*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com\u00c2\u00a0or\u00c2\u00a0contact us on 1300 304 195\u00c2\u00a0(Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980\u00c2\u00a0(international customers) during business hours\u00c2\u00a0(Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AEST).<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the Australian Law Journal (Volume 96 Part 1) contains the following material:<\/p>\n
CURRENT ISSUES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Justice Fran\u00c3\u00a7ois Kunc <\/strong><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n CRIME AND EVIDENCE<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Justice Phillip Priest <\/strong><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n FAMILY LAW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Richard Ingleby <\/strong><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n TECHNOLOGY AND THE LAW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Lyria Bennett Moses <\/strong><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n PERSONALIA<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Emily Vale <\/strong><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n An Adverse View of Adverse Possession<\/em><\/strong><\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/strong>Anthony Gray<\/p>\n The doctrine of adverse possession, under which a trespasser to property belonging to another might ultimately become the legal owner of it, continues to be applied in Australian and United Kingdom courts. Though it may have made sense centuries ago, it has become increasingly difficult to justify the doctrine. It has been stridently criticised by the judiciary and academy. It appears at odds with the law\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s general reluctance to permit individuals to profit from wrongdoing, and the Torrens system of title by registration. This article critiques the doctrine, suggesting significant reform is necessary.<\/p>\n Click here to access this article on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n Reflecting on the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)<\/strong><\/em><\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/strong>Amanda Scardamaglia<\/p>\n 2021 marked 25 years since the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) <\/em>(TMA) came into effect. This article will reflect on the key changes brought about by the TMA. The article will focus on the application of these provisions by IP Australia and the Office at the examination stage, but also the case law emanating from these new provisions. How have these new provisions been applied and interpreted? What issues have been settled by the courts? What are the gaps, ambiguities and inconsistencies arising, requiring further reform or interrogation? In doing so this article ultimately concludes that many of the changes made to the TMA have had consequences that lawmakers did not, and could not have intended.<\/p>\n Click here to access this article on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n BOOK REVIEW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Angelina Gomez <\/strong><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n OBITUARIES<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: Westlaw AU \u00e2\u20ac\u201c ALJ Vol 96 No 1 Contents<\/a> or here: New Westlaw Australia \u00e2\u20ac\u201c ALJ Vol 96 No 1 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n Click here to access this Part on Westlaw AU<\/a><\/p>\n Click here to access this Part on New Westlaw AU<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Articles<\/h3>\n
\n
\n