*Please note that the links to the content in this Part will direct you to Westlaw AU.
To purchase an article, please email: LTA.Service@thomsonreuters.com or contact us on 1300 304 195 (Australian customers) or +61 2 8587 7980 (international customers) during business hours (Mon-Fri, 8am-6pm AEST).
The latest issue of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (Volume 25 Part 2) contains the following material:
- The More Things Change, the More …
This article provides a discussion on the meaning of the elements of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) as applied to the internet and some challenges faced when applying that law. The difficulty arising in most of these challenges lies not so much in understanding the law itself, but rather in the application of the law (as it exists in the offline environment) to the unique characteristics and distinctive features of the internet. Where appropriate, the discussion provides general propositions to assist in avoiding contraventions of the law. Given the substantial number of online commercial transactions and the fact that s 18 of the ACL is the most litigated legislative provision in Australian law, it is hoped that this article will provide greater public awareness of the challenges that exist.
Influencers, Instagurus, and Enablers: Using Accessorial Liability to Establish a Norm of Behaviour in Relation to Disguised Viral Marketing – Lynden Griggs and Aviva Freilich
The nature of advertising is changing rapidly. With an interconnected world, online advertising has now become more prevalent, more valuable, and possibly more insidious than traditional forms of advertising. In this article, the authors consider the practice of “disguised marketing”. This practice is often facilitated by people collectively known as “influencers” or “instagurus”, and while the failure to identify a commercial connection between these persons and the goods or service can lead to harmful consumer outcomes, it is suggested that to establish a better norm of conduct, the regulator may well consider targeting the “enabler” of such information. This enabler, depending on the context, may be the search engine or social media site that allows the display of information to occur. When this targeting is combined with regulatory direction and primary liability as appropriate, the infrastructure necessary to achieve better consumer outcomes will be in place.
Big data is an increasingly important part of business. As a result, it has started to attract the attention of competition regulators. So far, both commentators and regulators have focused on whether or not possession of big data can be a barrier to entry or a source of market power. However, in some circumstances just focusing on the possession of big datasets may not be enough. Big data is valuable because of the information that is contained in it. This information can only be extracted through processing and analysis. However, big data demands a new approach to processing and analysis which is costly. Given these characteristics of big data, the author argues that in certain circumstances the cost of processing and analysis necessary to transform data into information must be explicitly considered when analysing the competitive implications of possessing big data.
- Does Price Monitoring Have a Place? – John Hedge
- A Record Penalty: ACCC v Reckitt Benckiser (Aust) Pty Ltd – Matthew Barry
- The Australian Competition Tribunal in 2016 – Tim Luxton
- Informing Consent Online and Empowering Consumers through Better Communication of Privacy Information – Jeremy Riddle
- The Trigger for Australian Competition Liability – Russell Miller AM
- Is There a Business Civil War? – Peter Strong
- Russia’s Dominance Case against Google – Evgeny Khokhlov
- Thirty Years On: The Pearl Anniversary of New Zealand’s Fair Trading and Commerce Acts – Lindsay Trotman and Matthew Berkahn
For the PDF version of the table of contents, click here: AJCCL Vol 25 No 2 Contents.
For general queries, please contact: email@example.com.