*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AEST).<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the Australian Law Journal (Volume 98 Part 4) contains the following material:<\/p>\n
CURRENT ISSUES<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Justice Fran\u00e7ois Kunc<\/strong><\/p>\n FAMILY LAW<\/a> \u2013 Editor: The Hon Justice Grant Riethmuller AM<\/strong><\/p>\n HUMAN RIGHTS<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Emeritus Professor Simon Rice OAM<\/strong><\/p>\n FROM THE LAW SCHOOLS<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Emeritus Professor David Barker AM<\/strong><\/p>\n Imperial Enactments in Australia Reconsidered: What Are They and Are They Worth Keeping?<\/em><\/a> \u2013 <\/strong>Oscar H Kawamata<\/p>\n Imperial enactments in Australia are in a state of limbo. Often overlooked, even the jurisdictions which have attempted to systematically organise them have not revisited them since the passage of the Australia Acts in 1986<\/em>. For nearly four decades, the Australian legislatures have had the unencumbered power to repeal or amend inherited Imperial laws, but have not done so on any significant scale. This article lays the groundwork for meaningful reform in this area by: (1) seeking to identify the Imperial enactments which remain in force in Australia; and (2) making provisional conclusions as to whether they should be retained. It ultimately argues that the vast majority of Imperial enactments can and should be repealed or re-enacted.<\/p>\n From Shakespeare to AI: The Law and Evolving Technologies<\/em><\/a> \u2013 <\/strong>Melissa Perry, Benjamin Durkin and Charlotte Breznik<\/p>\n This article considers some of the key challenges posed by Artificial intelligence (AI) to fundamental legal values which hitherto have drawn upon inherently human qualities such as mercy, compassion, equality, and fairness. While there have been significant developments internationally, there is presently no international consensus as to the best means for regulating AI, and governments globally, including in Australia, are still in the process of developing appropriate and effective regulatory systems. The article first briefly explains the evolution of automated processes and AI in order to explain some of the potential impacts and risks associated, in particular, with new generative AI technologies by reference to practical, contemporary examples. The article then considers the use of machine technologies in administrative decision-making in Australia. It concludes with a discussion of some of the fundamental values and concepts relevant to developing appropriate legal responses to the use of AI in administrative decision-making.<\/p>\n \u201cHeard\u201d But Unrepresented: Making the Case for the Independent Legal Representation of Children in Adoption from Care Proceedings in New South Wales<\/em><\/a> \u2013 <\/strong>Gabrielle Stricker-Phelps and Professor Judy Cashmore<\/p>\n In New South Wales, as in other Australian jurisdictions, children are routinely legally represented in care and protection, criminal, and contested family law matters. This is not the case, however, in adoption matters although the Adoption Act 2000 <\/em>(NSW) enables the Court to appoint a children\u2019s lawyer where it appears that a child \u201cneeds to be represented\u201d. This article outlines the substantive and procedural benefits of children\u2019s legal representation particularly in adoption-from-care proceedings though of course, the extent to which the benefits of children\u2019s legal representation are fully realised is dependent on the effectiveness of children\u2019s lawyers and the quality of legal services they deliver. Various factors that the Court may consider when exercising its discretion to appoint a legal representative for a child in NSW adoption-from-care proceedings are outlined.<\/p>\n BOOK REVIEW<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Angelina Gomez<\/strong><\/p>\n For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: New Westlaw Australia – ALJ Vol 98 No 4 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n Click here to access this Part on New Westlaw AU<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
Articles<\/h3>\n
\n