The latest Part of the Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice includes the following articles: “Concepts of Loss and Proving Hypotheticals in Misleading or Deceptive Conduct” – Benjamin Teng and Andrew Simpson; and “Once Privileged, Always Privileged? An Exploration into the Applicability of Legal Professional Privilege to Inquisitorial Proceedings in New Zealand” – James Anson-Holland. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial: “A Civil Case Made Notable by the Notoriety of a Criminal Case: Burnett v International Insurance Co of Hanover Ltd” – Roderick Joyce QSO QC; and “Disregarding the Pleadings at Trial” – Michael Legg; Case Notes: “The Stema Barge II – ‘Manager’ or ‘Operator’?” – Kate Rouch; and “Privacy – Celebrity and Personal Correspondence in the United Kingdom High Court: HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd” – Lydia Wilson; and Court Watch: “Bias and Procedural Fairness at Trial” – Bernard Cairns.
Posted in Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged A Civil Case Made Notable by the Notoriety of a Criminal Case Burnett v International Insurance Co of Hanover Ltd, Andrew Simpson, arising of presumptions vis-à-vis wrongdoers, articles, Benjamin Teng, Bernard Cairns, Berry v CCL Secure Pty Ltd, Bias and Procedural Fairness at Trial, case notes, claims for damages to compensate loss caused by misleading or deceptive conduct, Concepts of Loss and Proving Hypotheticals in Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Court watch, damages for loss of opportunity, Disregarding the Pleadings at Trial, Editorial, he Stema Barge II – Manager or Operator?, historical underpinnings of legal professional privilege, Inquiries Act 2013 (NZ), inquiries and investigations, inquisitorial proceedings, inquisitorial proceedings in New Zealand, James Anson-Holland, JCivLP, Kate Rouch, Lydia Wilson, Michael Legg, Once Privileged Always Privileged? An Exploration into the Applicability of Legal Professional Privilege to Inquisitorial Proceedings in New Zealand, pleading of counterfactuals, Privacy – Celebrity and Personal Correspondence in the United Kingdom High Court HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd, Professor Michael Legg, Roderick Joyce QSO QC, shifting of evidentiary onuses |
The latest Part of the Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice includes the following articles: “Digital Property Revisited” – David J Harvey; and “Drawing a Line in the Sand – Private International Commercial Arbitrations and United States Judicial Assistance Pursuant to 28 USC § 1782” – Joshua Kang and Michael Legg. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial: “A Significant COVID-19 Court Case” – Roderick Joyce QSO QC; and “The COVID-19 Pandemic and Courts as Essential Services” – Michael Legg; and Case Notes: “Inghams Enterprises v Hannigan – Do Not Play Chicken with Imprecise Drafting” – Jeremy Quan-Sing, Jonathan Light and Caroline Swartz-Zern; and “Proprietary Rights to Fish: Borwick Development Solutions Ltd v Clear Water Fisheries Ltd” – Brittany Rorrison and William Fotherby.
Posted in Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged A Significant COVID-19 Court Case, articles, Assistance to foreign and international tribunals and to litigants before such tribunals, ature of property in the Digital Paradigm, Brittany Rorrison, Caroline Swartz-Zern, case notes, Company Insolvency, computer crimes provisions, Crimes Act 1961 (NZ), cryptocurrencies, David J Harvey, depositions, digital data, digital material, Digital Property Revisited, discovery, Dixon v The Queen, document discovery, Drawing a Line in the Sand – Private International Commercial Arbitrations and United States Judicial Assistance Pursuant to 28 USC § 1782, Editorial, Inghams Enterprises v Hannigan – Do Not Play Chicken with Imprecise Drafting, JCivLP, Jeremy Quan-Sing, Jonathan Light, Joshua Kang, Louise Beange, Michael Legg, Professor Michael Legg, Proprietary Rights to Fish: Borwick Development Solutions Ltd v Clear Water Fisheries Ltd, Roderick Joyce QSO QC, subpoenas, The COVID-19 Pandemic and Courts as Essential Services, whether or not there can be property in the contents of files on a computer and hard drive including emails, William Fotherby |
CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS for Special Issue on the 10th Anniversary of the Victorian Civil Procedure Act 2010
The Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) was enacted 10 years ago and commenced operation on 1 January 2011. It was an Act aimed at reforming and modernising the laws, practice, procedure and culture for the resolution of civil disputes in Victoria. The Editors invite submissions on the ground-breaking reforms encapsulated in the State of Victoria’s Civil Procedure Act.
Posted in Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), Journals, Uncategorized | Tagged Appropriate Dispute Resolution, articles, call for submissions, case notes, Comments, Comparative articles examining the Victorian experience, Cost orders and sanctions, Disclosure and Discovery, expert evidence, Genevieve Grant, Historical analyses and reform, JCivLP, letters, Professor Michael Legg, reviews, Roderick (Rod) Joyce QSO QC, Special Issue, summary judgment, Victorian Civil Procedure Act 2010, Victorian Law Reform Commission's Civil Justice Review Report |
The latest Part of the Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice includes the following articles: “Artificial Intelligence and Litigation – Future Possibilities” – Don Farrands; and “The Impact of Self-represented Litigants on the Administration of Justice in the Federal Court of Australia” – Emma Garrett. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial Comments on “COVID-19 and Online Courts” – Michael Legg and “The Seven Tenets of Civil Justice” – Roderick Joyce QSO QC; Case Notes: “Morality in Price Fixing: Lodge Real Estate Ltd v Commerce Commission” – Stephen Rankin; and New Zealand Watch: “Courts and COVID-19: Delivering the Rule of Law in a Time of Crisis” – David Harvey.
