1. Home
  2. Update Summaries

Update Summaries

Criminal Law Journal update: Vol 44 Pt 5

By journalalerts on January 5, 2021

The latest Part of the Criminal Law Journal includes the following articles: "Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing and Memory: A Dilemma for the Criminal Justice System" – Greg Walsh OAM; and "Bail in Extradition Proceedings" – Matthew Groves. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial: "Can the Pandemic Induced Fall in Prison Numbers Lead to Durable Principled Sentencing Reform?"; Case and Comment: "R v Sunderland [2020] QCA 156" – Deborah Kim; Sentencing Review: "Sentencing Review 2019–2020"; and Digest of Criminal Law Cases.

Posted In:  Criminal Law Journal (Crim LJ)  Tagged:   "special circumstances" test for bail in extradition proceedings   articles   Bail in Extradition Proceedings   Cabal v United Mexican States   Can the Pandemic Induced Fall in Prison Numbers Lead to Durable Principled Sentencing Reform?   Case and Comment   Crim LJ   Deborah Kim   Digest of criminal law cases   Editorial   Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing and Memory: A Dilemma for the Criminal Justice System   Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing therapy (EMDR)   false memories   Greg Walsh OAM   Lorana Bartels   Matthew Groves   Mirko Bagaric   R v Sunderland [2020] QCA 156   sentencing review   Sentencing Review 2019–2020   the science of memory 

Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice update: Vol 31 Pt 3

By journalalerts on January 5, 2021

The latest Part of the Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice includes the following articles: "Reserve Bank of New Zealand Decision-Making – Is a Governance Board the Best Option for Prudential Regulation?" – Helen Dervan and Simon Jensen; "Community Standards and Expectations: Has There Been a Fundamental Shift in the Obligations on Financial Services Licensees under Pt 7.6 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)?" – Patrick Hall; and "Conceptual Models of the PPSA Security Interest: Moving Beyond the Unitary/ Minimalist Dichotomy" – Adam Waldman. Also in this Part are the following Sections: Commercial and Finance Law: "Case Note: Westgem Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 6)" – JFW Cardell-Oliver; Hong Kong and China: "Luckin Coffee: A Chinese Fraud or Just Fraud?" – Fabian Roday and William Fotherby; Tokyo: "Amended Rules in Relation to Assignment of Accounts Receivable" – Masahiro Ueno; and United Kingdom and Europe: "Legislative Brinkmanship and Equivalence Decisions" – Deborah A Sabalot.

Posted In:  Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice (JBFLP)  Tagged:   Adam Waldman   Amended Rules in Relation to Assignment of Accounts Receivable   Andrew Booth   articles   Banking Royal Commission's Final Report   Case Note: Westgem Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (No 6)   Commercial and financial law   community expectations   community standards   Community Standards and Expectations: Has There Been a Fundamental Shift in the Obligations on Financial Services Licensees under Pt 7.6 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)?   Conceptual Models of the PPSA Security Interest: Moving Beyond the Unitary/ Minimalist Dichotomy   David McIlroy QC   Deborah A Sabalot   Dr Matteo Solinas   Explanatory Memorandum   Fabian Roday   Helen Dervan   Hong Kong and China   JBFLP   JFW Cardell-Oliver   John Jarvis QC   Legislative Brinkmanship and Equivalence Decisions   Luckin Coffee: A Chinese Fraud or Just Fraud?   Masahiro Ueno   minimalist model   optimal decision-making structure for prudential regulation and supervision   Patrick Hall   Patrick Lowden   Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth)   Professor Chao Xi   Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 (NZ)   Reserve Bank of New Zealand Decision-Making – Is a Governance Board the Best Option for Prudential Regulation?   s 912A(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)   Simon Jensen   statutory committee structure   Tokyo   unitary model   United Kingdom and Europe   William Fotherby 

Journal of Judicial Administration update: Vol 30 Pt 2

By journalalerts on January 5, 2021

The latest Part of the Journal of Judicial Administration includes the following articles: "Path Dependency, the High Court, and the Constitution" – Jeremy Patrick; "Homelessness and Contact with the Criminal Justice System: Insights from Magistrates in Australia" – Julia Quilter, Luke McNamara, Tamara Walsh and Thalia Anthony; and "COVID-19: An Exceptional or Surrounding Circumstance for the Purposes of Bail and Sentencing?" – Natalia Antolak-Saper.

