*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
NB: <\/strong>Please note that Legal Online will be decommissioned on 31 December 2013<\/b>. From now on, all updates will include links for Westlaw AU only<\/b> (with the exception of the Journals available on Checkpoint, which will have an extra PDF). For further information, please click here<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n The latest issue of the Criminal Law Journal <\/em>(Volume 37 Part 6) contains the following material:<\/p>\n EDITORIAL<\/a><\/p>\n Parole and parole authorities in Australia: A system in crisis? <\/i><\/b><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Lorana Bartels<\/p>\n The issue of parole has received significant attention in Australia in the wake of the high profile killing of Jill Meagher by parolee Adrian Bayley. This article presents an overview of the laws governing the decision to grant and revoke parole, including the factors that parole authorities must consider. The imposition of parole conditions is also examined. The article then presents a review of recent data on parole decision-making from each State and Territory, as well as considering recent legal and policy developments. The article concludes that parole serves multiple purposes and parole authorities have an important, if controversial, role to play in the justice system. Accordingly, they require adequate support to perform this role appropriately.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n Naming young offenders: Implications of research for reform <\/i><\/b><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Jodie O\u00e2\u20ac\u2122Leary<\/p>\n Recently it was reported that Queensland\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Liberal National Party Government is considering proposing amendments to the State\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s juvenile justice legislation to expand the ability to name recidivist young offenders. This article suggests that such a proposal does not align with the evidence regarding juvenile development and offending, and will be ineffective as a deterrent, as well as increasing stigmatising potential. The article considers whether the provisions on naming in other States and Territories are better aligned with the available evidence. It concludes that the approach taken in the majority of jurisdictions, which rests on a presumption against naming, should be considered best practice.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n Sentencing review 2012-2013 <\/i><\/b><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c Kate Warner<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n
Articles<\/h3>\n
Sections<\/h3>\n