*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AST).<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the Building and Construction Law Journal<\/em> (Volume 37 Part 4) contains the following material:<\/p>\n EDITORIAL<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Michael Christie SC<\/em><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n CASE NOTE<\/a><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n Cardinal Change and the Decision in Wegan Constructions Pty Ltd v Wodonga<\/em><\/a> Sewerage Authority <\/em><\/a><\/strong>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Dr Richard Manly QC<\/p>\n A close examination of the facts in the unreported decision of Lush J in the Supreme Court of Victoria in 1976 which is the subject matter of this article supports the conclusion that the cardinal change doctrine has application to construction contracts in Australia. A determination to this effect will very much depend on the proper construction of the relevant variation or change order provisions in a contract and will require a granular analysis of the facts. This article considers these matters having regard to his Honour\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s reasons for decision.<\/p>\n Click here to access article on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n REPORTS<\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n Click here to access on New Westlaw<\/a><\/p>\n For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: Westlaw AU – BCL Vol 37 No 4 Contents<\/a> or New Westlaw Australia – BCL Vol 37 No 4 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n
\n
Article<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n