{"id":3365,"date":"2012-03-08T17:48:32","date_gmt":"2012-03-08T06:48:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/?p=3365"},"modified":"2012-03-08T17:48:32","modified_gmt":"2012-03-08T06:48:32","slug":"the-queensland-lawyer-update-march-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/2012\/03\/08\/the-queensland-lawyer-update-march-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"The Queensland Lawyer update: March 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"

The latest issue of the The Queensland Lawyer<\/em> (Volume 32 Part 1) contains the following material:<\/p>\n

EDITORIAL<\/a><\/p>\n

Article<\/h3>\n

Supporting the right to fair trial with reforms to jury directions and jury selection<\/em><\/strong><\/a> <\/strong>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/em>Paula Rogers<\/p>\n

Proposals for law reform on jury directions and jury selection have recently been made by the Queensland Law Reform Commission. This article provides an analysis of some of the Commission\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s key recommendations through the lens of the right to a fair trial. The recommendations of interest are those for the use of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153integrated directions\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and for changes to the occupational categories of jury service ineligibility. It seeks to demonstrate that reforms to jury directions and jury selection can play an important role in ensuring that a jury trial is a fair trial.<\/p>\n

To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Sections<\/h3>\n

CONVEYANCING AND PROPERTY LAW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Dr Bill Dixon<\/em><\/p>\n