This Part includes the following articles: “Vexatious Applicant, Vexatious Application or Something Else? Dealing with Difficult Applicants under Freedom of Information Laws in Australia” – Mick Batskos; “The Value of Adjudicative Independence: Overlapping Conceptions of Administrative Justice in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal’s Review of Visa Cancellations” – Dr Chantal Bostock; and “The Blue Sky Effect: A Repatriation of Judicial Review or a Search for Flexibility?” – Simon Young. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial: “Soft Law and Liability in Tort”; Current Issues: “Letters to the Queen”; and Book Reviews: “More Essential (for Lawyers) Than Toilet Paper”, by Janina Boughey, Ellen Rock and Greg Weeks – Reviewed by Bruce Dyer; and “Interpreting Executive Power”, edited by Janina Boughey and Lisa Burton Crawford – Reviewed by Dr Maria O’Sullivan.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "materiality" overlay in jurisdictional error doctrine, AJ Admin L, articles, Book reviews, Bruce Dyer, bureaucratic rationality and legality, calibration of principle to statutory context, calibration to consequence, Current issues, Dr Chantal Bostock, Dr Maria O'Sullivan, Editorial, Ellen Rock, freedom of information (FOI) laws, Greg Weeks, independent merits review, Interpreting Executive Power, Janina Boughey, Justin Davidson, Letters to the Queen, Lisa Burton Crawford, Matthew Groves, maximising disclosure and maintaining government efficiency, Mick Batskos, misusing FOI laws, models of administrative justice, More Essential (for Lawyers) Than Toilet Paper, oppressive or disruptive behaviours, Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority, Simon Young, Soft Law and Liability in Tort, standards of administrative legality, The Blue Sky Effect: A Repatriation of Judicial Review or a Search for Flexibility?, The Value of Adjudicative Independence: Overlapping Conceptions of Administrative Justice in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal's Review of Visa Cancellations, Tribunal decision-making, two-stage search for flexibility in judicial review principles, vexatious applicant provisions, Vexatious Applicant Vexatious Application or Something Else? Dealing with Difficult Applicants under Freedom of Information Laws in Australia, vexatious application provisions, visa cancellation system |
This Part includes the following articles: “Migrating towards a Principled Approach to Reviewing Jurisdictional Facts” – The Hon Justice R Derrington; “Materiality: Marking the Metes and Bounds of Jurisdictional Error?” – Harry Aniulis; and “A Question of Capacity: Does the AAT Have the Power to Appoint Litigation Guardians?” – Matthew Paterson. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial: “Immigration Litigation – Impact, Study and Reform”; Current Issues: “Finding Law in a Time of Emergency: COVID-19” – Katie Miller; and Book Review: “Military Law in Australia, by Robin Creyke, Dale Stephens and Peter Sutherland (eds)” – Reviewed by Matthew Groves.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged A Question of Capacity: Does the AAT Have the Power to Appoint Litigation Guardians?, Administrative Appeals Tribunal, AJ Admin L, articles, book review, Current issues, Dale Stephens, Dr Janina Boughey, Editorial, Finding Law in a Time of Emergency: COVID-19, Greg Weeks, Harry Aniulis, Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, Immigration Litigation – Impact Study and Reform, Katie Miller, Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW), Klewer and National Disability Insurance Agency, Materiality: Marking the Metes and Bounds of Jurisdictional Error?, Matthew Groves, Matthew Paterson, mental and physical impairments, Migrating towards a Principled Approach to Reviewing Jurisdictional Facts, Military Law in Australia, Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Peter Sutherland, Robin Creyke, s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), The Hon Justice R Derrington |
