Australian Intellectual Property Journal update: Vol 33 Pt 3
By journalalerts on May 16, 2023
Posted In: Australian Intellectual Property Journal (AIPJ) Tagged: “behind the curtain” Age of AI AI AI and Copyright AI and copyright law protection AI and inventorship AI authorship AI capable of creativity? AI Ownership AI-augmented works AI-authored works AI-created works of art AIPJ Andrew Ray application of copyright’s authorship and joint authorship doctrines to creative processes involving AI articles artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence and the Right to Communicate to the Public in Copyright Australian copyright law Australian intellectual property Australian Intellectual Property Journal Australian intellectual property law Australian IP authorship and AI authorship and artificial intelligence Can AI invent? Can AI inventions be protected under copyright laws? Can human creativity be defined? Can machines replicate human creativity? ChatGPT ChatGPT and intellectual property ChatGPT and intellectual property law ChatGPT and IP copyright Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) copyright law Copyright Law and Originality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence copyright law’s concept of authorship in the face of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Creativity crisis within copyright law Daniela Simone Data Mining David J Brennan David Lindsay deep-learning AI Dianne Nicol Dilan Thampapillai Dr Stephan Thaler EU Copyright Exceptions for Text and Data Mining existential angst over autonomous AI creation replacing human creativity framing AI systems in anthropomorphic terms obscured input of creators Gilbert + Tobin how ready are intellectual property (IP) laws for the AI revolution? human creativity and AI Human creativity is the foundation of all current intellectual property (IP) regulatory frameworks implications for originality input of those behind the curtain Intellectual Property After Artificial Intelligence intellectual property law interaction between AI and inventions and creations under existing IP laws IP After AI Is AI Capable of Creativity Is AI Capable of Original Creativity? Louise Buckingham Michael Williams music or written expression originality as gatekeeping entry into the copyright system Real Impact of AI on IP Regulation Special Issue Special Issue on IP After AI Part 2 Thaler whether AI has the legal personality necessary to qualify as an inventor or creator whether copyright should permit AI authorship whether machines can ever be creative in the human sense