What if…

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 28 Pt 4

By Journal Alerts on December 29, 2020

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Batter Up: ACCC Proposes Compulsory “Final Offer Arbitration” for Disputes between Media Businesses and Digital Platforms in Australia” – Sam Luttrell and Dave Poddar; and “Asset Valuation Confusion under Australia’s National Gas Rules” – Euan Morton and Matt Rodgers. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Access to Services; Defective Goods; Restrictive Trade Practices; Case Note; Council Considerations; Commission Cameos; What If …; Comments from Commerce; Report from China; and Report from India.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 45-day compulsory Final Offer Arbitration process, Access to Services, AJCCL, articles, Asset Valuation Confusion under Australia's National Gas Rules, asset valuation methodology, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Australian gas transmission pipelines, Batter Up: ACCC Proposes Compulsory Final Offer Arbitration for Disputes between Media Businesses and Digital Platforms in Australia, Bobby Jain, Case Note, Christopher Hodgekiss SC, Christopher Kok, Comments from Commerce, Commission Cameos, Competition in the Time of COVID-19, Council considerations, Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal Service – Implications for the Scope of Access Regulation, Dave Poddar, Defective Goods, Editorial, Euan Morton, Facebook, fair payment for news content, Google, Gym Equipment Higher Education Expectations and Framed Bathing Pools, Hank Spier, Information Disclosure and Arbitration Framework provisions under Pt 23 of the Australian National Gas Rules, John Hedge, Julie Clarke, Mandatory Bargaining Code, Matt Rodgers, Maureen Ip Hee Wai, Michael Gvozdenovic, Peter Strong, Pravin Anand, recovered capital method (RCM), Report from China, Report from India, Resale Price Maintenance: A Stocktake, Restrictive trade practices, Russell Miller AM, Sam Luttrell, SAMR's Approach to Failing Firms, Sharon Henrick, Stephen Puttick, T H J Cadd, The Council's Work during 2019–2020, The Rise and Fall of a Legal Principle, Travel Issues During the Pandemic, Undertakings in Merger Proceedings Following Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pacific National Pty Ltd: Has the Train Left the Station?, Updates from Competition Law Regime for the Year 2019–2020, What If Australia Took More Notice of EU Competition Law?, What if... | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 27 Pt 1

By Journal Alerts on March 18, 2019

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Deceptive Domain Names – Misconduct through Misnomers” – Adrian Coorey; “Merger Authorisation Processes in Australia in Light of the Tabcorp Decision (It’s Hip to Be Square – Hipster Economics and Antitrust)” – Dave Poddar; “Commercial Reality: Its Place in the Authorisation of Mergers” – Ketki Kotwal; and the following sections: Authorisations and Notifications; Telecommunications; Landmarks; Energy Etchings; Case Notes; Consumer Concerns; What If…; Report from Russia; and Report from India.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 2018 work of the Australian Energy Regulator (AER), ACCC’s Digital Platforms Inquiry, Adrian Coorey, AJCCL, annual update, Another New Feature, appellate review and misleading conduct, authorisation of mergers, Authorisations and notifications, case notes, Christopher Hodgekiss SC, Consumer concerns, cybersquatting of domain names, deceptive domain names, Defiance Holdings Ltd, Editorial, Ekaterina Zotova, Energy etchings, Evgeny Khokhlov, Gareth Downing, Gippsland Dairy Farmers Group Collective Bargaining Authorisation, Holly Raiche, information asymmetries in telecommunications, Ketki Kotwal, Landmarks, Matthew Paterson, merger authorisation process in the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA), Michael Daniel, misuse of market power in Australia, Natasha Dixon, Niloufer Selvadurai, Nivedha Krishnan, Paula Conboy, Pravin Anand, Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL v ACCC [2018] FCAFC 30, public benefits under competition legislation, Re Queensland Co-Operative Milling Association Ltd, recent cases concerning retailers' price co-ordination, Report from India, Report from Russia, Rosannah Healy, Russell Miller AM, Tabcorp Matter, Telecommunications, types of cybercrime, Vaibhav Gagga, Vaishali Mittal, What if... | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 25 Pt 2

