{"id":16042,"date":"2023-04-21T02:02:50","date_gmt":"2023-04-21T02:02:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/?p=16042"},"modified":"2023-04-21T02:02:50","modified_gmt":"2023-04-21T02:02:50","slug":"company-and-securities-law-journal-update-vol-39-pt-7","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/2023\/04\/21\/company-and-securities-law-journal-update-vol-39-pt-7\/","title":{"rendered":"Company and Securities Law Journal update: Vol 39 Pt 7"},"content":{"rendered":"

*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU. If you are using Checkpoint, the links can be found in the Checkpoint PDF <\/strong>at the bottom of this post.<\/p>\n

To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com<\/a> or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AEST).<\/p>\n

The latest issue of the Company and Securities Law Journal <\/em>(Volume 39 Part 7) contains the following material:<\/p>\n

EDITORIAL<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Edmund Finnane<\/em><\/p>\n

Articles<\/h3>\n

Section 52(12) <\/strong>\u2013 The Forgotten Covenant <\/strong><\/em><\/a>\u2013 M Scott Donald<\/p>\n

The past few years has seen resurgent interest in the obligation, variously manifested, imposed on the trustees of Australian superannuation funds to exercise their powers and perform their duties in the best interests of their members. Curiously, however, almost no attention has been given to the obligation arising from the covenant in s 52(12) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 <\/em>(Cth) (SIS Act), a covenant whose open textured drafting, on its face, would appear to extend the horizon of the family of \u201cbest interests\u201d duties in a number of non-trivial directions. This article starts to address that lack of attention. It finds that although uncertainties remain, the text of the covenant, and its presence in Pt 6 of the SIS Act, potentially extends the scope of the so-called \u201cbest interests\u201d duty as currently understood by most in the industry in ways that are consequential and ought not be underestimated.<\/p>\n

IOSCO\u2019s Initiatives on Hedge Fund Regulation: An Interpretative Perspective <\/strong><\/em><\/a>\u2013 Xun Li<\/p>\n

As a transnational regulatory network (TRN), the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has championed a wide range of initiatives on hedge funds. They compose the only global framework in this area that national regulators can draw from but have not been specifically studied by academics. By doctrinally explaining and assessing this by reference to the strengths and weaknesses of TRNs, this article attempts to close the research gap from the perspective of TRN theory. Based on an elaboration of IOSCO\u2019s legal nature, it finds that the IOSCO framework is crucial in this area as it exemplifies four essential characteristics in helping regulators to address the systemic risk associated with hedge funds.<\/p>\n

TAKEOVERS AND PUBLIC SECURITIES<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Jonathan Farrer<\/em><\/p>\n