s 292(4B) of the Companies Act 1993 (NZ)

Insolvency Law Journal update: November 2015

By Journal Alerts on December 14, 2015

The latest Part of the Insolvency Law Journal includes the following articles: “Raiders of the secured asset: The doctrinal rationalisation for the liquidator’s lien or charge over a secured asset post-Stewart v Atco” – Nicholas A Tiverios; and “The conundrum of phoenix activity: Is further reform necessary?” – Anne Matthew; and the following section notes: Recent Developments: “Corporate sureties surely risky” – Paulina Fishman; “Floundering around the phoenix: Is it possible to use court proceedings effectively?” – David Morrison; and Report from New Zealand: “Determining the start date of the single transaction calculation under s 292(4B) of the Companies Act 1993 (NZ) and s 588FA of the Corporations Act (Cth)” – Lynne Taylor.

Posted in Insolvency Law Journal (Insolv LJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged Anne Matthew, corporate sureties, Dr David Morrison, Editorial, illegal phoenix activity, Insolv LJ, liquidator's remuneration, liquidator’s lien or charge, Lynne Taylor, Nicholas A Tiverios, Paulina Fishman, phoenix activity, recent developments, Report from New Zealand, s 292(4B) of the Companies Act 1993 (NZ), s 588FA of the Corporations Act (Cth), secured asset, single transaction calculation, Stewart v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (in liq) (2014) 252 CLR 307 | Leave a response

Company and Securities Law Journal update: November 2015

By Journal Alerts on December 8, 2015

The latest Part of the Company and Securities Law Journal includes the following content: “Can an Australian company use a dispute resolution clause in its constitution to bar shareholder class actions?” – James Emmerig; “Public interest litigation under s 50 of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth): The case for amendment” – Tony Johnson; “Banning, disqualification and licensing powers: ACCC, APRA, ASIC and the ATO – Regulatory overlap, penalty privilege and law reform” – Tom Middleton; and the following sections: Corporate Insolvency: “Recovery from Ponzi scheme investors: New Zealand’s Fisk v McIntosh [2015] NZHC 1403” – Trish Keeper; and Overseas Notes: New Zealand: “New Zealand rejects peak indebtedness” – Barry Allan.

Posted in Company and Securities Law Journal (C&SLJ), Update Summaries | Tagged “no class action” clause, “whole of government” approach to regulatory reform, access to justice, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Australian peak indebtedness rule, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Australian Taxation Office (ATO), banning, bar shareholder class actions, Barry Allan, C&SLJ, complement privately funded shareholder and investor claims and class actions, consistent case treatment and outcomes, constitutional bar, contractual restraint, Corporate insolvency, Delaware Court of Chancery, dispute resolution clause, disqualification, Editorial, Fisk v McIntosh [2015] NZHC 1403, Gordon R Walker, Helen Anderson, impact on Australian company, James Emmerig, licence cancellation, New Zealand, Overseas Notes: New Zealand, Ponzi scheme investors, procedural limitations on member shareholders, Professor Bob Baxt, Professor Paul Ali, Pt 5.7B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), public interest litigation, regulatory outcomes, regulatory overlap, s 292(4B) of the Companies Act 1993 (NZ), s 50 of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), suspension, Timberworld Ltd v Levin [2015] 3 NZLR 365; [2015] NZCA 111, Tom Middleton, Tony Johnson, Trish Keeper, uniform operation of penalty privilege, US Supreme Court | Leave a response

Legal - Australia Thomson Reuters

s 292(4B) of the Companies Act 1993 (NZ)

Insolvency Law Journal update: November 2015

Company and Securities Law Journal update: November 2015

Keep Updated via Email

About Journals Talk

Resources

Our Communities