strengths-based regulation

Insolvency Law Journal update: Vol 28 Pt 4
By Journal Alerts on
The latest Part of the Journal includes the following articles: “Judicial Guidelines for Insolvent Litigation Funding Agreements” – Sulette Lombard and Christopher F Symes; and “Regulation of Insolvency Practitioners in a Pandemic” – Catherine Robinson. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial – Dr David Morrison; Recent Developments: “Creditor-defeating Dispositions: A Necessary Addition to Australia’s Corporate Insolvency Laws” – Stephanie Bruce; and Report from New Zealand: “Enforcement of Directors’ Duties in a Liquidation Context: Madsen-Ries v Cooper” – Lynne Taylor.
Posted in Insolvency Law Journal (Insolv LJ), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged analysis of these judicial guidelines, anticipated increased number of insolvencies following the removal of interim government measures, articles, Catherine Robinson, Christopher F Symes, Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), COVID-19 pandemic, Creditor-defeating Dispositions: A Necessary Addition to Australia's Corporate Insolvency Laws, Dr David Morrison, Editorial, elements of good practice and innovative regulatory approaches, Enforcement of Directors' Duties in a Liquidation Context: Madsen-Ries v Cooper, gaps and inconsistencies in the reporting of enforcement statistics, improved collaboration, Insolv LJ, Judicial Guidelines for Insolvent Litigation Funding Agreements, new normal in insolvency practitioner regulation, post-reform review of the application of enforcement tools in the discipline of insolvency practitioners, potential abuse of litigation funding, Professor Lynne Taylor, recent developments, Regulation of Insolvency Practitioners in a Pandemic, regulatory agenda and recalibration in enforcement approaches to reduce regulatory burden, Report from New Zealand, Stephanie Bruce, strengths-based regulation, Sulette Lombard, system of judicial oversight, transparency in enforcement action | Leave a response