Posted in Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged articles, artificial intelligence (AI), Artificial Intelligence and Litigation – Future Possibilities, Case Note, cost-effective dispute resolution, Courts and COVID-19: Delivering the Rule of Law in a Time of Crisis, COVID-19 and Online Courts, David Harvey, discovery analysis, Don Farrands, Editorial, Emma Garrett, human intelligence, JCivLP, legal research analytics, Louise Beange, Morality in Price Fixing: Lodge Real Estate Ltd v Commerce Commission, New Zealand Watch, predictive outcome analysis, Professor Michael Legg, reducing cost of litigation, resolving small claims and private treaty disputes, Roderick Joyce QSO QC, Stephen Rankin, The Impact of Self-represented Litigants on the Administration of Justice in the Federal Court of Australia, The Seven Tenets of Civil Justice, Tribunal decision-making |
The latest Part of the Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice includes the following articles: “Litigation Funding of Class Actions Approved in Queensland while Maintenance and Champerty Remain the Law” – Wayne Attrill; and “Documents Within Reach: Discovery “Powers”” – Alexander Sloan. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial Comments on “Lawyers to Be Able to Take Percentage of Class Action Damages in Victoria but Questions Remain” – Michael Legg and “”People Who Live in Glass Houses”: Fearn v Tate Gallery Board of Trustees” – Roderick Joyce, QSO, QC; and Case Notes: “The End of the Chorley Exception in Australia: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow” – Benjamin Teng and “Craig v Williams: Allegations of Apparent Bias” – Matthew Mortimer.
Posted in Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged “People Who Live in Glass Houses”: Fearn v Tate Gallery Board of Trustees, Alexander Sloan, Article, Benjamin Teng, Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd, case notes, Craig v Williams: Allegations of Apparent Bias, Documents Within Reach: Discovery "Powers", Editorial, JCivLP, Lawyers to Be Able to Take Percentage of Class Action Damages in Victoria but Questions Remain, Litigation Funding of Class Actions Approved in Queensland while Maintenance and Champerty Remain the Law, Louise Beange, Matthew Mortimer, Murphy Operator v Gladstone Ports Corp (No 4), Professor Michael Legg, Roderick Joyce QSO QC, The End of the Chorley Exception in Australia: Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow, Wayne Attrill |
The latest Part of the Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice includes the following articles: “Evaluating Damages in Shareholder Class Actions for Misleading Conduct and Breach of Disclosure Duties” – Lynsey Edgar; and “The Future of Law” – Sir Geoffrey Vos. Also in this Part is the editorial and the following sections: Commentary: “The Woolf and Jackson Reforms” – Roger Quick; Case Notes: “Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) [2018] 2 WLR 1353; [2018] UKSC 20: Negotiating (Or ‘Wrotham Park’) Damages for Breach of Contract” – William Fotherby; “Durie v Gardiner: New Zealand’s New Public Interest Defence to Defamation Claims” – Thomas McKenzie.
Posted in Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged case notes, Commentary, damages for breach of contract, damages in shareholder class actions, Durie v Gardiner, Editorial, JCivLP, Louise Beange, Lynsey Edgar, misleading conduct and breach of disclosure duties, orris-Garner v One Step (Support) [2018] 2 WLR 1353; [2018] UKSC 20, Professor Michael Legg, public interest defence to defamation claims, Roderick Joyce QSO QC, Roger Quick, Sir Geoffrey Vos, the future of law, Thomas McKenzie, William Fotherby, Woolf and Jackson reforms |
Thomson Reuters is extremely pleased to announce that Professor Michael Legg has joined the Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice as its new Co-General Editor, working alongside the current General Editor Roderick Joyce QSO QC. A Professor of Law at UNSW Sydney, Michael is the Director of the IMF Bentham Class Actions Research Initiative at UNSW Law, and Director of the Law Society of NSW Future of Law and Innovation in the Profession (FLIP) research stream in the Allens Hub for Technology, Law and Innovation at UNSW Law, having played a key role as the academic committee member on the ground-breaking FLIP Report launched by the Law Society of New South Wales in March 2017. The Journals Team warmly welcomes Professor Legg to the Journal looks forward to his insights and ideas in helping readers to navigate the current and future landscape of civil litigation and procedure in Australia and beyond.
Posted in Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), News & Insight, Uncategorized | Tagged Allens Hub for Technology Law and Innovation, FLIP Report, JCivLP, Journal of Civil Litigation and Practice (JCivLP), Law Society of NSW Future of Law and Innovation in the Profession (FLIP), Professor Michael Legg, Roderick Joyce QSO QC, The Future of Australian Legal Education Conference, UNSW Sydney |
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.
JOURNAL OF CIVIL LITIGATION AND PRACTICE
CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS for Special Issue on the 10th Anniversary of the Victorian Civil Procedure Act 2010
The Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic) was enacted 10 years ago and commenced operation on 1 January 2011. It was an Act aimed at reforming and modernising the laws, practice, procedure and culture for the resolution of civil disputes in Victoria. The Editors invite submissions on the ground-breaking reforms encapsulated in the State of Victoria’s Civil Procedure Act.