{"id":4443,"date":"2012-12-14T16:04:07","date_gmt":"2012-12-14T05:04:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/?p=4443"},"modified":"2012-12-14T16:04:07","modified_gmt":"2012-12-14T05:04:07","slug":"family-law-review-update-december-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/2012\/12\/14\/family-law-review-update-december-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"Family Law Review update: December 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU. If you are still using Legal Online, the links can be found in the LOLA PDF at the bottom of this post.<\/p>\n<p>The latest issue of the <em>Family Law Review<\/em> (Volume 3 Part 1) contains the following material:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/document?endChunk=1&amp;fromToc=true&amp;startChunk=1&amp;docguid=I42c33947425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&amp;isTocNav=true&amp;tocGuid=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c33949425511e28abce6b64809e9e1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">EDITORIAL<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Article<\/h3>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/document?endChunk=1&amp;fromToc=true&amp;startChunk=1&amp;docguid=I42c3394c425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&amp;isTocNav=true&amp;tocGuid=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c33940425511e28abce6b64809e9e1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Re-examining habitual residence as the sole connecting factor in Hague Convention child abduction cases <\/strong><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/em>Danielle Bozin-Odhiambo<\/p>\n<p>This article critiques the usefulness of habitual residence as the sole connecting factor in Hague Convention child abduction cases. This is achieved by examining the quality of this jurisdiction in light of changes in the gender dynamics underpinning international parental child abduction and the transnational family phenomenon. Arguably, the child\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s habitual residence as a home environment of the nature anticipated by the Convention\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s drafters is an increasingly outdated construct. This is due to an increase in both the number of abducting primary-carer mothers, and their families\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 growing mobility. Judicial determinations of habitual residence made during Convention return proceedings are entrenched in the state-centric paradigm. This paradigm is becoming increasingly incompatible with the lives of families which experience international parental child abduction.<\/p>\n<p>To purchase this article, complete the <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/subscribe-or-purchase\/individual-article-sale\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to <a href=\"mailto:tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com\">tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Sections<\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/document?endChunk=1&amp;fromToc=true&amp;startChunk=1&amp;docguid=I42c33942425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&amp;isTocNav=true&amp;tocGuid=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c33943425511e28abce6b64809e9e1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PROFESSIONAL INSIGHTS<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Relying on s 60CC(6) of the Family Law Act: Matters involving children who are of Indigenous descent <\/strong><em>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Joshua Creamer<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Issues of Aboriginal culture and the role of the Full Court <\/strong><em>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Simon Moodie<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/document?endChunk=1&amp;fromToc=true&amp;startChunk=1&amp;docguid=I42c33948425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&amp;isTocNav=true&amp;tocGuid=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c33946425511e28abce6b64809e9e1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CHILD SUPPORT UPDATE<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Drafting child support agreements <\/strong><em>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Brett Walker-Roberts<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/document?endChunk=1&amp;fromToc=true&amp;startChunk=1&amp;docguid=I42c33945425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&amp;isTocNav=true&amp;tocGuid=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c33944425511e28abce6b64809e9e1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <em>Alexandra Harland (Ed)<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The response of United Kingdom surrogacy law to the global surrogacy industry <\/strong><em>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Natalie Gamble<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/document?endChunk=1&amp;fromToc=true&amp;startChunk=1&amp;docguid=I42c3394a425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&amp;isTocNav=true&amp;tocGuid=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c3394e425511e28abce6b64809e9e1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IN THE HIGH COURT<\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Hague Convention, international child abduction: Garning v Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services and related proceedings <\/strong><em>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Michelle Fernando<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Property settlement, intact marriage, death of party, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153just and equitable\u00e2\u20ac\u009d requirement: Stanford v Stanford <\/strong><em>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Michelle Fernando<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/wlau\/app\/document?endChunk=1&amp;fromToc=true&amp;startChunk=1&amp;docguid=I42c33941425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&amp;isTocNav=true&amp;tocGuid=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c3394f425511e28abce6b64809e9e1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">RECENT CASES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <em>Geoffrey Monahan FM (Ed)<\/em>, <em>Dean Foley<\/em>, <em>Olivia Rundle<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Palmer v Palmer <\/strong>(Property division; Superannuation)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Baranski v Baranski <\/strong>(Procedural fairness; Courtroom observations; Extrinsic material)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For the pdf version of the table of contents, click here:\u00c2\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/2012\/12\/14\/family-law-review-update-december-2012\/lola-fam-l-rev-vol-3-no-1-contents-dec-2012\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4458\">LOLA &#8211; Fam L Rev Vol 3 Pt 1 Contents<\/a> or here:\u00c2\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/2012\/12\/14\/family-law-review-update-december-2012\/wau-fam-l-rev-vol-3-no-1-contents-dec-2012\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-4459\">WAU &#8211; Fam L Rev Vol 3 Pt 1 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westlaw.com.au\/maf\/api\/tocectory?ndd=1&amp;ao=o.AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||I42c3394b425511e28abce6b64809e9e1&amp;stnew=true&amp;parentinfo=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC||Ic2a105e03e9811e28abce6b64809e9e1%3E%3CVolume%203&amp;srb=fulltext#advs-hide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Click here to access this Part on Westlaw AU<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/legalonline.thomson.com.au\/jour\/resultSummary.jsp?curRequestedHref=journals\/FAMLREV\/volumes\/3\/parts\/1&amp;tocType=fullText&amp;sortBy=publicationYear\/articleDate\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Click here to access this Part on Legal Online<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The latest Part of the Family Law Review publishes an article by Danielle Bozin-Odhiambo which critiques the usefulness of habitual residence as the sole connecting factor in Hague Convention child abduction cases. There are also two notes in Professional Insights, a Child Support Update, an International Family Law section, two notes regarding cases before the High Court and a Recent Cases section. Something for everyone!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[120,39],"tags":[2793,2794,658,2795,119,2796,133,2797,662,2798,664,781],"class_list":["post-4443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-family-law-review","category-update-summaries","tag-baranski-v-baranski","tag-child-abduction","tag-child-support-update","tag-danielle-bozin-odhiambo","tag-fam-l-rev","tag-habitual-residence","tag-hague-convention","tag-in-the-high-court","tag-international-family-law","tag-palmer-v-palmer","tag-professional-insights","tag-recent-cases"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4443\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.thomsonreuters.com.au\/journals\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}