This Part includes the following articles: “Judicial Review of the Fast-track Asylum Seeker Assessment Process” – Tim Peyton; and “A(nother) New Unreasonableness Framework for Canadian Administrative Law” – Janina Boughey. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial: “The Ongoing Quest to Define a Duty of Consistency”; Casenote: “CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50” – Stephen Tully; Speech: “Delivering Reasons in the Tribunal Context” – The Hon Justice A S Bell; and Book Review: “Administrative Redress in and out of the Courts, by Greg Weeks and Matthew Groves (eds)” – Reviewed by Dr Maria O’Sullivan.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged A(nother) New Unreasonableness Framework for Canadian Administrative Law, Administrative Redress in and out of the Courts, AJ Admin L, articles, asylum seekers, book review, Casenote, CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] HCA 50, Delivering Reasons in the Tribunal Context, Dr Janina Boughey, Dr Maria O'Sullivan, Editorial, expedited merits review, fast-track scheme, Greg Weeks, Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA), Janina Boughey, Judicial Review of the Fast-track Asylum Seeker Assessment Process, Matthew Groves, Nathalie Ng, Speech, standards of review, Stephen Tully, The Hon Justice A S Bell, The Ongoing Quest to Define a Duty of Consistency, Tim Peyton |
This Part includes the following articles: “The National Disability Insurance Scheme and Administrative Decision-Making: Unique Challenges and Opportunities” – Louise P Bygrave and Ron McCallum; “Australian Tribunals: Impact of Amalgamation” – Robin Creyke; “Administrative Justice and the Legacy of Executive Devolution: Establishing a Tribunals System for Wales” – Sarah Nason and Huw Pritchard; and “Administrative Justice and Tribunals in the United Kingdom: Developments; Procedures; and Reform” – Robert Thomas. Also in this Part is an Editorial: Tribunals – Their Continued Evolution and Reform.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged 2007 tribunal system reforms, Administrative Appeals Tribunal, Administrative Justice and the Legacy of Executive Devolution: Establishing a Tribunals System for Wales, Administrative Justice and Tribunals in the United Kingdom: Developments Procedures and Reform, AJ Admin L, articles, Australian Tribunals: Impact of Amalgamation, Editorial, financial support, Greg Weeks, Huw Pritchard, initial administrative and review decisionmaking, jurisdictional issues, Louise P Bygrave, Matthew Groves, modernisation or digitisation of tribunals, NDIS, persons with disabilities, relationship between government and tribunals, Robert Thomas, Robin Creyke, Ron McCallum, Sarah Nason, The National Disability Insurance Scheme and Administrative Decision-Making: Unique Challenges and Opportunities, Tribunals – Their Continued Evolution and Reform, Upper Tribunal, Welsh tribunals |
This Part includes the following articles: “A Typology of Materiality” – Paul Daly; “Failure to Adhere to Policy: A Category of Jurisdictional Error?” – Patrick McCabe; and “Creating a Framework for Evaluating the ‘Effectiveness’ of the Commonwealth Ombudsman” – Jeremy (Wei Peng) Soh. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Casenote: In Defence of Spent Convictions: Frugtniet v Australian Securities and Investments Commission and the Administrative Decision-Maker; and Book Reviews.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged adherence to policy in Australian administrative law, AJ Admin L, Book reviews, Casenote, Chris Field, Closer to the Machine: Technical, Commonwealth Ombudsman, Dr Janina Boughey, Editorial, Frugtniet v ASIC, Greg Weeks, Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 34, Jeremy (Wei Peng) Soh, Katie Miller, Marc Hertogh, materiality in judicial review, Matthew Groves, Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA [2019] HCA 3, Nathalie Ng, party politics and supervisory review, Patrick McCabe, Paul Daly, Research Handbook on the Ombudsman, Richard Kirkham, Richard Tracey QC, Social and Legal Aspects of AI, Stephen Cremean, use of policy in administrative decision-making |
We note with great sadness the death of Richard Tracey AM RFD QC, on the 11th of October 2019. Mr Tracey passed away after a brief battle with cancer. He was at the time of his death, Commissioner on the current federal royal commission into aged care. Mr Tracey has a long and distinguished career ...more
This Part includes the following articles: “Duties to Consider” – Geoffrey Kennett SC; “Remedial Invalidity in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America: A Legislative Solution to a Common Law Problem” – Anthony Hall; and “Finding Fairness in Fact Finding: Material Mistake of Fact Review in Asylum Cases” – Esther Pearson. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Casenote: Jurisdictional Error and Materiality: Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 359 ALR 1; [2018] HCA 34; and Current Issues.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged “relevant considerations” ground of review, AJ Admin L, Casenote, Current issues, duty to consider, Editorial, Esther Pearson, Evan Leslie Taylor, fact review in asylum cases, Geoffrey Kennett SC, Greg Weeks, Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 359 ALR 1; [2018] HCA 34, Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), Justin Davidson, Katie Miller, Larissa Welmans, Loretta Foran, Matthew Groves, Nathalie Ng, refugee status determination, remedial invalidity in Australia and the UK, Stephen Tully |
