*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AST).<\/p>\n
This issue of the Australian Intellectual Property Journal<\/em> (Volume 35 Part 1) contains the following material:<\/p>\n EDITORIAL<\/a> \u2013 General Editor: David Lindsay <\/em><\/p>\n Sketching Moral Rights<\/strong><\/em><\/a> \u2013 Isabella Alexander, Pat Grant, Genevieve Wilkinson and Evana Wright<\/p>\n This article examines the relevance of the protection for moral rights to commercial visual artists. Our small scoping study suggests that visual artists are concerned about protection of rights to integrity and attribution but they lack understanding of their legal entitlements. Although moral rights were introduced into Australian copyright law over 20 years ago, the number of court cases invoking them remains low, providing limited guidance on their nature and scope. There may be multiple explanations for this lack of enforcement, including that litigation may be too costly or risky to pursue or that there is insufficient understanding of the nature of moral rights and how they may be enforced. We argue that broader education about moral rights is likely to benefit commercial visual artists, particularly given the emerging risks posed by the digital environment for effective protection of moral rights.<\/p>\n For Better or Metaverse: Assessing Potential Risks and Opportunities For Brand Protection within the Metaverse<\/strong><\/em><\/a> \u2013 Marie Karykis<\/p>\n The metaverse presents both opportunity and risk for intellectual property commercialisation, particularly in the context of brand protection and enforcement in trade mark and copyright law. Australian courts have not yet grappled with the application of existing ownership and licensing regimes of \u201creal world\u201d goods and services to their \u201cvirtual\u201d counterparts. However, guidance from Intellectual Property Australia and recent international jurisprudence indicates there is sufficient means to both commercialise, and protect against unauthorised use of, intellectual property in the metaverse. While Australian copyright and trade mark laws will continue to provide sufficient means for commercialisation, as well as established pathways for brand protection and enforcement, there are unique practical issues that businesses should be prepared to navigate as this technology develops. The article considers how businesses can effectively protect and enforce their brands within new metaverse platforms.<\/p>\n BOOK REVIEW<\/p>\n For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: New Westlaw Australia – AIPJ Vol 35 No 1 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n Click here to access this Part on New Westlaw AU<\/a><\/p>\nArticles<\/h3>\n
\n