Posted In:  Journal of Judicial Administration (JJA)  Tagged:   articles   bail and sentencing   COVID-19: An Exceptional or Surrounding Circumstance for the Purposes of Bail and Sentencing?   criminal courts   criminalisation and homelessness   developing criminal justice measures to appropriately deal with pandemics   disruption to bail criminal jury trials and prisons   doctrines of Australian constitutional law   homeless defendants   Homelessness and Contact with the Criminal Justice System: Insights from Magistrates in Australia   Jeremy Patrick   JJA   judicial decision-making   Julia Quilter   Luke McNamara   Natalia Antolak-Saper   Path Dependency the High Court and the Constitution   social distancing and lockdowns   Tamara Walsh   temporality   Thalia Anthony   therapeutic jurisprudence approaches   Victorian Supreme Court bail and sentencing decisions 

Australian Law Journal update: Vol 94 Pt 12

By journalalerts on December 29, 2020

The latest Part of the Australian Law Journal contains the following articles: "Responsible Jurimetrics: A Reply To Silbert's Critique Of The Victorian Court Of Appeal" - Brian Opeskin and Gabrielle Appleby; "Directors' Duties In A Post-Hayne World: "The Company" As More Than The Sum Of Its Shareholders" - Philip Sales; "Some Reservations About The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Sentencing Decisions" - Adrian Staples; and "100 Years Of Speaking: Gender Equality Among Barristers Before The High Court" - Winsome Hall and George Williams. This Part also includes the following sections: Current Issues; Letter to the Editor; Conveyancing and Property; Around the Nation: Northern Territory; Class Actions; Recent Cases; and Book Review.

Posted In:  Australian Law Journal, The (ALJ)  Tagged:   100 Years Of Speaking: Gender Equality Among Barristers Before The High Court   130 Years of Sydney University Law School   A History of Criminal Law in New South Wales Volume 2: The New State 1901–1955   Adrian Staples   Adverse Possession – Alive and Well in Sydney   ALJ   Angelina Gomez   Appellant Sentenced to Imprisonment Served by Periodic Detention   Appellant Unlawfully Imprisoned for 82 Days Following Sentence   Around the Nation: Northern Territory   articles   artificial intelligence assisting judges with sentence determination   AustLII Turns 25   book review   Brendan Edgeworth   Brian Opeskin   civil society   class actions   Compensatory Principle and Counterfactual Analysis   Contingency Fees (Group Costs Orders) in Victoria after BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster   Conveyancing and property   Court's performance   criminal decisions of the Victorian Court of Appeal (VCA)   current Australian sentencing practises   Current issues   Directors' Duties In A Post-Hayne World: "The Company" As More Than The Sum Of Its Shareholders   Do We Need a Parliament?   false imprisonment   Farewell RBG and Welcome ACB   female barristers   Gabrielle Appleby   GD Woods   George Williams   Hon Dean Mildren AM RFD QC   how decision-making by companies can be incentivised   imposition of duties on company directors   Jesse Cumberland's High Court Case "Zooms-in" on Procedural Fairness and Residual Discretion   Justice François Kunc   Justice Michael B J Lee   letter to the editor   managing tensions between shareholder interests and those of creditors employees consumers and the environment   participation of women as advocates before the High Court of Australia   Philip Sales   Recent cases   regulation   Responsible Jurimetrics: A Reply To Silbert's Critique Of The Victorian Court Of Appeal   Robert Angyal SC   role of intermediate courts of appeal   Ruth C A Higgins SC   setting the environment for commercial activity   Snapshot of Chinese Land Law: Real Rights Transfer and In/defeasible Title   Some Reservations About The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Sentencing Decisions   taxation   That Was the Year That Was   The Curated Page   The Final Obsequies for the Bell Litigation   The Launch of the Digital Law Association   Two New High Court Appointments   Where Appellant's Imprisonment Would Otherwise Have Lawfully Occurred   Whether Appellant Entitled to Substantial Compensatory or Vindicatory Damages   Whether Award of Only Nominal Damages Appropriate   Winsome Hall 

