*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.<\/p>\n
The latest issue of the\u00c2\u00a0Australian Law Journal<\/em> (Volume\u00c2\u00a089 Part 8) contains the following material:<\/p>\n CURRENT ISSUES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Acting Justice Peter W Young AO<\/strong><\/p>\n CONVEYANCING AND PROPERTY<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Peter Butt<\/strong><\/p>\n AROUND THE NATION: QUEENSLAND<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c John McKenna QC<\/strong><\/p>\n CRIME AND EVIDENCE<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Justice Phillip Priest<\/strong><\/p>\n PERSONALIA<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Clare Langford<\/strong><\/p>\n Commonwealth: High Court of Australia<\/strong><\/p>\n Commonwealth: Federal Court of Australia<\/strong><\/p>\n New South Wales<\/strong><\/p>\n Northern Territory: Update<\/strong><\/p>\n Queensland<\/strong><\/p>\n South Australia<\/strong><\/p>\n Victoria<\/strong><\/p>\n Western Australia<\/strong><\/p>\n OVERSEAS LAW<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Colin Picker<\/strong><\/p>\n AROUND THE NATION: NORTHERN TERRITORY<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Hon Dean Mildren AM RFD QC<\/strong><\/p>\n ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Dr Damien J Cremean<\/strong><\/p>\n CORPORATIONS AND SECURITIES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Robert Baxt AO<\/strong><\/p>\n RECENT CASES<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Acting Justice Peter W Young AO<\/strong><\/p>\n Faulty refinancing: Subrogation, Torrens and the PPSA<\/a><\/em><\/strong> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/strong>Hon W M C Gummow AC and J G H Stumbles<\/p>\n The co-existence of equitable remedies with statutory regimes illustrates equity\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s vitality and versatility. In this article, we examine the availability of subrogation in relation to securities over Torrens land and PPSA security interests and how subrogation may apply in a way which is consistent with each of these regimes. The analysis also demonstrates differences in the operation of subrogation in relation to Torrens land and personal property.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n Interpreting statutes and contracts: A distinction without a difference?<\/a><\/em><\/strong> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c <\/strong>Jacinta Dharmananda and Leon Firios<\/p>\n The intuition felt by many legal practitioners is that the process of interpreting statutes is somehow different to the approach taken to interpreting private agreements. In a paper delivered over a decade ago, then Justice Michael Kirby of the High Court of Australia noted the dearth of comparative analysis of the two disciplines, and went on to sketch what he perceived to be the similarities and differences. This article takes up Justice Kirby\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s cause and explores the extent to which contractual interpretation and statutory interpretation really do differ. On closer inspection it seems that there is, in fact, little difference of major significance. The article concludes with some reflections on the variables at play in interpretation beyond the nature of the instrument being interpreted.<\/p>\n To purchase this article, complete the Individual Article Sale<\/a> order form and email it to tlranz.journal.orders@thomsonreuters.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n BOOK REVIEWS<\/a> \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Editor: Angelina Gomez<\/strong><\/p>\n OBITUARY<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n For the pdf version of the table of contents, click here: ALJ Vol 89 No 8 Contents<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Articles<\/h3>\n
\n
\n