*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the Building and Construction Law Journal <\/em>(Volume 31 Part 3) contains the following material:<\/p>\n EDITORIAL<\/a><\/p>\n Is evaluative mediation the preferred model for construction law disputes? <\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/em>Chris Lenz<\/p>\n This article uses a hypothetical mediation example to explore the question of whether the evaluative model is the preferred process to settle construction law disputes. It looks at recent research in other common law jurisdictions, as well as the prominent dispute resolution researchers to further examine the issue.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n Interface risk<\/em><\/strong><\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/em>Paul Tobin<\/p>\n Managing interface risk requires a whole of contract approach, and a number of common contractual provisions may be relevant. AS 4902-2000, AS 4300-1995, GC21 (Ed 2) and FIDIC contracts are commonly used in high value construction projects, but do not manage interface risks adequately. This article identifies significant opportunities for improvement in each of those standard forms and suggests that alliancing, multipartite deeds, regular project meetings, programming, building information modelling and other legal and project management techniques can be useful in managing interface risks.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n REPORTS<\/p>\n\n
Articles<\/h3>\n