*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU. If you are using Checkpoint, the links can be found in the Checkpoint PDF at the bottom of this post.

To purchase an article, please email: [email protected] or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AST).

The latest issue of the Australian Business Law Review (Volume 46 Part 4) contains the following material:



A Conceptual Assessment of Board Skills in ASX 100 Companies – Thea Voogt

The legal standard of the skills required of directors is usually framed in reference to the specific duties they have, leaving a void in the conceptualisation of the skills of non-executive directors (NEDs) who dominate the composition of ASX 100 company boards. The skills of ASX 100 boards are nevertheless a matter of public record through the disclosure of skills matrices. This article relies on case law to construct a model of the skills required of directors of large listed companies. The model is applied as a conceptual assessment tool against ASX 100 company board skills and finds that there is a significant divergence between company-specific board skills and the legal conceptualisation of director skills. The article also finds that there is little consensus about a common skills set amongst ASX 100 company boards.

Gender Disparity in Cartel Conduct – Andrew Christopher and Sarah Andrews

There is a significant gender disparity, both in Australia and internationally, amongst individuals involved in price fixing and other forms of cartel conduct. An analysis of relative numbers investigated and prosecuted by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and equivalent authorities around the world in the late 20th and early 21st century reveals that less than 5% have been women. The reasons for, and implications of, this stark gender disparity have not been examined in any significant way. While the “glass ceiling” no doubt excludes many women from the types of roles typically occupied by competition law offenders, this cannot be the only factor at play. The rates of female offending have not risen proportionately with rates of female employment in senior management positions. This raises an intriguing question of whether, even when given the opportunity, women are less likely than men to engage in breaches of competition law and, if so, why? This article seeks to explore some of the potential reasons underlying the ongoing low levels of female participation in cartel conduct.


  • Australian Federal Court Reforms Class Actions Settlement Practice – Michael Legg and John Emmerig

For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: Westlaw AU – ABLR Vol 46 No 4 Contents or here: Checkpoint – ABLR Vol 46 No 4 Contents.

Click here to access this Part on Westlaw AU

Click here to access this Part on Checkpoint

For general queries, please contact: [email protected].