*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the\u00c2\u00a0Australian Law Journal<\/em> (Volume\u00c2\u00a089 Part 5) contains the following material:<\/p>\n CURRENT ISSUES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Guest Editor: Ruth Higgins<\/strong><\/p>\n LETTER TO THE EDITOR<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n CONVEYANCING AND PROPERTY<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Peter Butt<\/strong><\/p>\n PERSONALIA<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Clare Langford<\/strong><\/p>\n Commonwealth<\/strong><\/p>\n New South Wales:Update<\/strong><\/p>\n Western Australia<\/strong><\/p>\n FAMILY LAW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Anthony Dickey QC<\/strong><\/p>\n HUMAN RIGHTS<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Simon Rice<\/strong><\/p>\n RECENT CASES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Guest Editor: Ruth Higgins<\/strong><\/p>\n The United States and the Australian Constitution: Influence of US Constitutional model on development and interpretation of the Australian Constitution<\/em><\/strong><\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/strong>Kathleen Morris and James Allsop AO<\/p>\n Over the past two centuries the United States\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 Constitution has played an important role in inspiring and shaping the content and development of Australian constitutional law. This article explores the extent of that influence by considering the key discussions of the Australian constitutional framers, undertaking a brief comparison of the text of the two Constitutions, and reviewing the High Court\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s approach to the use of American precedents over the past century.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n Reassessment of Robert Menzies\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 contribution in the Engineers Case<\/em><\/strong><\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/strong>Gerard Carney<\/p>\n The recent discovery of Sir Robert Menzies\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 handwritten notes made for and during his appearance as counsel in the Engineers\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 Case in 1920 provides a unique insight into the six days of that hearing, of which no transcript exists. They also allow a reassessment of his role as a young 25-year-old barrister, opposed by a formidable line-up of counsel representing the States. This article attempts to piece together the line of argument each day, as well as something of the atmosphere in the High Court and the personalities of the other counsel.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n BOOK REVIEWS<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Angelina Gomez<\/strong><\/p>\n For the pdf version of the table of contents, click here:\u00c2\u00a0ALJ Vol 89 No 5 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Articles<\/h3>\n
\n