*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the\u00c2\u00a0Australian Law Journal<\/em> (Volume\u00c2\u00a088 Part 11) contains the following material:<\/p>\n CURRENT ISSUES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Acting Justice Peter W Young AO<\/b><\/p>\n CONVEYANCING AND PROPERTY<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Peter Butt<\/b><\/p>\n CRIME AND EVIDENCE<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Justice Phillip Priest<\/b><\/p>\n AROUND THE NATION: NORTHERN TERRITORY<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Hon Dean Mildren AM RFD QC<\/b><\/p>\n ADMINISTRATIVE LAW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Justice Melissa Perry<\/b><\/p>\n AROUND THE NATION: WESTERN AUSTRALIA<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Justice Kenneth Martin<\/b><\/p>\n PERSONALIA<\/a>: \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Sienna Merope<\/b><\/p>\n Commonwealth<\/b><\/p>\n Queensland<\/b><\/p>\n CORPORATIONS AND SECURITIES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Robert Baxt AO<\/b><\/p>\n INTERNATIONAL FOCUS<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Ryszard Piotrowicz<\/b><\/p>\n RECENT CASES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Acting Justice Peter W Young AO<\/b><\/p>\n Equity: The soul and spirit of all law or a roguish thing? \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Lehane Lecture 2014<\/i><\/b><\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Lord David Neuberger<\/p>\n This speech, by a leading English equity lawyer, now President of the English Supreme Court, makes the case that equity is alive and well in England and that there have been at least nine leading equity cases decided by the Supreme Court in the recent year. It also makes the point that some revered equity judges whose judgments display an impressive and intimidating confidence, appear, when tested by the passage of time, to have demonstrated a lack of consistency and a fallibility which did not quite justify that confidence. Many of them have occasionally been judicial Pied Pipers leading future generations of judges into mountains of error where they rested for a long time.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>. <\/i><\/b><\/p>\n ACCC compulsory examinations: Does the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153accusatorial\u00e2\u20ac\u009d principle of criminal justice affect them?<\/i><\/b><\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Peter Strickland<\/p>\n The High Court\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s recent decisions in X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92, Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 87 ALJR 1082 and Lee v The Queen (2014) 88 ALJR 656 address the scope of certain statutory compulsory examination powers in crime commission investigations and recovery of proceeds of crime proceedings. These decisions also explore the extent to which the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153accusatorial\u00e2\u20ac\u009d nature of criminal justice influences the interpretation of those powers. Importantly, it is likely that the compulsory examination powers of other statutory agencies, like the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, will be affected by these recent decisions. This article examines the extent to which the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153accusatorial\u00e2\u20ac\u009d principle of criminal justice is likely to affect the proper construction of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s compulsory examination power. Specifically, this article considers the extent to which oral evidence obtained compulsorily by the Commission can be used, both directly and indirectly, in investigating and prosecuting the individual who gave that evidence.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>. <\/i><\/b><\/p>\n For the pdf version of the table of contents, click here: WAU – ALJ Vol 88 Pt 11 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Articles<\/h3>\n