By Journal Alerts on June 15, 2017

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Proving Misleading or Deceptive Conduct: Challenges Posed by the Internet” – Adrian Coorey; “Influencers, Instagurus, and Enablers: Using Accessorial Liability to Establish a Norm of Behaviour in Relation to Disguised Viral Marketing” – Lynden Griggs and Aviva Freilich; “Extracting Value from Big Data: Taking Big Data Processing and Analysis into Account” – Suiyi Zhang; Access to Services; Case Note: Tribunal Tableaux; Consumer Concerns; What If…; Comments from Commerce; Report from Russia; Report from New Zealand; and Benchmarks.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "Because of the conduct", "Knowingly concerned", "Particular purpose … that the consumer makes known", "Request", "Undue", abusing dominant position, ACCC v Reckitt Benckiser (Aust) Pty Ltd [2016] ATPR 42-530; [2016] FCAFC 181, Access to Services, accessorial liability, Adrian Coorey, AJCCL, Australian Competition Tribunal, Aviva Freilich, Benchmarks, big data, business community, Case Note, civil penalties, Comments from Commerce, Commerce Act 1986 (NZ), Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Consumer concerns, disguised viral marketing, DP World Sydney Ltd v Guy (2016) 262 IR 156; [2016] NSWSC 1072, Editorial, enablers, Evgeny Khokhlov, Fair Trading Act 1986 (NZ), Google, influencers, information collection online, informed consent online, instagurus, internet, Jeremy Riddle, John Hedge, Lindsay Trotman, Lynden Griggs, Matthew Barry, Matthew Berkahn, merchantable quality, misleading or deceptive conduct, online advertising, online commercial transactions, Peter Strong, price monitoring, privacy information, processing and analysis, Report from New Zealand, Report from Russia, restraint of trade clauses, Ron Desiatnik, Russell Miller AM, Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service, s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law, Suiyi Zhang, Tim Luxton, Tribunal Tableaux, trigger for Australian competition liability, What if... | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: September 2016

By Journal Alerts on September 8, 2016

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Australia’s Protected Cartel Information Scheme: Has the Right Balance Been Struck?” – Holly Yang Cao; and “The ACCC, the Internet and Extraterritorial Injunctions” – Adrian Coorey; and the following sections: Access to Services; Administration and National Competition Policy; Case Note; What If…; Consumer Concerns; Report from Asia; Report from North America; and Worth Repeating.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC v Yazaki Corp (No 2) [2015] FCA 1304, Access Regulation, Access to Services, Administration and National Competition Policy, ADR processes, Adrian Coorey, AJCCL, Antitrust Enforcement, ASEAN, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Business-to-Business Disputes, Caroline Michel, Case Note, Christopher Pleatsikas, Consumer concerns, Extraterritorial Injunctions, Frank Zumbo, Holly Yang Cao, Indirect Causation, internet, Jessica Rusten, John Hedge, Ketki Kowal, lemon cars, misuse of market power, Monopoly Pricing, Protected Cartel Information Scheme, Rachel Burgess, Report from Asia, Report from North America, Russell Miller AM, Sarah Agar, Shila Dorai Raj, Small and medium enterprises (SMEs), United States, What if..., Worth repeating | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: June 2015

By journals team on June 9, 2015

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “A fly in the ointment for the ACCC? Implications of the Cement Australia decision for the interpretation of section 46” – Caroline Coops; and “Acceptable quality v merchantable quality” – Lynsey Edgar. Also in this Part are the following sections: Enforcement and Remedies; Case Note; What if…; Comments from Commerce; Consumer Concerns; Snapshots; Economic(s) Matters; Report from New Zealand; Report from Asia; and Report from Russia.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged "essential facilities", ACCC, acceptable quality, AJCCL, Alex Sundakov, Amanda Seethor, ASEAN member countries, Australian Consumer Law, Caroline Coops, Case Note, Cement Australia decision, Comments from Commerce, Competition Policy Review, Consumer concerns, Diana Biscoe, Douglas Shirrefs, Economic(s) Matters, energy usage charges, Enforcement and Remedies, Harper Review, Jemimah Roberts, Jenny Mee, Julia Borisova, Kerry Lee, Lindsay Trotman, Lynsey Edgar, Matthew Berkahn, Matthew Knox, merchantable quality, Murray Deakin, net neutrality, privatising regulated infrastructure, Report from Asia, Report from New Zealand, Report from Russia, Russell Miller AM, s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Simon Pryor, Snapshots, Tom Clarke, What if..., Xavier O’Halloran | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: September 2014

By journals team on September 12, 2014

The latest Part of AJCCL includes the following articles: “Australian Competition and Consumer Commission priorities” – Rod Sims; “Does it matter what the hypothetical consumer knows? An analysis of ACCC v TPG” – Haylene Treisman; and “A snuggle for survival – the paradox of section 44ZZRD(3)(c): Restricting co-operation may mean restricting competition” – Marianna Parry and Richard Hobson. Also in this part are the following sections: Authorisations and Notifications; Consumer Protections; Case note; What if…; Consumer Concerns; Report from Africa, Report from Europe; and Report from Latin America.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC, ACCC v TPG, AJCCL, Authorisations and notifications, Bernard McCabe, Case Note, Coles, competition law, construction industry, Consumer concerns, Consumer Protections, Haylene Treisman, Laurène Baudouin, Lesley Morphet, Luis Omar Guerrero Rodriguez, Marianna Parry, misleading or deceoptive conduct, mobile network coverage, Report from Africa, Report from Europe, Report from Latin America, resale price maintenance, restricting co-operation, Richard Hobson, Rod Sims, Russell Miller, s 44ZZRD(3)(c) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sarah Andrews, shopper docket, South Africa, supermarkets, Una Lawrence, What if..., Woolworths, Yves Brulard | Leave a response

Legal - Australia Thomson Reuters

What if…

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 28 Pt 4

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 27 Pt 1

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: September 2016

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: June 2015

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: September 2014

Keep Updated via Email

About Journals Talk

Resources

Our Communities