Benchmarks

Home
Journals
News & Summaries
- Update Summaries
Journals Index
Subscribe & Purchase
Permissions
Submissions

Home

Benchmarks

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 26 Pt 2

By Journal Alerts on June 6, 2018

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “The Collapse of Dick Smith and the Problem of Gift Cards: Issues and Alternatives for Consumer Protection” – Mohammed Al Bhadily and Kyle Bowyer; and “The New Section 46 Misuse of Market Power Test and the European Intel Experience” – Elizabeth Hersey; and the following sections: Defective Goods; Case Note; Tribunal Tableaux; Obituary; Comments from Commerce; Consumer Concerns; Report from Africa; Report from New Zealand; Benchmarks; and Odds & Ends.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged ACCC v Cement Australia Pty Ltd, AJCCL, Australian Competition Tribunal in 2017, Banking Royal Commission, Benchmarks, Case Note, changes to s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Christopher Hodgekiss SC, collapse of Dick Smith, Comments from Commerce, Consumer concerns, Consumer Guarantees and the Doctrine of the Half-Truth, Consumer Protection, Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), Debra Wilson, Defective Goods, Editorial, Elizabeth Hersey, gift cards in Australia, Hank Spier, Intel Corp Inc v European Commission (Intel), Kyle Bowyer, Lesley Morphet, misuse of market power test, Mohammed Al Bhadily, Obituary, Odds & Ends, Peter Strong, Rebecca McEwen, Report from Africa, Report from New Zealand, Robert Baxt AO, s 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Thomas Horatio John Cadd, Tim Luxton, Tribunal Tableaux, US medical devices causing health issues, Xavier O’Halloran | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: Vol 25 Pt 2

By Journal Alerts on June 15, 2017

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Proving Misleading or Deceptive Conduct: Challenges Posed by the Internet” – Adrian Coorey; “Influencers, Instagurus, and Enablers: Using Accessorial Liability to Establish a Norm of Behaviour in Relation to Disguised Viral Marketing” – Lynden Griggs and Aviva Freilich; “Extracting Value from Big Data: Taking Big Data Processing and Analysis into Account” – Suiyi Zhang; Access to Services; Case Note: Tribunal Tableaux; Consumer Concerns; What If…; Comments from Commerce; Report from Russia; Report from New Zealand; and Benchmarks.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Journals, Update Summaries | Tagged "Because of the conduct", "Knowingly concerned", "Particular purpose … that the consumer makes known", "Request", "Undue", abusing dominant position, ACCC v Reckitt Benckiser (Aust) Pty Ltd [2016] ATPR 42-530; [2016] FCAFC 181, Access to Services, accessorial liability, Adrian Coorey, AJCCL, Australian Competition Tribunal, Aviva Freilich, Benchmarks, big data, business community, Case Note, civil penalties, Comments from Commerce, Commerce Act 1986 (NZ), Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Consumer concerns, disguised viral marketing, DP World Sydney Ltd v Guy (2016) 262 IR 156; [2016] NSWSC 1072, Editorial, enablers, Evgeny Khokhlov, Fair Trading Act 1986 (NZ), Google, influencers, information collection online, informed consent online, instagurus, internet, Jeremy Riddle, John Hedge, Lindsay Trotman, Lynden Griggs, Matthew Barry, Matthew Berkahn, merchantable quality, misleading or deceptive conduct, online advertising, online commercial transactions, Peter Strong, price monitoring, privacy information, processing and analysis, Report from New Zealand, Report from Russia, restraint of trade clauses, Ron Desiatnik, Russell Miller AM, Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service, s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law, Suiyi Zhang, Tim Luxton, Tribunal Tableaux, trigger for Australian competition liability, What if... | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: December 2015

By Journal Alerts on December 9, 2015

The latest Part of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes the following articles: “Serving the goals of trademark owners through the Australian Consumer Law: A reflection on Google Inc v ACCC” – Althaf Marsoof; and “Exempting environmental protection boycotts from competition laws: Should purpose or public benefit be the test?” – David Goodwin; and the following sections: Defective Goods, Case Notes; Report from India; Report from North America; Benchmarks; and Book Review.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged Abhilasha Nautiyal, ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 317 ALR 73, ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330, ACCC v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 110 IPR 324, accessorial liability provisions, AdWords, AJCCL, Australian Consumer Law (ACL), Benchmarks, book review, boycotts, case notes, Christopher Pleatsikas, Competition Commission of India, competition laws, Consumer Protection, David Goodwin, Defective Goods, Director, dominant purpose test, Dr Ron Desiatnik, e-commerce, Editorial, environmental protection, exemption, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v CFMEU (2015) 229 FCR 331, From Protection to Competition: The Politics of Trade Practices Reform in Australia, Google Inc v ACCC (2013) 249 CLR 435, intellectual property, Kerrie Round, Larissa Detmold, Martin Shanahan, misleading and deceptive, North Carolina Dental case, online service providers, public benefit test, Report from India, Report from North America, Rural Export & Trading (WA) Pty Ltd v Hahnheuser (2008) 169 FCR 583, s 45DD(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), start-ups, Swati Sharma, Thea Fabricius, therapeutic gel packs, Tom Bridges, Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), trademark owner | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: December 2013

By journals team on December 20, 2013

The last Part for 2013 of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes an article by Verity Quinn and Rosannah Healy about the current state of Pt IIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and the benefits of Australia having a national third party access regime. Also in this Part are the following section notes: Access to Services, Administration and National Competition Policy, Consumer Protection, Energy Etchings, Comments from Commerce, Benchmarks and Reports from Europe, North America and Russia.

Posted in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law (AJCCL), Update Summaries | Tagged Access to Services, Administration and National Competition Policy, AJCCL, Andrew Reeves, Benchmarks, Bernard McCabe, Christopher Pleatsikas, Comments from Commerce, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Consumer Protection, David Mierendorff, Energy etchings, Frank Zumbo, Jochen Beck, Julia Borisova, Laurent Ruessman, national third party access regime, Pt IIIA, Report from Europe, Report from North America, Report from Russia, Rosannah Healy, Simon Pryor, Thomas Kaldor, Verity Quinn | Leave a response

Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law update: June 2012

By journals team on June 6, 2012

The latest issue of the Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law includes an article by Nick Seddon and Saul Fridman that considers the inconsistency under the uniform Australian Consumer Law with regard to misleading conduct and contributory fault. There are also several section notes included in this Part: Book reviews, Council considerations, Commission cameos, Enforcements and remedies, Authorisations and notifications, Reports from India, Africa and North America, and much more!