*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.

To purchase an article, please email: [email protected] or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AEST).

The latest issue of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (Volume 26 Part 2) contains the following material:


  • Consumer Guarantees and the Doctrine of the Half-Truth


The Collapse of Dick Smith and the Problem of Gift Cards: Issues and Alternatives for Consumer Protection – Mohammed Al Bhadily and Kyle Bowyer

Gift cards are a multi-billion dollar industry in Australia. The convenience and flexibility they provide have made them highly successful. However, when a gift card seller becomes insolvent and is unable to or refuses to honour gift cards, consumers are left in an often hopeless position. The collapse of electronics giant Dick Smith in January 2016 highlighted the vulnerability of gift card holders when the receiver refused to honour gift cards worth around $2.5 million. This article explores the gift card industry in Australia and the collapse of Dick Smith. It briefly explores current protective measures for creditors in the event of insolvency and laments the lack of particular protection for gift card holders. The authors argue that gift card holders are in many ways different to other unsecured creditors and that perhaps additional protective measures are necessary. The authors analyse protective measures in other jurisdictions and provide some suggestions for protection in Australia.

The New Section 46 Misuse of Market Power Test and the European Intel Experience – Elizabeth Hersey

The Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) recent Intel Corp Inc v European Commission (Intel) decision has reinstated the need for a proper economic analysis of the “effects” of conduct alleged to be in breach of Europe’s “abuse of dominance” prohibition. The judgment, while arguably restoring reason to the European regime, prompts the question – is such an outcome available under Australia’s new s 46 “misuse of market power” test? The author explores below whether, notwithstanding the controversy surrounding the introduction of an “effects” limb to the s 46 test, it is actually the retention of the “purpose” limb without the counterbalance of the “taking advantage of limb” which should cause concern, inter alia by enabling the “per se” approach to misuse of market power that was rejected by the CJEU in Intel.

DEFECTIVE GOODSEditor: Thomas Horatio John Cadd

  • US Medical Devices Cause Significant Health Issues, Caravan Defects Are No Holiday, and Reasonable Offers Put a Spoke in a Wheel

CASE NOTEEditor: Christopher Hodgekiss SC

  • The Flyash Saga: Chapter Three Rebecca McEwen


  • The Australian Competition Tribunal in 2017 Tim Luxton


  • Robert Baxt AO Chair, Trade Practices Commission, 7 April 1988 to 30 June 1991 Hank Spier


  • Beyond the Effects Test Peter Strong


  • The Banking Royal Commission: Putting Business-First Capitalism on Trial Xavier O’Halloran


  • South Africa – Enhanced Focus on Market Inquiries Lesley Morphet


  • The Commerce Commission Clamps Down on Mobile Traders Debra Wilson



For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: AJCCL Vol 26 No 2 Contents.

Click here to access this Part on Westlaw AU

For general queries, please contact: [email protected].