconsistent?” – Patrick Parkinson AM. This Part also includes the following sections: Conveyancing and Property; Overseas Law; Environmental Law; Recent Cases, Book Reviews and Obituary.
Posted in Australian Law Journal, The (ALJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged Adjudication on the Gold Fields in New South Wales and Victoria in the 19th Century, ALJ, Angelina A Gomez, Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd (2016) 90 ALJR 572; [2016] HCA 16, Australian international commercial court, Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), Badench v Calvert (2016) 90 ALJR 610; [2016] HCA 18, Book reviews, cameras in the court, Colin Picker, consolidation of titles, contracts, Conveyancing and property, Corrie Goodhand, Current issues, directors' duties, doctrinal coherence, encroachments on freedoms in Commonwealth laws, environmental law, family property, Federal Court environmental decisions, Federal environment policy, Indigenous legal issues, Intentional Tort Litigation in Australia: Assault False Imprisonment Malicious Prosecution and Related Claims, John P Hamilton, juries, Justice François Kunc, Justice Rachel Pepper, land by the sea, land under the sea, legal aid, negligence, Obituary, Overseas law, Patrick Parkinson AM, Peter Butt, Peter O’Brien, Peter Sutherland, Pioneer Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Columbus Capital Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 78, Recent cases, Robyn Creyke, Rosalind Croucher, Russell Scott AM, Ruth C A Higgins, The Australian, The Australian Financial Review, Traditional Rights and Freedoms – Encroachments by Commonwealth Laws, UK Supreme Court, Veterans’ Entitlements and Military Compensation Law, women barristers, women solicitors |
The latest Part of the Family Law Review publishes two interesting article and several different sections. The first article is by the Hon Justice Paul Brereton AM RFD in which two recent adventures of the High Court of Australia in the field of family law are considered. The second article is by Patrick Parkinson AM and considers the implications of the High Court’s decision in Stanford v Stanford. Also in this Part are the following sections: Professional Insights, Child Support, Recent Cases and Family Dispute Resolution.
Posted in Family Law Review (Fam L Rev), Update Summaries | Tagged Bookhurst v Bookhurst, child support, Fam L Rev, Family Dispute Resolution, High Court, Hon Justice Paul Brereton AM RFD, Kennon v Spry, Patrick Parkinson AM, Professional Insights, property law, Recent cases, Stanford v Stanford |
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.