{"id":3724,"date":"2012-06-06T17:29:44","date_gmt":"2012-06-06T07:29:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/?p=3724"},"modified":"2012-06-06T17:29:44","modified_gmt":"2012-06-06T07:29:44","slug":"building-and-construction-law-journal-update-june-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/2012\/06\/06\/building-and-construction-law-journal-update-june-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Building and Construction Law Journal update: June 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The latest issue of the <em>Building and Construction Law Journal <\/em>(Volume 28 Part 2) contains the following material:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultDetailed.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3&amp;contentSourceHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3\/articles\/163_E\/fulltext&amp;tocType=fullText&amp;hitListPageContext=http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultSummary.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3___tocType=fullText___sortBy=publicationYear\/articleDate&amp;searchId=17&amp;hit=1&amp;hits=6&amp;articleType=fulltext&amp;freeText=&amp;titleCode=E\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">EDITORIAL<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Construction community values<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultDetailed.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3&amp;contentSourceHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3\/articles\/164\/fulltext&amp;tocType=fullText&amp;hitListPageContext=http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultSummary.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3___tocType=fullText___sortBy=publicationYear\/articleDate&amp;searchId=17&amp;hit=2&amp;hits=6&amp;articleType=fulltext&amp;freeText=&amp;titleCode=Br\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">BOOK REVIEW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <em>Michael Christie SC<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Construction Law <\/em>by Julian Bailey<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Articles<\/h3>\n<p><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultDetailed.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3&amp;contentSourceHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3\/articles\/169\/fulltext&amp;tocType=fullText&amp;hitListPageContext=http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultSummary.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3___tocType=fullText___sortBy=publicationYear\/articleDate&amp;searchId=17&amp;hit=3&amp;hits=6&amp;articleType=fulltext&amp;freeText=&amp;titleCode=SardiaiA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Swings and roundabouts \u00e2\u20ac\u201c developments in arbitration in Australia<\/a> <\/em><\/strong>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c AA de Fina<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The introduction of amendments to the International Arbitration Act and domestic arbitration acts is widely seen as establishing a new and beneficial environment for arbitration in Australia. The reality is that little has changed. Courts in differing jurisdictions still interpret provisions inconsistently and the suggestion that Australia is an arbitration friendly environment is not supportable on careful analysis. Much more needs to be done from knowledge rather than political expediency.<\/p>\n<p>To purchase this article, complete the <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/subscribe-or-purchase\/individual-article-sale\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to <a href=\"mailto:tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com\">tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultDetailed.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3&amp;contentSourceHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3\/articles\/176\/fulltext&amp;tocType=fullText&amp;hitListPageContext=http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultSummary.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3___tocType=fullText___sortBy=publicationYear\/articleDate&amp;searchId=17&amp;hit=4&amp;hits=6&amp;articleType=fulltext&amp;freeText=&amp;titleCode=EoudrtOiVLfpl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Enforcement of upstream duties relating to OHS in Victoria: Lessons from proportionate liability?<\/a> <\/em><\/strong>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c David Ulbrick and Edward Harrison<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As well as a number of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153direct duties\u00e2\u20ac\u009d on employers, employees and persons in the workplace regarding health and safety, the various statutes in the Commonwealth contain a variety of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153upstream duties\u00e2\u20ac\u009d on designers, manufacturers importers and installers of plant and equipment used in the workplace and, indeed, workplaces themselves. These \u00e2\u20ac\u0153upstream duties\u00e2\u20ac\u009d are difficult to enforce and therefore pursued with less vigour by the various inspectorates. The article draws on the concept of proportionate liability and proposes a similar regime whereby the upstream duties might be more regularly and diligently enforced, and therefore adhered to as an extra limb to ensuring health and safety in the workplace.<\/p>\n<p>To purchase this article, complete the <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/subscribe-or-purchase\/individual-article-sale\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to <a href=\"mailto:tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com\">tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em><a href=\"http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultDetailed.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3&amp;contentSourceHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3\/articles\/189\/fulltext&amp;tocType=fullText&amp;hitListPageContext=http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultSummary.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3___tocType=fullText___sortBy=publicationYear\/articleDate&amp;searchId=17&amp;hit=5&amp;hits=6&amp;articleType=fulltext&amp;freeText=&amp;titleCode=Fmcdhatmrodc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u00e2\u20ac\u0153From my cold, dead hands\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00e2\u20ac\u201c addressing the moral rights of design consultants<\/a> <\/em><\/strong>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Andrew Murray<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After over a decade, the moral rights provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (the Act) still have not been the subject of significant judicial comment. High profile disputes have thrown up a number of issues about their application to the construction industry and yet, there is still no definitive guide for parties on how to address them \u00e2\u20ac\u201c either during the drafting process or when substantive alteration or demolition of structures is contemplated. This article discusses moral rights in the context of the construction industry and provides some practical suggestions as to how the processes envisioned by the Act may work in practice.<\/p>\n<p>To purchase this article, complete the <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/subscribe-or-purchase\/individual-article-sale\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to <a href=\"mailto:tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com\">tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultDetailed.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3&amp;contentSourceHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3\/articles\/202\/fulltext&amp;tocType=fullText&amp;hitListPageContext=http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultSummary.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/BCL\/volumes\/28\/parts\/3___tocType=fullText___sortBy=publicationYear\/articleDate&amp;searchId=17&amp;hit=6&amp;hits=6&amp;articleType=fulltext&amp;freeText=&amp;titleCode=R\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">REPORTS<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Walton v Illawarra<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Lucas Stuart Pty Ltd v Hemmes Hermitage Pty Ltd<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For the pdf version of the table of contents, click here:\u00c2\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/2012\/06\/06\/building-and-construction-law-journal-update-june-2012\/bldg-constn-law-jnl-conts-vol-28-no-3-jun-12\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-3749\">BCL Vol 28 Pt 3 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/tocectory?ndd=1&amp;ao=o.AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I3e215139aeb511e18eefa443f89988a0&amp;stnew=true&amp;srb=fulltext#advs-hide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Click here to access this Part on Westlaw AU<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The June 2012 issue of the Building and Construction Law Journal includes three interesting articles covering a range of topics related to building and construction law. The first article is by AA de Fina and looks at developments in arbitration in Australia. The second article comes from David Ulbrick and Edward Harrison and discusses the enforcement of upstream duties relating to OHS in Victoria. The final article is by Andrew Murray and discusses moral rights in the context of the construction industry and provides some practical suggestions as to how the processes envisioned by the Copyright Act 1968 may work in practice. There are also two Reports, an editorial and a book review.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42,39],"tags":[2014,2015,47,40,48,2016,2017,668,2018,2019,618,2020,159,44,2021,2022],"class_list":["post-3724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-building-and-construction-law-journal","category-update-summaries","tag-aa-de-fina","tag-andrew-murray","tag-arbitration","tag-bcl","tag-book-review","tag-david-ulbrick","tag-design-consultants","tag-developments","tag-edward-harrison","tag-lucas-stuart-pty-ltd-v-hemmes-hermitage-pty-ltd","tag-michael-christie-sc","tag-moral-rights","tag-ohs","tag-proportionate-liability","tag-upstream-duties","tag-walton-v-illawarra"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3724\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}