Australian Intellectual Property Journal update: Vol 31 Pt 2

By journalalerts on December 29, 2020

The latest Part of the Australian Intellectual Property Journal includes the following articles: "The Right to Repair: Perspectives from the United States" – Leah Chan Grinvald and Ofer Tur-Sinai; "European Steps to the Right to Repair: Towards a Comprehensive Approach to a Sustainable Lifespan of Products and Materials?" – Taina Pihlajarinne; "Anti-circumvention Prohibitions and the Function of the Work" – Graeme W Austin; "Revisiting the Repair Defence in the Designs Act (2003) in Light of the Right to Repair Movement and the Circular Economy" – Leanne Wiseman and Kanchana Kariyawasam; "Rewriting Judicial History or Just Refilling Ink? Patents and the Right to Repair in Australia Post-Calidad: "Logic, Simplicity and Coherence with Legal Principle" Prevail over "Rights Which They Have Held for More Than a Century"" – Michael Williams and Vanessa Farago-Diener; and "Certified Repairable: Using Trade Marks to Distinguish, Signal and Encourage Repair" – Jay Sanderson and Teddy Henriksen. There is also an Editorial by Leanne Wiseman and Kanchana Kariyawasam.

Posted In:  Australian Intellectual Property Journal (AIPJ)  Tagged:   "comprehensible and consistent" doctrine of exhaustion of patents   "spare parts" defence to designs infringement   AIPJ   Anti-circumvention Prohibitions and the Function of the Work   articles   automobile right to repair campaign from 2011 to 2012   basic copyright principles   Calidad litigation   Certified Repairable: Using Trade Marks to Distinguish Signal and Encourage Repair   competition law policy and principles   consumer rights ideology   copyright-protected computer programs   Editorial   embedded computer programs protected by technological protection measures (TPMs)   encouraging a more "green" and sustainable designs scheme for Australia   European Steps to the Right to Repair: Towards a Comprehensive Approach to a Sustainable Lifespan of Products and Materials?   European Union law   federal intellectual property laws   GM Global Technology Operations LLC v SSS Auto Parts Pty Ltd   Graeme W Austin   incentive for innovative and creative work   incorporation of CE concepts in intellectual property right (IPR) doctrines   Jay Sanderson   Kanchana Kariyawasam   Leah Chan Grinvald   Leanne Wiseman   Michael Williams   Ofer Tur-Sinai   provision of information about the repairability of goods   repair social movement   repair vs remaking   repairable trade mark   Revisiting the Repair Defence in the Designs Act (2003) in Light of the Right to Repair Movement and the Circular Economy   Rewriting Judicial History or Just Refilling Ink? Patents and the Right to Repair in Australia Post-Calidad: "Logic   secondary or re-manufacturing/refurbishing markets   sections on "authorised use" and "control" in the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)   Simplicity and Coherence with Legal Principle" Prevail over "Rights Which They Have Held for More Than a Century"   State-level consumer protection legislation   steps taken to address barriers to repairs   Taina Pihlajarinne   Teddy Henriksen   the right to repair and the circular economy (CE) in Europe   The Right to Repair: Perspectives from the United States   trade marks   United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals   Vanessa Farago-Diener   what constitutes a repair of a patented product   willingness and desire to repair 

Australian Journal of Administrative Law update: Vol 27 Pt 4

By journalalerts on December 29, 2020

This Part includes the following articles: "Executive Detention in the Time of a Pandemic" – Anthony Gray; and "Deference as Non-jurisdictional Error" – Charlie Rotondo. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial: "Ministerial Adherence to the Law"; Casenote: "Northern Land Council v Quall [2020] HCA 33"; Current Issues: "Amenability of the Executive Power to Pardon to Judicial Review: Holzinger v Attorney-General (Qld) and Attorney-General (Cth) v Ogawa" – Samuel Walpole, Aaron Moss and William Isdale; and Book Review: "The Anatomy of Administrative Law", by Joanna Bell – Reviewed by Mark Aronson.