This Part includes the following articles: “Standards of Appellate Review in Public Law Australia” – Kristina Stern and Georgina Westgarth; “Deliberation and Automation – When is a Decision a ‘Decision’?” – Yee-Fui Ng and Maria O’Sullivan; and “Re-thinking Bias in the Age of Automation” – Sarah Lim. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Current Issues; and Book Review.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged A Theory of Legitimate Expectations for Public Administration, Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), AJ Admin L, Alexander Brown, automation for administrative law, bias of automated systems against administrative decisions, book review, Current issues, digitalisation and automation of government processes, Editorial, Full Federal Court of Pintarich v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 79, Georgina Westgarth, Greg Weeks, Janina Boughey, Justin Davidson, Katie Miller, Kristina Stern, Maria O’Sullivan, Matthew Groves, Minister for Immigration & Border Protection vs SZVFW (2018) 92 ALJR 713; [2018] HCA 30, right to know, Sarah Lim, standards of appellate review in public law, Stephen Tully, Yee-Fui Ng |
This Part includes the following articles: “Judicial Review is Dead – Long Live Judicial Review!” – Justice Rachel Pepper; “Cyber-insecurity: Data Breaches, Remedies and the Enforcement of the Right to Privacy” – Rose Dlougatch; and “What Probuild Says about Statutory Interpretation” – Steven Gardiner. Also in this Part are the following sections: Editorial; Current Issues; Casenote: Minister for Immigration & Border Protection v Egan [2018] FCAFC 169; and Book Reviews.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged AJ Admin L, Australian Constitutional Values, book review, Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), Casenote, Current issues, Editorial, Ellen Rock, Government Procurement (Judicial Review) Act 2018 (Cth), Greg Weeks, Janina Boughey, judicial review proceedings, Justice Rachel Pepper, Justin Davidson, Katie Miller, Matthew Groves, Minister for Immigration & Border Protection v Egan [2018] FCAFC 169, Nathalie Ng, Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 92 ALJR 248, remedies for data breach victims, Rosalind Dixon, Rose Dlougatch, Statutory interpretation, Stephen Tully, Steven Gardiner |
This Part includes the following articles: “Commonwealth Government Contracts, the ‘Common Assumption’ and Statutory Backing” – Nick Seddon; “The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Rules of Evidence” – Duncan Wallace; and “Declaratory Relief and Public Law Litigation in the 21st Century” – Leigh Howard. Also in this Part are the following sections: Current Issues; Casenotes: Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 92 ALJR 481; [2018] HCA 16 and BGH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 1009; and Book Reviews.
Posted in Australian Journal of Administrative Law (AJ Admin L), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "common assumption", AJ Admin L, BGH16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 1009, Book reviews, Bruce Chen, casenotes, Current issues, Dan Meagher, declaratory relief and public law litigation, Duncan Wallace, Editorial, Greg Weeks, James Stellios, Janina Boughey, Justin Davidson, Katie Miller, Leigh Howard, Lisa Burton Crawford, Matthew Groves, Nathalie Ng, Nick Seddon, penalty privilege and self-incrimination privilege, Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 92 ALJR 481; [2018] HCA 16, Stephen Tully, The Principle of Legality in Australia and New Zealand, The Rule of Law and the Australian Constitution, Tom Colwell, Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Williams v Commonwealth (2012) 248 CLR 156; [2012] HCA 23 (Williams 1) |
Facebook
Twitter
Rss
Journals Talk is Thomson Reuters’ portal for our journals customers and contributors. Here you’ll find the latest on the most extensive range of legal journals in the Australian market, along with articles, news, submission requirements and more.