*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AEST).<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the Australian Law Journal (Volume 99 Part 2) contains the following material:<\/p>\n
CURRENT ISSUES<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Justice Fran\u00e7ois Kunc<\/em><\/p>\n CONVEYANCING AND PROPERTY \u2013 Editors: Robert Angyal SC and Brendan Edgeworth<\/em><\/p>\n ENVIRONMENTAL LAW<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Justice Rachel Pepper<\/em><\/p>\n AROUND THE NATION: NORTHERN TERRITORY \u2013 Editor: Hon Dean Mildren AM RFD KC<\/em><\/p>\n AROUND THE NATION: WESTERN AUSTRALIA \u2013 Editor: The Hon Kenneth Martin KC<\/em><\/p>\n Resolving Statutory Overlap in the Superannuation System<\/strong><\/em><\/a> \u2013 M Scott Donald and Aryan Mohseni<\/p>\n Australia\u2019s national superannuation system enlivens a complex collage of Commonwealthand State laws and regulatory regimes. It therefore provides an opportunity to explorethe operation of legislative devices designed to resolve issues of overlap in a practicalsetting of considerable consequence. This article assesses two of these devices: s 350 of theSuperannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 <\/em>(Cth) and s 5E of the Corporations Act2001 <\/em>(Cth), and identifies the crucial role played by s 109 of the Australian Constitution inthe curatorial process governed by those provisions. The article is also concerned with thepotential for less obvious examples of regulatory overlap to go unnoticed, and examinesspecific examples that illustrate this potential.<\/p>\n The Increasing Intersection of Class Action and Regulatory Proceedings and Its Implications for the Operation and Utility of Australia\u2019s Class Action Regime<\/strong><\/em><\/a> \u2013 Simon Hochreiter<\/p>\n A recent consensus has emerged between courts and practitioners which indicates thatthe intersection of class action and regulatory proceedings is becoming more prevalent.The intersection of such proceedings creates challenges for Australian courts, parties andpractitioners who are burdened with their co-ordination and disposition. It also posesthought-provoking questions regarding the utility of class action proceedings, in thelimited circumstances where the relief which they seek is akin to that sought in a parallelregulatory proceeding. This article considers these issues in the context of a suite of recenthigh-profile parallel class action and regulatory proceedings. It also examines why thenotable increase in intersecting class action and regulatory proceedings has emerged.<\/p>\n BOOK REVIEWS<\/a> \u2013 Editor: Angelina Gomez<\/em><\/p>\n For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: New Westlaw Australia – ALJ Vol 99 No 2 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n Click here to access this Part on New Westlaw AU<\/a><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Articles<\/h3>\n
\n