*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com<\/a> or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AST).<\/p>\n The latest issue of the Building and Construction Law Journal<\/em> (Volume 33 Part 6) contains the following material:<\/p>\n EDITORIAL<\/a><\/p>\n Managing Legal Risk in Government Procurement: Disgruntled Tenderers\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 Search for a Remedy Continues <\/strong><\/em><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Louise Young<\/p>\n Given the clear judicial guidance that now exists on process contracts, this author advances the argument that process contracts are a powerful risk management tool for procuring entities and should be embraced rather than avoided (as has historically been the case). However, from a tenderer\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s point of view, challenges remain in identifying meaningful claims or remedies where procuring entities mismanage procurement process. The author considers to what extent the soon to be enacted Government Procurement (Judicial Review) Bill 2017 <\/em>(Cth) or a claim in estoppel re-balance the competing tensions between a procuring entity\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s desire for flexibility and a tenderer\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s lust for certainty.<\/p>\n REPORT<\/a><\/p>\n For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: BCL Vol 33 No 6 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n
Article<\/h3>\n
\n