Richard Ingleby

Australian Law Journal update: Vol 91 Pt 6

By Journal Alerts on June 11, 2017

The latest Part of the Australian Law Journal contains the following articles: “Creation of the Federal Court: A Reflection” – Hon Sir Gerard Brennan AC KBE GBS; “Characterisation: Its place in Contractual Analysis and Related Enquiries” – James Allsop; “Gender Equality among Barristers before the High Court” – Daniel Reynolds and George Williams. This Part also includes the following sections: Current Issues; Around the Nation: Victoria; Environmental Law; Equity and Trusts; Family Law; Recent Cases; Books Received and Book Reviews.

Posted in Australian Law Journal, The (ALJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 40th anniversary of the Federal Court of Australia, ALJ, Angelina Gomez, appeals, Around the Nation: Victoria, barristers, Book reviews, books received, characterisation, common form grant, consumer law, contractual analysis, Conveyancing and Property Section Editors, Current issues, Daniel Reynolds, data retention laws, doctrine of penalties, enforcement of judgment debt, environmental law, equity and trusts, family law, FLIP Report, foreign judgments, gender equality, gender equality at Australian Bar, George Williams, Hon Sir Gerard Brennan AC KBE GBS, injunctions restraining executive orders, James Allsop, Justice Clyde Croft, Justice François Kunc, Justice Mark Leeming, Justice Rachel Pepper, Melbourne University Law School, Michael Quinlan, misfeasance in public office, Muslim ban executive orders, Philip R Wood, procedure, Professor Brendan Edgeworth, Recent cases, Richard Ingleby, Robert Angyal SC, Ruth C A Higgins, s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RDA), services, The Fall of the Priests and the Rise of the Lawyers, time for assessing testamentary capacity, unconscionability | Leave a response

Australian Law Journal update: Vol 91 Pt 2

By Journal Alerts on March 16, 2017

The latest Part of the Australian Law Journal includes the following articles: “Values in public law” – Chief Justice James Allsop AO (based on address given at the James Spigelman Oration 2015, Sydney); and “Not worth the paper they’re not written on? Executing documents (including deeds) under electronic documentation platforms: Part A” – Diccon Loxton. Also in this Part are the following sections: Current Issues; Conveyancing and Property; Family Law; Around the Nation: Northern Territory; Crime and Evidence; Personalia; Around the Nation: Western Australia; Recent Cases; Book Review; and Obituary.

Posted in Australian Law Journal, The (ALJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 40th anniversary of Federal Court, Airbnb, ALJ, ALJ sections, Around the Nation: Northern Territory, Around the Nation: Western Australia, book review, burqas, Chief Justice James Allsop AO, Chief Justice Susan Kiefel AC, Clare Langford, Conveyancing and property, Crime and Evidence, Current issues, Diccon Loxton, electronic contracts, electronic documentation platforms, electronic signatures, extended common purpose, extended joint criminal enterprise, family law, George Masterman QC, Industrial Relations Reform: Looking to the Future – Essays in Honour of Joe Isaac AO, James Spigelman Oration 2015, Justice François Kunc, Justice James Edelman, Justice Joseph McGrath, Justice Kenneth Martin, Justice Phillip Priest, Keith Hancock, Michael J Walton, Miller v The Queen (2016) 90 ALJR 918; [2016] HCA 30, niqabs, Obituary, Personalia, Peter Butt, public law, Recent cases, Richard Ingleby, Russell D Lansbury, Ruth C A Higgins, The Hon Dean Mildren AM RFD QC | Leave a response

Family Law Review update: December 2015

By Journal Alerts on December 11, 2015

The latest Part of the Family Law Review includes the following material: “Comment on the 2015 report of the Parliamentary Inquiry into the Child Support Program” – Maria Vnuk, Bruce Smyth and Tempe Archer; “Reconceptualising the treatment of “notional” assets in property settlement proceedings” – Richard Ingleby; Professional Insights: “The Notice of Risk: Why it is important and how to complete it” – Joe Harman; Children and Parenting: “Who is a parent and why does it matter?” – Felicity Bell; Child Support: “Informality in child support litigation” – Simon Bacon; Family Dispute Resolution: “Facilitative mediation in the family law arena: A good idea or an unreachable goal?” – Tamsyn Hinksman and Anne-Marie Rice; and Recent Cases: Donald v Forsyth; Elgin v Elgin; Jackson v Macek; and Janssen v Janssen.