Posted In:  Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L)  Tagged:   Aaron Moss   AJ Admin L   Amenability of the Executive Power to Pardon to Judicial Review: Holzinger v Attorney-General (Qld) and Attorney-General (Cth) v Ogawa   Anthony Gray   articles   book review   breach of lockdown measures   Casenote   Charlie Rotondo   City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission   COVID-19 pandemic   Current issues   Deference as Non-jurisdictional Error   distinction between jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional errors of law   doctrine of deference   Dr Janina Boughey   Editorial   Executive Detention in the Time of a Pandemic   Greg Weeks   Joanna Bell   judicial review doctrine   legality of proposed detention   Mark Aronson   Matthew Groves   Ministerial Adherence to the Law   Nathalie Ng   Northern Land Council v Quall [2020] HCA 33   protection of the validity of an administrative decision   Samuel Walpole   separation of powers   The Anatomy of Administrative Law   William Isdale 

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 28 Pt 4

By journalalerts on December 29, 2020

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: "Batter Up: ACCC Proposes Compulsory "Final Offer Arbitration" for Disputes between Media Businesses and Digital Platforms in Australia" – Sam Luttrell and Dave Poddar; and "Asset Valuation Confusion under Australia's National Gas Rules" – Euan Morton and Matt Rodgers. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Access to Services; Defective Goods; Restrictive Trade Practices; Case Note; Council Considerations; Commission Cameos; What If ...; Comments from Commerce; Report from China; and Report from India.

Posted In:  Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL)  Tagged:   45-day compulsory Final Offer Arbitration process   Access to Services   AJCCL   articles   Asset Valuation Confusion under Australia's National Gas Rules   asset valuation methodology   Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)   Australian gas transmission pipelines   Batter Up: ACCC Proposes Compulsory Final Offer Arbitration for Disputes between Media Businesses and Digital Platforms in Australia   Bobby Jain   Case Note   Christopher Hodgekiss SC   Christopher Kok   Comments from Commerce   Commission Cameos   Competition in the Time of COVID-19   Council considerations   Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal Service – Implications for the Scope of Access Regulation   Dave Poddar   Defective Goods   Editorial   Euan Morton   Facebook   fair payment for news content   Google   Gym Equipment Higher Education Expectations and Framed Bathing Pools   Hank Spier   Information Disclosure and Arbitration Framework provisions under Pt 23 of the Australian National Gas Rules   John Hedge   Julie Clarke   Mandatory Bargaining Code   Matt Rodgers   Maureen Ip Hee Wai   Michael Gvozdenovic   Peter Strong   Pravin Anand   recovered capital method (RCM)   Report from China   Report from India   Resale Price Maintenance: A Stocktake   Restrictive trade practices   Russell Miller AM   Sam Luttrell   SAMR's Approach to Failing Firms   Sharon Henrick   Stephen Puttick   T H J Cadd   The Council's Work during 2019–2020   The Rise and Fall of a Legal Principle   Travel Issues During the Pandemic   Undertakings in Merger Proceedings Following Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pacific National Pty Ltd: Has the Train Left the Station?   Updates from Competition Law Regime for the Year 2019–2020   What If Australia Took More Notice of EU Competition Law?   What if... 

Building and Construction Law Journal update: Vol 36 Pt 3

By journalalerts on December 29, 2020

The latest Part of the Building and Construction Law Journal includes the following article: "Commentary on Amendments to the Construction Contracts (Security of Payments) Act 2004 (NT)" – Gordon Smith; an Editorial: "Specialist Technology and Construction Courts and Lists"; and Reports on the following cases: Brolton Group Pty Ltd v Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd; Duffy Kennedy Pty Ltd v Galileo Miranda Nominee Pty Ltd.

