The latest Part of the Public Law Review includes the following content: Comments: “As Safe as Houses?: Commonwealth Continuing Detention of High Risk Terrorist Offenders” – Greg Carne; “The ‘Always Speaking’ Principle: Not Always Needed?” – Jacinta Dharmananda; Speech: “Chapter IV: The Inter-State Commission and the Regulation of Trade and Commerce under the Australian Constitution” – Stephen Gageler; and the following Articles: “Inside and Outside Criminal Process: The Comparative Salience of the New Zealand and Victorian Human Rights Charters” – Claudia Geiringer; “Executive Power” – K M Hayne; “Mistakes about Mistake of Fact: The New Zealand Story” – Hanna Wilberg; and Developments.
Posted in Journals, Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged 'always speaking' principle, Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd [2005] 3 NZLR 721; [2005] NZSC 34, Chapter IV of the Constitution, Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), Claudia Geiringer, Comments, comparison of New Zealand and Victorian human rights charters, continuing detention of high risk terrorist offenders, criminal process, developments, division of powers, executive power, Greg Carne, Hanna Wilberg, Inter-State Commission, Inter-State Commission Act 1912 (Cth), Jacinta Dharmananda, K M Hayne, mistakes about mistake of fact, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZ), PLR, protection of Australian industry, regulation of trade and commerce, Ririnui v Landcorp Farming Ltd [2016] 1 NZLR 1056; [2016] NZSC 62, separation of powers, Speech, statutory bill of rights model, Statutory interpretation, Stephen Gageler, The Hon Kenneth Madison Hayne AC QC, Wheat Acquisition Act 1914 (NSW) |
The latest Part of the Public Law Review includes the following content: Comments: “Extraordinary Powers without Judicial Oversight: A Separation of Powers Dilemma” – Rebecca Ananian-Welsh; “Constitutional Recognition through a (Justiciable) Duty to Consult? Towards Entrenched and Judicially Enforceable Norms of Indigenous Consultation” – Megan Davis and Rosalind Dixon; “Revisiting the Scope of the Race Power after McCloy” – Harry Hobbs; and the following Articles: “Refining the Australian Counter-terrorism Legislative Framework: How Deliberative Has Parliament Been?” – Dominique Dalla-Pozza; “The Constitutional and Regulatory Dimensions of Plebiscites in Australia” – Paul Kildea; “The Entrenchment of Certiorari and Habeas Corpus: A Reconceptualisation of the Source and Content of Judicial Power” – Ying Hao Li and Kevin Ngo; and Book review: “Damages and Human Rights” – reviewed by Stephen Gageler.
Posted in Journals, Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Act 2015 (Cth), book review, certiorari, Comments, Commonwealth Parliament, constitutional and regulatory framework, constitutional recognition, counter-terrorism legislation, counter-terrorism powers, Damages and Human Rights, deliberative democratic standards, detention warrants, Dominique Dalla-Pozza, Foreign Fighters, habeas corpus, Harry Hobbs, Indigenous consultation, Jason NE Varuhas, judicial oversight, judicial power, judicial review, Kevin Ngo, McCloy v New South Wales (2015) 89 ALJR 857, Megan Davis, national security, Paul Kildea, plebiscites, PLR, public law litigation, questioning warrants, race power, Rebecca Ananian-Welsh, Rosalind Dixon, s 75(v) of the Constitution, same-sex marriage, section 51(xxvi) of the Constitution, separation of powers, Stephen Gageler, Ying Hao Li |
The June issue of the Public Law Review is full of a range of interesting material, including an article on the meaning given to the interpretation provisions of statutory bills of rights across several jurisdictions, both within Australia and internationally, the difficulties associated with the separation of judicial power and on the role of judges in couter-terrorism questioning and detention. There are also Comments and Developments sections, as well as a book review.
Posted in Public Law Review (PLR), Update Summaries | Tagged ASIO, book reivew, counter-terrorism, developments, James Stellios, Kable doctrine, Luke Beck, PLR, Rebecca Walsh, role of judges, separation of powers, statutory bills of rights, voting rights |
By Hon RS French. Judges today are asked to perform a variety of non-judicial, administrative functions, such as issuing search warrants or preventative detention orders. But are these the kinds of things that judges should do?
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.
Public Law Review update: Vol 28 Pt 3
The latest Part of the Public Law Review includes the following content: Comments: “As Safe as Houses?: Commonwealth Continuing Detention of High Risk Terrorist Offenders” – Greg Carne; “The ‘Always Speaking’ Principle: Not Always Needed?” – Jacinta Dharmananda; Speech: “Chapter IV: The Inter-State Commission and the Regulation of Trade and Commerce under the Australian Constitution” – Stephen Gageler; and the following Articles: “Inside and Outside Criminal Process: The Comparative Salience of the New Zealand and Victorian Human Rights Charters” – Claudia Geiringer; “Executive Power” – K M Hayne; “Mistakes about Mistake of Fact: The New Zealand Story” – Hanna Wilberg; and Developments.