Posted in Family Law Review (Fam L Rev), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 2015 Report of the Parliamentary Inquiry into the Child Support Program, Anne-Marie Rice, Babett v Falconer [2015] FamCAFC 124, Bruce Smyth, Burton v Churchin [2013] FLC 93-561; [2013] FamCAFC 180, child abuse, child support, Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth), Children and Parenting, Dean Foley, definition of non-parent, definition of parent, Donald v Forsyth, Elgin v Elgin, facilitative mediation, Fam L Rev, Family Dispute Resolution, family violence, Federal Circuit Court of Australia, Felicity Bell, Hon Kevin Andrews MP, Jackson v Macek, Janssen v Janssen, Joe Harman, Judge Geoffrey Monahan, Maria Vnuk, marriage as partnership, Michelle Fernando, Minister for Social Services, Notice of Risk, notional assets, Olivia Rundle, parenting orders, Professional Insights, property adjustment, property settlement, Recent cases, Richard Ingleby, s 60CC of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), Simon Bacon, Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108; [2012] HCA 52, Tamsyn Hinksman, Tempe Archer | Leave a response

Family Law Review update: December 2014

By journals team on December 17, 2014

The latest Part of the Family Law Review includes the following articles: “Inconsistencies in and the inadequacies of the family counselling and FDR confidentiality and admissibility provisions: The need for reform” – Donna Cooper; and “Let me be me: Parental responsibility, Gillick competence, and transgender minors’ access to hormone treatments” – Katherine France; the following Professional Insights note: “When can a party to contested proceedings have leave to adduce evidence from an adversarial expert when a single expert has already been appointed?” – Richard Ingleby and Anne-Marie Rice; and notes on the following cases: Vadisanis v Vadisanis; Zanda v Zanda; and Cape v Cape.

Posted in Family Law Review (Fam L Rev), Update Summaries | Tagged admissibility, adversarial expert, Anne-Marie Rice, Cape v Cape, confidentiality, contested proceedings, Dean Foley, Donna Cooper, Fam L Rev, family counselling, FDR, Gillick competence, hormone treatments, Judge Geoffrey Monahan, Katherine France, Michelle Fernando, Olivia Rundle, parental responsibility, Professional Insights, Recent cases, Richard Ingleby, transgender minors, Vadisanis v Vadisanis, Zanda v Zanda | Leave a response

Family Law Review update: October 2014

By journals team on November 5, 2014

The latest Part of the Family Law Review includes the following material: “Can Part VII of the Family Law Act do what is asked of it?” – Helen Rhoades, John Dewar and Nareeda Lewers; “A national approach to manage vexatious litigation: New powers under the Family Law Act” – Robert Benjamin; and “Do members of a class of beneficiaries of a discretionary trust have a “right” to documents which can be enforced in the Family Court?” – Richard Ingleby. There is also an International Family Law section and a Recent Cases section with notes on the following cases: SCVG v KLD (Shared parental responsibility – Equal or substantial and significant time); Gludau v Gludau; Gludau v Gludau (No 2) (Property – Wrong assessment of contributions – Restitution); Langer v Griffin (Property – Contravention order – Prison sentence).

Posted in Family Law Review (Fam L Rev), Update Summaries | Tagged children's care, Fam L Rev, Family Court, Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), Gludau v Gludau, Helen Rhoades, International Family Law, John Dewar, Judge Alexandra Harland, Judge Geoffrey Monahan, Langer v Griffin, Michelle Fernando, Nareeda Lewers, Olivia Rundle, Recent cases, Richard Ingleby, Robert Benjamin, SCVG v KLD, separating parents, vexatious litigation | Leave a response

Family Law Review update: June 2012

By journals team on June 6, 2012

The latest Part of the Family Law Review contains the usual interesting mix of articles and sections covering a wide range of topics including admissions made in the context of financial proceedings, eligibility criteria for assisted reproductive treatment, common intention constructive trusts in the context of the family home, de facto financial claims, child support, family dispute resolution, parenting disputes and much more!

Posted in Family Law Review (Fam L Rev), Update Summaries | Tagged Alexandra Harland, Child Support Update, common intention, constructive trusts, de facto, Debbie Hayer, Dr Sonia Allan, eligibility criteria, Family Dispute Resolution, Family Law Rules, FDR, Geoffrey Monahan FM, International Family Law, Linda Kochanski, Mark Pawlowski, Michael Nicholls QC, Michelle Fernando, Nicola Grout, Olivia Rundle, Professional Insights, Recent cases, reproductive treatment, Richard Ingleby | Leave a response

Legal - Australia Thomson Reuters

Richard Ingleby

Australian Law Journal update: Vol 91 Pt 6

Australian Law Journal update: Vol 91 Pt 2

Family Law Review update: December 2014

Family Law Review update: October 2014

Family Law Review update: June 2012

Keep Updated via Email

About Journals Talk

Resources

Our Communities