Posted In:  Building and Construction Law Journal (BCL)  Tagged:   adjustments to the adjudication process   articles   BCL   Brolton Group Pty Ltd v Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd   changes to the enforcement regime   Commentary on Amendments to the Construction Contracts (Security of Payments) Act 2004 (NT)   Duffy Kennedy Pty Ltd v Galileo Miranda Nominee Pty Ltd   Editorial   Gordon Smith   Michael Christie SC   Northern Territory legislation   Reports   scope of claims   Specialist Technology and Construction Courts and Lists   West Coast Model 

Workplace Review update: Summer 2020

By journalalerts on December 29, 2020

The Summer 2020 Part of the Workplace Review includes the following content: "Two Fat Gentlemen" – Bryan Belling; "Can Negative Deviance Spur Creativity with Positive Organisational Outcomes?" – David Nikolas Brodsky; "Future-proofing the Workplace: How COVID-19 Changed the Employment Landscape Forever" – Darren Gardner; "The Inconsistencies of Industrial Manslaughter Laws in the Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory" – Wazeem Kadir; "Employment Law and Law Firms" – Rick Manuel; as well as the following sections: Editorial; Interview: "Abiding Faiths: Judge Gerard Phillips" – Craig Ryan; Case Notes: "The Great Barrier Rift" – Xavier Boffa; "What's in a Day?" – El Leverington; "Arbitrary Exercise of a Discretion Kicked Out of the Park" – Lachlan Robison; Book Reviews: ""Letters to Lily Vale": The Life and Letters of Ernest William Latchford MC, MBE 1916 to 1919 France, Persia and Russia", by Mark Latchford – Reviewed by Jennifer Giles; "Sir Frederick Jordan: Fire under the Frost", by Keith Mason – Reviewed by Malcolm Kerr OAM; "IFMRO to IFHRO to IFHIMA: An Historical Overview 1949–2019", by Professor Phyllis J Watson AM – Reviewed by Craig Ryan; The Last Word; and Diary.

Posted In:  Journals  Tagged:   "academic" and "intellectual" freedom   "Letters to Lily Vale": The Life and Letters of Ernest William Latchford MC MBE 1916 to 1919 France Persia and Russia   "new normal"   10-day entitlement   Abiding Faiths: Judge Gerard Phillips   adapting to more flexible non-traditional ways of work   Arbitrary Exercise of a Discretion Kicked Out of the Park   articles   Australia's conciliation and arbitration system in the early years of Federation   Australia's union movement   Book reviews   Bryan Belling   Can Negative Deviance Spur Creativity with Positive Organisational Outcomes?   case notes   Charles Kingston and George Reid   complex problem-solving   compulsory conciliation and arbitration   continued support for creative processes among discordant team members   Craig Ryan   current state of research around workplace creativity   Darren Gardner   David Nikolas Brodsky   dealing with complaints of discrimination/harassment   deviant behaviour   Diary   Editorial   El Leverington   employee and union expectations of safe work arrangements   employee resilience   Employment Law and Law Firms   employment obligations of law firms and the penalties   Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)   flexible work   future proof the workplace from future pandemic risks and novel risks   Future-proofing the Workplace: How COVID-19 Changed the Employment Landscape Forever   Gageler and Edelman JJ (separately)   harsher punishment on employers and officers responsible for unlawfully causing the death of a worker in the workplace   IFMRO to IFHRO to IFHIMA: An Historical Overview 1949–2019   industrial manslaughter offences in the work health and safety laws   interpretation of enterprise agreements within the higher education sector   Interview   James Cook University v Ridd   Jennifer Giles   Judge Vasta in the Federal Circuit Court   Justice Rangiah in dissent   Keith Mason   Kiefel CJ Nettle and Gordon JJ (plurality)   l technological advancement and employer innovation   Lachlan Robison   loss in business resources caused by deviance   Malcolm Kerr OAM   Mark Latchford   Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd   National Employment Standards in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)   Neil Napper   positive or negative intentions when approaching teamwork   potential consequences of failing to comply with lawful and reasonable directions from employers   Professor Phyllis J Watson AM   remote labour   restraint of trade clauses   Rick Manuel   Sir Frederick Jordan: Fire under the Frost   smaller-shared or hubbed-remote workplaces   staff members' engagement in creative productivity   Subdiv A of Div 7 of Pt 2-2 of the Fair Work Act   team dynamics   technologically augmented work arrangements   terms of engagement of solicitors   the Federal Court majority on appeal   The Great Barrier Rift   The Inconsistencies of Industrial Manslaughter Laws in the Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory   The Last Word   the National Employment Standards' entitlement to paid personal/carer's leave   traditional labour market supply pay and conditions modalities   Two Fat Gentlemen   Wazeem Kadir   What's in a Day?   women's enfranchisement and right to stand for legislative office   WR   Xavier Boffa 

Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal update: Vol 30 Pt 4

By journalalerts on November 26, 2020

The latest Part of the Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal includes the following articles: "COVID-19, Remote Court Hearings, Automated Decision-making and Access to Justice" – The Hon Michael Kirby AC CMG; "COVID-19, Technology and Family Dispute Resolution" – Tania Sourdin, Bin Li, Stephanie Simm and Alexander Connolly; "A Call for a Multi-framework Approach to Family Dispute Resolution" – Joshua Taylor; "A "Curious Order" and the Inherent Power to Order Stays Pending Arbitration: Rex International Holding Ltd v Gulf Hibiscus Ltd" – Benjamin Teng and Hannah Williams; "Cause to Complain? Consumer Experiences of Internal and External Dispute Resolution in the Context of General Insurance" – Evgenia Bourova, Ian Ramsay and Paul Ali; and "Relevance of First Offers in Distributive and Integrative Negotiation" – Garvita Sethi. It also contains the following sections: Editorial – Ruth Charlton; ADR Case Notes: "Setting Aside a Deed of Settlement; Striking Out Pleadings Containing without Prejudice Privilege Communications; and Mediation Media Watch" – David Spencer; Matters of Interest: "From Industry Forum for Dispute Resolution to Council for Alternate Dispute Resolvers (14 May 2014–25 August 2020)" – Katherine Johnson; and Book Review: "Principles of Dispute Resolution", by David Spencer – Reviewed by Geoff Charlton.

Posted In:  Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal (ADRJ)  Tagged:   A "Curious Order" and the Inherent Power to Order Stays Pending Arbitration   A Call for a Multi-framework Approach to Family Dispute Resolution   ADR Case Notes   ADRJ   Alexander Connolly   anchoring effect in negotiations   articles   Audiovisual links hearings   Australian Financial Complaints Authority   barriers that can deter consumers from making use of complaints mechanisms   Benjamin Teng   Bin Li   book review   Cause to Complain? Consumer Experiences of Internal and External Dispute Resolution in the Context of General Insurance   consumers escalating complaints in relation to their claims   COVID-19 Remote Court Hearings Automated Decision-making and Access to Justice   COVID-19 Technology and Family Dispute Resolution   David Spencer   disruption to family law caused by COVID-19   distributive and integrative negotiations   Editorial   Evgenia Bourova   facilitative model of mediation   Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)   From Industry Forum for Dispute Resolution to Council for Alternate Dispute Resolvers (14 May 2014–25 August 2020)   Garvita Sethi   Geoff Charlton   Hannah Williams   Ian Ramsay   internal dispute resolution (IDR)   issues with compliance with the regulatory frameworks governing complaints   Joshua Taylor   justice apps   Katherine Johnson   Lax and Sebenius   Matters of Interest   mediation and arbitration   mediation media watch   Nadja Alexander's Mediation Meta-Model   Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) methods   Paul Ali   Principles of Dispute Resolution by David Spencer   Professor Susskind's ideas for change to improve access to justice   Relevance of First Offers in Distributive and Integrative Negotiation   Rex International Holding Ltd v Gulf Hibiscus Ltd   Ruth Charlton   separation process   Setting Aside a Deed of Settlement   Stephanie Simm   Striking Out Pleadings Containing without Prejudice Privilege Communications   supporting and facilitating family dispute resolution (FDR) during the pandemic   Tania Sourdin   The Hon Michael Kirby AC CMG   videoconferencing technology 
×Close